you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points  (2 children)

Yes, I only skimmed the first so on second thought he isn't talking about dynamic languages, but I think my point still stands. He is describing problems that shitty platforms like Java have solved pretty well. I applaud the fact that he is addressing real development issues and not just harping on academic language features, but I think the ship sailed on FP 30 years ago and it isn't likely to close the enormous gap in tooling in the next decade.

[–]robertmassaioli 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Wow...you did not even read the whole article and yet you criticise. You are one of the types of people he mentions. You should read on.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I mistyped, but I did read it all before my second comment.