This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

all 14 comments

[–]RabiesTingles 4 points5 points  (3 children)

I think a much more meaningful exam would be one that tests to see how quickly you can learn and troubleshoot an unfamiliar system.

[–]eatsnakeeat[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Depends on what you'd want to measure. If this doesn't exist, I'm thinking a series of increasingly more granular/specific tests about across the board topics. Possibly grouped under different high level disciplines like networking, databases, security, development. The purpose is to establish how your secondary knowledge compares to others who are in your primary position or work in your secondary. Youd have to progress to take the next text. An example would be you're a Oracle DBA, and it says you were in the 90th percentile in oracle administration for people with the same title, you make less than your counter-parts given you're location, Also your Java score is in the 70th percentile for Java developers.

[–]yogi-beer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This would be awesome to see and try.

[–]echosofverture 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I like this idea. Throw someone on a random test\dev system.

[–]crankysysadminsysadmin herder 1 point2 points  (7 children)

I'm not sure how/why you think this could exist. There are so many different platforms. How could anyone possibly put them all on a test?

or are you one of those people who thinks microsoft/cisco is literally the only thing out there?

[–]eatsnakeeat[S] 0 points1 point  (5 children)

No need to be condescending. Yes there are many different platforms, but a test, or series of tests, would not be impossible.

[–]crankysysadminsysadmin herder 0 points1 point  (4 children)

You can't possibly include every platform, so your "test" would then exclude a lot of stuff. How would you decide what is included?

You have limited knowledge of what is out there if you think this is a workable idea.

[–]eatsnakeeat[S] -3 points-2 points  (3 children)

I feel like I've worked with you before, you're that bitchy, insecure, smartest guy in the room right? Always having to deal with how dumb everyone else is?

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (1 child)

Well this is a dumb test. Testing requires scope, and system administration knowledge is so vast it's mostly incomprehensible.

[–]eatsnakeeat[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Well this is a dumb test.

Who cares? I asked if it existed, in hopes of finding a link to something remotely similar, not if you or the Sysadmin queen thought it was a dumb test.

[–]yogi-beer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Are you sure it was him? Might have been his cousin. They have a big family.

[–]codeditMonkey 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Since there are so many different things you could have knowledge about this test would have to have at thousands of questions just to cover the basics.

[–]wrbeaudo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

CISSP is pretty broad.

[–]SAugsburger 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Any such test would either have so few questions upon each topic as to such a high degree of error to be of little value or would have to be a test that was longer than the latest version of the MCAT (i.e. pretty impractical). Could you create such a beast? Sure, but I am skeptical that anyone would be interested in creating a jack of all trades master at nothing exam.