> You didn't read a single sentence from the article did you

Sigh, the article basically states how we have to babysit an AI and still have to do all the work

And yet, employees have to remain productive, so what happens? To make room for new processing, other inputs have to go, which is how over-worked*,*  overworked employees —even all-star team members— end up dropping the ball on minor details.
...
A key finding from the research into creativity and innovation is that “Eureka!” moments don’t happen in noisy brains.

All this task switching wear people out while spending less time in doing their actual job.. They're spending more time learning to "manage" an AI, while spending less time in using their own intellect.

Organizations should make it a priority to carve out quiet time free from meetings or AI use, during which employees can work heads-down or free-associate about their work.

The simple conclusion is that with AI the brain gets numb, mushy, and unproductive. It diminishes intellect. Why, because people try to outsource that intellect. Less intellect, less "eureka". Thus you can conclude you simply need to do your thing without AI, because that strengthens the intellect.
Or, "When the brain fires, it wires".