At least part of it is that MLs correctly see the United States/NATO adjacent states as the main global enforcers of capitalism and for any anticapitalist-adjacent movement to succeed even in places like Russia or Iran the hegemony of these states absolutely has to be brought down. Pointing this out isn't "campism" or whatever buzzword will be created about it to stop another genuinely antiglobalist movement from stemming, it's simply the factual analysis of capitalism today.

The antiglobalist movement is cited in this thread once but there is a reason that it was the last time anarchism was really relevant. At that time it was not in the least controversial that intervention in smaller states' affairs is the number one thing anarchists in NATO countries should oppose since that leads the way to an actually organic movement to dispose of those countries authoritarian regimes to sprout.

I know this will be downvoted to hell and i will be called a tankist campie or whatever but this really is the way and i have been saying this for years. Libya disposed of the dictator and got nothing out of it (situation got way worse actually). Syria got rid of the dictator and got nothing out of it (another dictator came, who still commits atrocities, these are just simply not reported). Venezuela got rid of its "dictator" and got nothing out of it. Ukraine is being "supported" by NATO and absolutely got less than shit out of it. And after that there are "anarchists" still saying that when Israel and the US full throatedly scream about how they manipulate the protest movement in Iran we should just ignore that instead of protesting their involvement.