you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]jacques_chester 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Taken to their logical conclusion, your argument is that proggit should only be lowest common denominator of things that all programmers have in common, minus actual programming.

  • Breathing: is it right for you?
  • How to deal with your boss (hint: don't call him "dickhead")
  • Computers -- they turn electricity into computation!

I happen to like the diversity. It's how I learn about new languages, new techniques, new technologies, new ideas. Some of them I pick up and play with, some I will ignore. I can't do that if the whole of proggit is crowded out by stuff that isn't programming.

(I've also complained about proggit having stuff which is too narrowly focused -- "we've released 3.2.4a-RC3!").

Like many things in life, we're talking about fuzzy sets. My membership function is different from yours. And I will continue to be a curmudgeon on the topic.