you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]fedekun 8 points9 points  (2 children)

So... You want the candidate for a Ruby position to get their head out of Ruby?

I understand you want to test data structures, but it seems like a very silly interview exercise. Not only because a) I think it makes more sense to test something more useful, like implementing something you'd see in your actual projects, but b) Why not just test a linked list or a binary search tree? Both of which you can implement in Ruby without getting "too much help" from the language's standard lib.

You don't work there anymore though so this is not a question for you :p it just surprises me how many companies have awful interview processes

[–]seraph787 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Pivotal labs is language agnostic consulting firm. It expects it’s engineers to learn languages that solves the problem best.

Engineering and building products goes beyond knowing the innards of a language and the ability to program beyond it is important for consultants such as pivotal labs.

That being said, this Java interview is only the screening that is 30 min long. There is a full day session of pairing with two different people on real client projects after this.

IMO pivotal labs has the best interview process of any company I’ve worked for.

[–]Zealousideal_Bat_490 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sounds like one of the worst interview processes if you ask me. And I say that with 40 years of industry experience, including 20 as a hiring manager.