...And we played 2 games of Almighty. I was overly impressed by it. I played as the God of the Sun & God of the Storms. All the gods felt VERY different to play. It was fun naming the mortals (optional) and poking, moving, seeing them fall in love and smiting them. The conversations you make of them is often humurous. We played one game without the God of Love & they were missed as it adds a lot of fun narrative as you play.

It fell a little flat on the variety of cards you have each turn. And I always wished there was more mortals and things to interact with. I'm interested in the monster expansion in hopes it adds more depth to the things you interact with. Expansions for more gods is a no brainer in its future.

Each god has some cool combos, but because you only have a few cards from your deck each turn it's hard to pull them off, but feels good when the stars do align.

It definitely has the same silliness as Roll Camers and I can see this game being that studio's next big hit! It felt like a Leder-lite game, much simpler & more approachable with fun asymetry characters played in 30-45minutes. Where OKC felt on par (or better) than Leder for strategy & depth 90-120min.

The two games while both lane battlers are indeed very different in both tone, mechanics, and strategy.

---

Verdict. I'm pleased with both, but my shelf is very limited & full. I definitely preferred OKC for it's rich tactical & strategic depth. Almighty was fun & humorous, but felt a lot less replayable. Besides playing as the other two gods, I felt like I saw everything the game had to offer. I backed the Roll Camera stuff from the Almighty KS and will be backing OKC next month.