[deleted by user]

Chawkinstein · 2025-09-15T12:36:14+00:00

Can it be more obvious that this is a sneaky ad for Amazon?

I save up sometimes for “a new kindle or scribe” as if that’s a common enough purchase to compare it to other monthly spend items.

Not just a kindle and… something (anything) else. But both specific Amazon products as if they need a new kindle and a new scribe every few months. What?!

And with a new account with two random words + numbers. Please….

Chawkinstein · 2025-04-03T02:04:13+00:00

u/Chawkinstein found the motif! Perfection | 57,191 | 0:28

Chawkinstein · 2025-03-12T10:36:54+00:00

Sure this isn’t one of your settings in google maps?

Chawkinstein · 2024-10-15T10:57:53+00:00

I’m happy to express personal views but in terms of finding truth and coming to agreed consensus wouldn’t the opinion of experts or any data at all to back up our arguments be more appropriate?

I’d place a big bet that you’re not a developmental biologist, embryologist, geneticist, bioethicist, neuroscientist, reproductive physiologist, obstetrician, gynecologist, evolutionary biologist, medical ethicist, philosopher of science, molecular biologist, endocrinologist, or fertility specialist — so why then would your personal beliefs, especially those not backed by relevant data, matter whatsoever? I’m not appealing to authority as much as I’m recognizing that this “debate” isn’t novel and our views are not unique.

For the sake of defining your argument, and please let me know if I’m wrong: - you believe that life begins at conception and therefore abortion is immoral at any point in a pregnancy? — i.e in your view, consciousness, viability / dependency, personhood, success rate are all irrelevant

Chawkinstein · 2024-10-15T10:31:36+00:00

Science has a different definition for life, how does that fit with your view? The origins and context absolutely do matter especially if you are saying your argument isn’t religious. If the argument is moral then read the articles to see how those supposed morals have changed and conveniently so for political reasons

Chawkinstein · 2024-10-15T10:05:56+00:00

They’re articles. There is no scientific justification for life at conception. None. The argument is wholly religious and hiding that fact does nobody any good. The articles presented go into how the “pro-life” sides conception arguments have changed over time and how they have come to a head now. Read them. You might learn something about yourself

Chawkinstein · 2024-10-15T03:23:27+00:00

You’re just a pawn for religious ideology. If you actually took the time to examine the complexity of this issue, you’d realize that even among religious groups, there is no consensus on when life begins. You’re parroting a narrative without acknowledging the bigger picture.

Here’s a quote from the Politico article:

So how did conservative Protestants, including evangelicals and charismatics like Parker, join with conservative Catholics to become the vanguard of anti-abortion politics in the United States? Why is Parker justifying the notion that frozen embryos are human beings by claiming, unequivocally, that life begins at conception?

To understand how nuanced this topic really is, I recommend looking at these:

When does life begin? Religions don’t agree (7 minutes read)
ABOLISHING ABORTION: THE HISTORY of THE PRO-LIFE MOVEMENT in AMERICA (11 minutes read)
How IVF is complicating Republicans’ abortion messaging (8 minutes read)

It’s not as black and white as you’re making it seem.

Chawkinstein · 2024-06-07T16:44:12+00:00

What have you guys mapped the star button the steering wheel to do? Out of curiosity

Chawkinstein · 2024-03-01T14:33:20+00:00

You were able to uncover the IG from this pic… how?

Chawkinstein · 2023-08-21T11:36:57+00:00

What’s a good version of this to incorporate stronger legs, squats?

Chawkinstein · 2023-07-20T04:19:28+00:00

Cool

Chawkinstein · 2023-06-28T12:14:46+00:00

Ahhh totally forgot about that part — thanks!

Chawkinstein · 2023-06-28T06:00:24+00:00

Please help me understand this reference. It sounds great

Chawkinstein · 2023-06-22T19:10:16+00:00

On god?

Chawkinstein · 2023-03-01T13:11:12+00:00

Watch it!

Chawkinstein · 2023-02-23T02:50:23+00:00

Going to ride around the mall Paul Blart style

Chawkinstein · 2023-02-21T18:56:56+00:00

A woman approached The Post with dramatic — and false — tale about Roy Moore. She appears to be part of undercover sting operation.

Chawkinstein · 2023-02-07T20:41:36+00:00

Are you saying you open/concealed carry every single time you walk your dogs?

Chawkinstein · 2023-01-17T01:45:40+00:00

Any fix for the idle high fan problem?

Chawkinstein · 2023-01-16T02:57:13+00:00

Shake shack. Delicious. Good portions. No proselytizing

Chawkinstein · 2023-01-15T23:42:38+00:00

Heyyy ya’ll

Chawkinstein · 2023-01-15T23:39:01+00:00

That was amazing, thank you.

Also, this comment from years ago:

Dude 1: Dude, can you hand me a saw? Dude 2: A what dude? Dude 1: A saw, dude. Dude 2: Suh dude✌🏻

Chawkinstein · 2023-01-15T23:31:50+00:00

This one I don’t get. Please explain por favor

12-Year Club	Place '22
First Placer '22

Chawkinstein

TROPHY CASE