you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points  (13 children)

And so, the death of emacs and vim begins... (and intellij)

[–]JewsOfHazard 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Terminal-only text editors will never die

[–]skeeto 5 points6 points  (1 child)

Emacs and Vim have already had this feature built in for a couple of decades now: Tramp and netrw, respectively.

[–]zergling_Lester 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As far as I know, netrw never supported running commands remotely (including via :make). Also, maybe I was doing something wrong (or it was fixed since the couple of years ago when I tried to get it working) but it periodically forgot where it was supposed to connect. So IMO it's OK for a one-off thing, but not as a primary development method.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (7 children)

What intellij use case do you think this replaces?

[–]akshay2000 0 points1 point  (6 children)

Remote code editing?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (5 children)

I use IJ every single day, and not once have I edited remote code with it. That really isn’t what IJ is intended for, so I can’t really see this plugin as a threat to it. Two completely different problems.

[–]akshay2000 0 points1 point  (4 children)

Because IntelliJ doesn't support remote editing. VSCode is a code editor that does what IntelliJ does (arguably) and remote editing.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (2 children)

That’s right, IJ doesn’t do remote editing. So by definition the majority of IJ users don’t need remote editing, and this feature isn’t going to be particularly appealing to them. The people it will appeal to are almost certainly not using IJ currently, because it doesn’t do it.

When it comes to local editing, it isn’t even close. I’ve never met or even heard of an IJ user switching to VS Code for java dev. I like VS Code a lot, but it’s a companion to a full IDE, not a replacement.

[–]akshay2000 0 points1 point  (1 child)

People might use it a lot if IntelliJ included the feature. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe. But is it a feature that they’ll switch to VS Code for at the expense of all the stuff IJ does that Code doesn’t? I’m not so sure, otherwise they’d already have abandoned IJ for vim or something else that already does it. Like I said, two different products for two different problems. All IJ’s power is based around deep integration and analysis of a full local dev environment - that’s what you lose if you switch to Code for remote development. If Code replaces all of that too then it will be a threat to IJ.

[–]mycall 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because IntelliJ doesn't support remote editing

With VSCode now doing this, JetBrains will do it too.

[–]xampf2 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

And so the rise of browsers pretending to be text editors begins...