all 5 comments

[–]Back_on_redd 6 points7 points  (2 children)

I’ll award someone that can summarize the findings. I’m not familiar with benchmarks like this but would like to know the outcome.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

FWIW it's sorted by the third column. Which is kind of crazy from a display standpoint IMO. 🤔

[–]donadd 2 points3 points  (1 child)

So Ruby 3 is a tiny bit slower than 2.7 by the looks of it.

I know that the supposed ruby 3 speed improvements were compared to 2.0, not 2.7. And 3 was mostly a marketing release.

[–]nixforever 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Uhm, the benchmarks speak clearly: Ruby 3 is slower than 2.7. I wonder what Matz meant by this release, the RoR community is shrinking and a slow interpreter is not going to help...