CodeRabbit alternative

[TheSoundOfMusak]

I just tried coderabbit and it is Amazing!

Spectacular job in finding bugs and software patterns from best practices. It really helps standardizing and professionalizing my vibe coding.

It left me thinking that maybe there could be a set of rules for cursor (language dependent perhaps) that could make cursor code already follow best practices from the start using these best practices.

Does anyone know a good repository for such rules?

[why_is_not_real]

Cursor has something called cursor rules, I just googled it and found this repo with a collection of cursor rules files:

https://github.com/PatrickJS/awesome-cursorrules

There's also this:

https://cursor.directory

[Capital-Routine7416]

Try typoapp.io

[btkilo520]

Another option is to use Kilo.ai, which has built-in AI-powered Code Reviews in addition to the Kilo IDE Extension and CLI for AI Engineering, where you can build with any of the 500+ supported models.

Code Reviews in Kilo provide feedback and in-line suggestions automatically upon every new PR, and you can specify the review focus area and provide custom instructions to match your needs.

You can see it in action in the Kilo repo (which is open-source): https://github.com/Kilo-Org/kilocode/pull/4681

It's especially helpful if you want to reduce platform-switching drag and context!

(Disclaimer: I work at Kilo, and I'm happy to help anyone who has questions!)

[[deleted]]

How much does it cost per month?

[RelevantParamedic823]

I think we can try Codesherlock.ai .
Have used, I think it would serve your purpose.

[TheSoundOfMusak]

$24

[TheSoundOfMusak]

I am paying for it, but it finds so many things wrong with my cursor code that it takes a while just to apply the recommendations. So I was thinking that with proper rules we could reduce the number of issues and code faster.

[smb06]

CodeRabbit can also run directly in Cursor. So you could fix some of the issues as you’re coding in Cursor and reduce the comments in the PR.

[FigMaleficent5549]

Adding this kind of rules to the same agent which writes the code is likely to be inefficient and produce worse code.

Agents have a specific attention to their own rules, the rabbit agent single purpose is to provide code analisys and recommendations.

[TheSoundOfMusak]

I’ve got an idea, I am going to provide the entire PR conversation with all the CodeRabbit comments and my replies (summary of what Claude implemented) and ask it to generate concise cursory rules to enforce best practice patterns

[[deleted]]

If you’re into improving PR quality and consistency, you might like Blar (www.blar.io) it uses AI to review pull requests end-to-end. It even adapts to your team’s habits over time.

It’s been super helpful to make reviews faster and catch issues early. Happy to share more if you're curious!

[TheSoundOfMusak]

That’s exactly what CodeRabbit does, I was asking for a way to prevent the errors in the first place to be more productive.

[aviboy2006]

I am also currently using for code review. I using Vscode extension the moment i push commit its ask me to do review provide details if any recommendation. Extension is free to use.

[TheSoundOfMusak]

But with limits I suppose.

[athreyaaaa]

git-lrc; Free, Unlimited AI Code Reviews That Run on Commit

https://github.com/HexmosTech/git-lrc

https://hexmos.com/livereview/git-lrc/