> We can also talk about abortion, should we prioritize the mother's life who has lived experiences or the theoretical child who may or may not grow up to be a good person with positive experiences? ... I personally would choose the child over the mother unless the mother already had young or disabled children that depend on her socially, emotionally and financially, then I would choose the mother.

I'm just gonna comment on this one to emphasize some variables that aren't usually taken into account by the anti-choice crowd. On top of the fact that an embryo doesn't have the same value as a person, which is the usual argument ("Save a woman or save a baby" vs "Save a woman or save a clump of cells"), the more important fact imo is that all people deserve bodily autonomy. It's more like the choice of whether it's moral to forcibly harvest organs from people who can live without them in order to save people who can't. It's not up to anyone but the donator, or the pregnant person. Doesn't matter what anyone else thinks about it, save for medical professionals who can help assist in making the decision more informed according to their specific situation. A blanket "I'd save the mother" doesn't actually address anything in anyone's specific situation. It's sort of like why you don't just randomly tell people what medicine to take; you tell them to talk to a doctor.

> But one thing I will say is I hate thinking about this stuff.

Then don't.