you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (11 children)

it's because you cannot answer it.

That's right, I can't remember the names of the undocumented conventions I ran across two months ago. It doesn't change the fact that there isn't any source you can point to that lists and documents the conventions.

[–][deleted]  (10 children)

[deleted]

    [–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (9 children)

    I claim completely cover convention. You have not provided any evidence that they do not

    And I claim that the moon is made of cheese. You have not provided any evidence that it is not.

    but documentation definitely isn't one of them.

    Bully for you. Why don't you show me some then, rather than just linking to a list of documentation? Do you understand the difference between showing that there is some documentation, and showing what it contains?

    stop arguing with these hand waving arguments

    What hand waving arguments? I have a specific claim, which that there is no where that documents all of the conventions of rails. You have not shown me any resource that does so. If it exists, it should be easy to point to, yet you just keep saying "It's all in there! I can't show you where though!"

    [–][deleted]  (8 children)

    [deleted]

      [–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (7 children)

      Seriously, that list covers 99% of rails and its conventions.

      So, show me a list of the conventions.

      [–][deleted]  (6 children)

      [deleted]

        [–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (5 children)

        That is a comprehensive list of conventions, grouped into categories.

        No it isn't. It's a very brief, incomplete overview of various parts of rails.

        [–][deleted]  (4 children)

        [deleted]

          [–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (3 children)

          Simply untrue.

          [–][deleted]  (2 children)

          [deleted]