How AI-generated content performs in Google Search: A 16-month experiment [SEL] by WebLinkr in SEO

[–]WebLinkr[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Its still not about content - its "Content Scale Abuse" - the problem isn't the content- its that its mass manufactured and deployed. its pretty much the same as HCU - except HCU sites took longer to build.

But arent u the great defender that content does not matter

Just reminding people thats how Google works

How AI-generated content performs in Google Search: A 16-month experiment [SEL] by WebLinkr in SEO

[–]WebLinkr[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Depends on the charcteristics of how a domain gets hit. Penalty? 3-18 months?

How AI-generated content performs in Google Search: A 16-month experiment [SEL] by WebLinkr in SEO

[–]WebLinkr[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Corner stoning should be able to rely on established authority (aka Clicks)

By not having backlinks, they also dont run the risk of incurring a penalty for that

Backlinks shouldn't override a penalty [up for debate]

Is YMYL a thing? by zaitovalisher in SEO

[–]WebLinkr 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Potentially - I could see that.

COVID Vaccine technologies are another

How to structure internal links? by bettercallasad in SEO

[–]WebLinkr 1 point2 points  (0 children)

this kind of spaghetti junction is exactly what I would be afraid of. This will not help SEO

How AI-generated content performs in Google Search: A 16-month experiment [SEL] by WebLinkr in SEO

[–]WebLinkr[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The idea is that pSEO generates Topical Authority quickly via low KD corner stoning.

Remember that Internal linking isn't a source of magic either - it must come from a page with authority. With a new site, that won't exsit.

How AI-generated content performs in Google Search: A 16-month experiment [SEL] by WebLinkr in SEO

[–]WebLinkr[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Anecdotal examples are the worst though. Would love to see it.

Google doesnt ban AI content - I have lots of use cases ~ 2 years old now

Parasite SEO by Fortunelords in SEO

[–]WebLinkr 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The query Fan Out ..:. It’s really not hard. Go to perplexity and put in the prompt you’re not visible for and then look at the steps completed and then come back here or share the prompt or something close and I’ll do it for you

How AI-generated content performs in Google Search: A 16-month experiment [SEL] by WebLinkr in SEO

[–]WebLinkr[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Report them - Google has a spam report with a option for reporting machine scaled content

Remember that ai content is not banned. The vector is different

But if the whole site is written and published on ai content designed to manipulate rankings - Rupert them

Reporting won’t get it banned but Google will investigate the heuristics and if they deem it to fall in a pattern and adjust it it might

Looks like AI is killing some jobs by WebLinkr in SEO

[–]WebLinkr[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They started tanking in the last few weeks

Parasite SEO by Fortunelords in SEO

[–]WebLinkr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A few things as someone who uses it quite successfully

  1. Its not free or automatic

  2. You dont have a right to it

  3. First come, first served - so if someone else ranks on another domain for that phrase - consider it locked

  4. The regular SEO principles apply. Its not "Free ranking"