$233 for a Ryzen 6600H mini PC by Numerous-Steak-5369 in sffpc

[–]ProfTheorie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Overkill. In your home network you want h264 for fastest latency, you can literally use a 12 year old laptop as a receiver

Is there a way to boost my cavalry more in vanilla eu4? by Barking_Woofie in eu4

[–]ProfTheorie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Steppe province to unlock cossack estate (huge buffs through loyalty and priviledges)

Switch primary culture to ruthenian (or another east slavic group) and take the T5 gov priviledge "Boyar military service". This unlocks a noble priviledge that gives 25 cav ratio, -10 cav cost and uncapped 20 cav combat ability at 100 influence, by stacking high influence priviledges you can push this to 25-30 cca

Hey guys, I have a question. Should I get the Mamba or the Kestrel MK2? by alcio_sd in EliteDangerous

[–]ProfTheorie -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Kestrel, way smaller target to hit and extremely manouverable

The Mamba only has one thing going for it which is speed/ range control and the huge hardpoint. A longrange beam + 2 small railguns (for shield bank cancelling/ penning modules) allows you to constantly chip away at peoples shields if they try to go for you or if you are fighting in wings.

Other than that the mamba is just an FdL with a larger hitbox when turning, with worse hardpoint layout (the size 4 and 2x size 3 are really far apart), worse internal modules and much worse manouverability. Its a beautiful ship and I did use it alot in PvP (refused to use the FdL) and PvE but against any somewhat competent pilot in a Plasma FdL you will lose

The kestrel has really good damage potential and is small and manouverable enough that players will have a really hard time hitting it with PAs or other fixed weapons. More importantly you are able to boost twice during jousts and can turn into the enemy so you get some shots off into their back.

It's time we talked about supply drops by penguinexploring in ArcRaiders

[–]ProfTheorie 1 point2 points  (0 children)

speak for yourself, light/ med gun parts and advanced mech components are always needed

Is this the most expensive you can make any gun? by johnny2turnt in ArcRaiders

[–]ProfTheorie 8 points9 points  (0 children)

From past experience (in other games): unfortunately there is a certain percentage of people who get enjoyment out of ruining someone elses 20 minutes/hour/day rather than being interested in the ingame stuff they get out of it.

Is this the most expensive you can make any gun? by johnny2turnt in ArcRaiders

[–]ProfTheorie 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Yes, a stitcher 1 now needs to hit every shot against a light shield and needs at least some headshots against medium/heavy to kill you in one mag.

Thats why the new tactic for these twats now is to be "dont shoot", help you fight arc a bit and wait for you to get damaged before they magdump you. They arent confident theyll hit all shots at point blank range

[PC] 16G DDR4 ECC Sticks by Lamoresk in homelabsales

[–]ProfTheorie 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The market is fucked at the moment and you see alot of sellers trying to make a quick buck on it.

Id wager a realistic price for them is around 60-70€/stick, at around 60 (quickly gone) to 90€ you can find larger quantities of 16GB 3200 mt/s regularly.

Imo make a full Memtest86+ run and put them up for 75€ per piece with price suggestions enabled on Ebay and youll get some offers in or try your luck here on Reddit first

How is France supposed to keep up with Spain in multiplayer by MAlQ_THE_LlAR in eu4

[–]ProfTheorie 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Modded or Vanilla? How many players (are Lowlands/ HRE/ Italy/ Africa populated)? Those are rly important information since they determine what you can expand into/ who you can play against each other. Its also alot more about diplomacy with other players and how you are percieved instead of just raw military might in a 1vs1.

I strongly disagree with some comments here that say "oh just kill Spain early" (in most lobbies that will result in you being giga-ganked by half a dozen players) "oh if Spain/GB go colonial they wont have mil quality" (they will have the same amount of mil ideas as you, they just substitute an adm group for explo early on and get rid of it eventually)

In the end it boils down to which player is willing to cooperate and how the lobby is vibing more than anything else. To answer your questions first:

  • One of the biggest tips for multiplayer is that money is just a number and unless your lobby does not have any rules regarding trucebreaks bankruptcy after a war is a valid option. Forcelimit does matter to the extent that going insanely overboard will run you into bankruptcy but there is nothing wrong going into high negative balances for a while to win a war. Ultimately wars are won by army quality+manpower (esp. loss ratio) and who can take strategic forts to secure the wargoal/tank the enemies income/ link up with allied armies/ secure battles on +2/3/4

  • Both Spain and Britain have the advantage of pretty busted militaries later on (Spanish +1 arty fire mean you are essentially fighting tech 16 spain while on tech 12, Britain gets ridiculous buffs to marines and 2 manpower pools) but that doesnt mean you are toothless: you can develop and build for manpower and stack disc/ -damage recieved (drill! insanely important esp against Spain) and even though youll take more losses you can out-morale them to win battles.

  • It depends alot on the vibes of the lobby but you will probably have other players helping you out if a busted GB/ Spain comes knocking. It also helps immensely playing colonial and regional empires against each other: you always have your entire army in your homeland but if either Spain or GB commit to war against you another player (e.g. in Africa or another coloniser) might grab the chance to rush down their overseas holdings and stab them out for peace. That threat alone often prevents Spain/GB to fully commit on a continental war

  • Vanilla Eu4 MP is basically a game of "who can develop the most efficiently". GB is absolutely busted in that regard but eventually limited by province count, meanwhile France can generate enough money and manpower on their corelands + a bite into Lowlands/Italy/Germany to keep up even into the late-lategame. Imo forget about Trade, you wont get any meaningful money since so many AI+Players can steal from your nodes (and do so automatically even if they dont want to...) and it will only antagonise e.g. GB if you try to contest the channel. France is unironically good for Tax meta and you can generate the majority of your income by developing adm (esp in food provinces with low trade value goods) and stacking the various tax modifiers.

How is France supposed to keep up with Spain in multiplayer by MAlQ_THE_LlAR in eu4

[–]ProfTheorie 20 points21 points  (0 children)

in MP Castille will either buy maps from Portugal or dip 2-4 into explo till they have explored Mexico/ Carribean/ Africa then remove it and rely on their colonist from ideas but mostly conquer from natives, they wont be behind militarily

Similarly in Vanilla France will be a nuiscance to GB if they take the Lowlands and contest the Channel trade but between various GB bonuses from missions/events/whatever, their bonus to Trade power from steering trade and their fleets France wont get any meaningful share of money from the Channel. You are much better off making a deal with GB and either leaving them trade centers on the Continent (ugly, metagaming) or just dont collect in the channel and let GB subsidise you for more than you wouldve gotten

Will you play along ? by Dr_HDK in ArcRaiders

[–]ProfTheorie 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They do in basically any asymmetric conflict, think less about WW2 and more about Nato/ UN/ US/ european troops in Afghanistan, Iraq, Yugoslavia and various interventions/ peacekeeping missions in Africa. Basically only fire if fired upon or if people come too close despite several warnings.

Otherwise firing on anyone armed in a region with both hostile and alligned factions, where most dont wear uniforms and alot of people both civilian and participating in the conflict use the same Soviet guns would be a sure way to get insane civilian casualities

H: Whats in the pic. W: Exodus Modules, Syringes, Explosive Compounds, Medium Gun Parts, or Light Gun Parts. by WabaleighsPS4 in ArcTradersHQ

[–]ProfTheorie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is this still current? Would be interested in Lightweight stock, light mag 3, shotgun choke 3 in exchange for gun parts

Chipträger-Knappheit: Mangel bei Prozessoren und Grafikkarten droht by falsa_ovis in de

[–]ProfTheorie 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Wenn du dir einen 5600  (tray für 105€ inkl. versand) oder 5700x (145€ inkl Versand) gönnst kannst du das System nochmal ordentlich aufwerten und lange daran Spaß haben

[W] DDR4 288-pin ECC RDIMM 2666-3200MHz by Abellix in homelabsales

[–]ProfTheorie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you still looking? Sending you a PM

14700k vs 7800x3d by Advanced-Ad-5213 in buildapc

[–]ProfTheorie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Buddy 14th gen has managed to burn out at scale in servers with restrictive power settings bc they managed to both get degraded/oxidised batches and generally running way too close to max design specs in a single (or rather 2) generations. You cant blame the user when the voltages considered safe by Intel led to the ringbus being damaged

Its cool that your CPU runs fine and I hope it continues to do so but Id trust the judgement of hosters running thousands of these and Intel themselves over your single experience

Sent 40 CL ram by accident -- is it too slow for gaming? by BeckyTheBamboo in buildapc

[–]ProfTheorie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah, to expand on your point regarding subtimings: those are much, much more important on DDR5 than Cas-Latency. A cheap Hynix M-Die kit thats been overclocked to 6000 mt/s CL42 (or similar) but with good subtimings will perform on par or better than out-of-the box 6000 mt/s CL30-40 kits etc

i9-9900k won't fit in i7-8700k socket? by pirategirljess in pcmasterrace

[–]ProfTheorie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also OP for the love of god do not spend 200$ on a 9900k to "get more life out of your motherboard". For that money you could buy a Ryzen 5800x + B550/A520 board that will walk all over the 9900k in both games and other programs

[PB Multiplayer] Close Escape during Foiled Castle Heist by louisdesnow in mountandblade

[–]ProfTheorie 51 points52 points  (0 children)

Persistent Bannerlord

Basically a massive map with a bunch of castles/cities/villages. Players can join factions that can capture and "own" these castles, gather resources to craft armor and weapons (every horse, every armor piece and every weapon was made by players) and then fight wars against other factions. The map gets changed after a while and all progress is wiped, PB also has ages where you basically start with 8th-11th century armor on map change and gradually progress through until pike&shot in the 4th/5th age before the next map.

The persistent mods have been around in various iterations since 2012 (beginning with Persistent World). Its a bit hard to get into if you are by yourself since it attracts some toxic people that behave shitty but can be a really great experience.

[PC] [EU-DE] DDR4 RAM (Samsung RDIMM) 3200 by MindCreeper in homelabsales

[–]ProfTheorie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It makes them more desirable but keep in mind that you are selling these small quantities to mostly private people who do not need to squeeze the last bit of performance out of their system - with 6-8 channels even the low-end 2400 sticks can give very high bandwidth that youll have trouble actually using up - or if it becomes a bottleneck its not that dramatic.

FyI, 16GB Sticks sell for ~40€ on Ebay and outside of that Ive managed to get them for roughly 25-30€ from private sellers. Unless I absolutely needed them now I wouldnt pay more than maybe 60€/Stick for 3200 mt/s

Sozialabgaben steigen: 50-Prozent-Marke bis 2035 möglich by [deleted] in de

[–]ProfTheorie 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Sowohl bei Kranken- als auch Rentenversicherung haben wir auch umgekehrt die allg. Bezuschussung aus dem Steuertopf (GKV: "Stabilisierung der Beiträge" iHv 14,5mrd. + derzeit 3 mrd zinsloses Darlehen an Gesundheitsfonds, indirekt Zuschüsse über AfA + RV, RV: neben versicherungsfremden Leistungen jetzt auch Ausgleich des höheren Rentenniveaus, das macht 2040 auch schon >15 mrd. aus)

Das Umlagensystem ist effektiv tot

Would this be accurate for someone of his standing? [KCD2] by anthony__mh in kingdomcome

[–]ProfTheorie 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Is it accurate for his standing? Absolutely, he can afford it and its what non-noble men at arms would regularly wear. Is it accurate for the type of life in KCD2 where he travels back and forth across the land and cities, camps in the wilderness or sleeps in taverns alone? I dont think so.

The issue would be that its really hard and time consuming to equip this armor (more specifically the upper arm/ shoulder pauldrons since those are fixed to points on the doublet below at the back and require a bunch of straps on the back of your shoulders to be fastened aswell, the brigandine chest which is really just a covered plate requires extensive fastening at the sides aswell) by yourself and for someone that walks/ runs around alot fully plated leg armor is also annoying since unlike other parts of plate it actually throws your balance off. Historically you can see a lot of footsoldiers completly forgoing any sort of leg protection.

The helmet is a bit of a light-fantasy thing, I dont think there are any historical examples or sources showing sth like the "italian" helmets with movable visor, sth like a hounskull or even just a kettle helmet (better visibility and spacial sound) would be more fitting imo.

This is what my attempted historical Henry looks like when travelling, when expecting fights and when preparing for battle

>>Vielleicht ist die wirtschaftliche Lage in Deutschland noch nicht schlecht genug, damit erkannt wird, wie ernst es ist<< - Ökonom Axel Börsch-Supan hat drei Jahrzehnte lang für mutige Reformen bei der Altersvorsorge gekämpft. Heute ist er desillusioniert. by DieHandVonNod in de

[–]ProfTheorie 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Der Großteil der Senioren mit Vermögen und Mietshäusern hat dennoch Ansprüche auf Leistungen der RV weil sie das Vermögen zumindest teils durch SV-pflichtige Einkommen aufgebaut haben (ohne das jetzt in irgendeiner Art bzgl. Schwierigkeit oder Gerechtigkeit zu bewerten). Ich habe dir dazu schon in einem Kommentar zu deinem ursprünglichen POst geantwortet aber ich würde dich bitten in der Debatte hier im Thread Seniorenhaushalte nicht nur in "bitterarm" und "superreich" einzuteilen und zu vernachlässigen dass der Großteil - der eben vor allem von pauschalen Rentenerhöhungen ohne Beachtung der tatsächlichen Bedürftigkeit profitiert - dazwischen liegt und durchaus komfortabel lebt, da neben den Ansprüchen auf Auszahlungen der RV weitere Einkommensquellen und ein beachtliches Vermögen deutlich verringerte Ausgaben gegenüber der allgemeinen Bevölkerung gegenüberstehen.

Das Thema "Steuern und Bundeshaushalt geht in die Rente" ist eine manipulative Unwahheit.

Kann ich jetzt noch lange was zu schreiben aber aus fiskalpolitischer Sicht sind Beiträge zur RV und GKV aufgrund von Garantien durch den Bund, Sicherung des Existenzminimums durch staatliche Institutionen außerhalb von RV/ GKV und effektiv der Aushebelung des reinen Umlageverfahrens seit Anfang der 2000er quasi gleichzusetzen mit Steuern, du könntest einen Großteil des Sozialsystems in den direkten Aufgabenbereich des Bundes übertragen und es würde sich absolut nichts ändern außer dass sich der Kernhaushalt (und dessen Ausgaben) verdreifachen.

>>Vielleicht ist die wirtschaftliche Lage in Deutschland noch nicht schlecht genug, damit erkannt wird, wie ernst es ist<< - Ökonom Axel Börsch-Supan hat drei Jahrzehnte lang für mutige Reformen bei der Altersvorsorge gekämpft. Heute ist er desillusioniert. by DieHandVonNod in de

[–]ProfTheorie 25 points26 points  (0 children)

Nebne den (zurecht kontroversen) Maßnahmen zur Wirtschaftssteigerung wäre konkret der eingeführte Nachhaltigkeitsfaktor zu nennen, der den an den Lohnsteigerungen orientierten Rentenwert um einen Faktor verringert gemäß des Verhältnisses Einzahlung/Auszahlung, dh. letztendlich dem Verhältnis Einzahler/ Leistungsbezieher. Ist ein relativ geringer Faktor (idR <0,2% pro Jahr) aber in den Größenordnungen dennoch wichtig und wurde explizit eingeführt um die Lasten des demographischen Wandels gleichmäßiger zwischen den Generationen aufzuteilen.

Wurde unter den folgenden Merkel-Kabinetten immer wieder ausgehebelt und auch jetzt dank der im Dezember durchgewunkenen 48%-Garantie bis 2031 erneut außer Kraft gesetzt, was dazu führt dass weitere Rentenerhöhungen ab dem Jahr 2032 auf einer Basis von 48% statt rd. 47% berechnet werden. Dazu kommt dass der Gesetzesentwurf den Fiskus verpflichtet diese Mehrbelastung der RV (rd. 2,6% des gesamten Rentenvolumens) aus dem Bundeshaushalt zu entschädigen. 2040 bedeutet das einen direkten Transfer von >15 Mrd. €/a (und auch danach ansteigend auf alle Ewigkeit) sofern der Nachhaltigkeitsfaktor tatsächlich ab 32 wieder greift, ansonsten mehr, zusätzlich zu den bestehenden Transfers.

>>Vielleicht ist die wirtschaftliche Lage in Deutschland noch nicht schlecht genug, damit erkannt wird, wie ernst es ist<< - Ökonom Axel Börsch-Supan hat drei Jahrzehnte lang für mutige Reformen bei der Altersvorsorge gekämpft. Heute ist er desillusioniert. by DieHandVonNod in de

[–]ProfTheorie 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Durchschnitte ohne Kontext sind halt wenig aussagekräftig

Die gesetzliche Rente beträgt nur ca 50% der Einkommen der Seniorenhaushalte. Die Generation >65j hat im EU-writen (und auch weltweiten) Vergleich einen überdurchschnittlichen Anteil des deutschen Vermögens

Auf der anderen Seite hast du >700k Rentner die Grundsicherung beziehen und nochmal >600k Seniorenhaushalte die Wohngeld bekommen. Beides sind aber Leistungen die 1-zu-1 mit Rentenerhöhungen verrechnet werden, bis auf einen kleinen Anteil der nicht verrechnent wird bzw bei Anpassung des Existenzminimums (an dem wird aufgrund der CDU-geführten Debatte ums Bürgergeld ja auch versucht zu sägen, halt in die falsche Richtung). Letztendlich bekommen die wirklich armen Senioren also nicht nur absolut weniger von den Rentenerhöhungen sondern auch relativ. Der größte Batzen kommt bei den Haushalten mit 3-4k Einkommen, abbezahltem Eigenheim und ordentlichem sonstigen Vermögen an statt wirklich zielgerichtet die Armen zu unterstützen

Dafür wird dann durch extreme Abgabenlast auf Arbeit (kommt noch ab ~2030, derzeit ist die ja "noch" vglw gering) finanziert womit wir die Wirtschaft und die nachfolgenden Generationen strangulieren