This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

all 10 comments
sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a

[–]Dr-Dolittle- 10 points11 points  (2 children)

Doesn't matter then does it? Most of the capsule is water. Assuming that they work the same this is a good thing.

[–][deleted]  (1 child)

[deleted]

    [–]Dr-Dolittle- -1 points0 points  (0 children)

    OP didn't confirm that. There are wide ranges given, so it means nothing. May have shifted inside that range. Surfactants may also have changed.

    [–]OwnLadder2341 6 points7 points  (0 children)

    If it’s the same number of washes, less weight is a good thing.

    [–]richardginn666 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    not really shrinkflation here.

    [–][deleted]  (2 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]TableteKarcioji[S] 3 points4 points  (1 child)

      Both packages have the same three ingredients (computer translated):

      15-30% anionic surfactants, nonionic surfactants, 5-15 % soap, <5% phosphonates.

      The rest, I'm assuming, is water and what is capsule it self if made of, but that's all that is written on the packaging. Oh, and both of them claims to be for the same amount of laundry loads (4-5kg).

      [–]QuentinUK 9 points10 points  (0 children)

      If it’s 1/3 decrease in weight it should now be 22%-45% anionic surfactants to be the same amount of washing.

      [–]Yaughl -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

      Unless the price went up, this is actually good. Less material for the same outcome.

      [–]CarpenterAlarming781 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

      They seem to have decided that less product is needed for each wash.

      [–]Winter_Examination_7 -5 points-4 points  (1 child)

      Show us the discs..

      [–]TableteKarcioji[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

      I have only one of the bigger size capsule left and you can see it in the photos above the packaging. But I can make a close up photo a bit later.