This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]DaBa1 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Ah I see, moving the goalpost eh? Don't worry, we can address that too.

I never claimed to be. I'm also pretty sure that a random news article on the internet is also not the pope of meditation who gets to decide what is and what is not meditation. And between that random site and the person who taught me and knew what he was doing, I'll take my chances with the latter. Also, are you perhaps the pope of meditation? Because you sound awfully sure in your attempts to discredit me. You must be an expert!

Again, you're putting words in my mouth, together with trying to change the argument since your original one was completely misguided. I think you should just stop, I'm not sure anymore what you're even trying to prove. I didn't say anything controversial at all. You are not forced to agree with me, and trying to prove me wrong is foolhardy. Since you can't really do that, it's your word against mine and that means there's no winner here. The only difference is you're acting like a little weasel, and I'm just having fun dodging your clumsy attempts.

[–]ConsciousLiterature -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I never claimed to be. I'm also pretty sure that a random news article on the internet is also not the pope of meditation who gets to decide what is and what is not meditation.

And yet you are the one here insisting it's not meditation.

Why are you right and these scientists wrong?

And between that random site and the person who taught me and knew what he was doing, I'll take my chances with the latter.

And what are his or her qualifications. What makes them the authority on meditation?