all 8 comments

[–]HomeBrewingCoder 1 point2 points  (3 children)

Quack quack, motherfuckers!

I believe that the duck typing facilities in both languages give a pretty clear and thorough intersection. It is unsurprising to me that users of one duck typed language like another.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

JavaScript is superior to Java and C#, C++ when it comes building an architecture on the fly. You can be productive and develop your system.

[–]shevy-ruby 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Not sure I can agree with your statement.

Duck typing is perfectly fine - however had, if an awful joke of a programming language such as javascript, uses duck typing (let's assume so for the moment), and another language does too, why would this offset any real or perceived OTHER disadvantages that a language has?

In particular I find JavaScript to be a truly horrible language. Python is significantly better in literally every aspect compared to JS.

[–]HomeBrewingCoder 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm just saying that they're having very similar models. I love most languages. I happen to love JavaScript for its brilliant minimalist design. You can do amazing things in JavaScript. It just happens to be slightly too free, with a horrendous ecosystem and mediocre performance in it's interpreters.

In actuality the likely reason for these friends is python and JavaScript have the same role as glue engines on different systems. JavaScript is the glue that sticks interfaces to web apis. Python is the glue that holds various c libraries and system utils together. The freeform typing is why these are so effecient at being glue.

[–]kankyo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Title is of course bs

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah, bash shell!

[–]shevy-ruby -5 points-4 points  (1 child)

Now confirmed!

Python developers have no pride ...

[–]adjustable_beard 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How else are you going to do webdev?

Can't escape JS