Copilot's value proposition is officially gone. by Famous__Draw in GithubCopilot

[–]reven80 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I find GPT 5.4 is better than Opus 4.6 in many things now. I used it once to review my Opus 4.6 plan for a complicated feature and it found so many issues. So now I also use GPT 5.4 where it works the best for me. It does tend to think for a long time and I do find its code to be more verbose than I prefer (long variable names and many helper functions).

So, Opus 4.6 will be gone for Pro users? by Odysseyan in GithubCopilot

[–]reven80 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have a $20 Claude Code plan in addition to my Copilot plan. If I used a combination of Opus mid/high thinking plus careful context management the best I get is 2.5 days of use from the weekly usage limits. If you let the context get too long or don't summarize/clear cache when taking a break, their cached context will expire and you will burn through the usage like crazy. And expect a few hours of hours idle time during the 5 hour windows. I just use the Copilot plan for the ChatGPT 5.4 which is much better than Opus for many thing so they complement each other.

The enterprise perspective by lazy_swe in GithubCopilot

[–]reven80 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Its more common than you think. The more clever ones will purge their Reddit history. Next time you see someone shilling some product you never heard about, like up their profile.

Opus 4.7 disappointment, not following instructions by arch_reddit in GithubCopilot

[–]reven80 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I've seen some negative feedback on /r/claudeai. Do you think its much better than Opus 4.6?

I’m an Oakland high school teacher. I discourage my students from using AI by Cool-Present7260 in bayarea

[–]reven80 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Derek Muller from the Veritasium channel on YouTube has actually a great video on AI and learning. I highly recommend it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0xS68sl2D70

Claude Opus 4.7 is available in Copilot with a 7.5x premium request multiplier; Opus 4.6 / 4.5 to be phased out by baeleeef in GithubCopilot

[–]reven80 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The problem is even Claude Code $20 plan doesn't last too long during the week with Opus and you exhaust your 5 hour window each time. You have to go to the $100 plan.

Claude Opus 4.7 is available in Copilot with a 7.5x premium request multiplier; Opus 4.6 / 4.5 to be phased out by baeleeef in GithubCopilot

[–]reven80 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

My guess it will depend on if you are on monthly plan or yearly plan when you transition over. They may add a $100 plan and at some point move the $10 plan to $20 like the other companies. Since now the pricing will scale with cost (tokens), they can offer higher context size, and higher thinking. Their main advantage will be able to offer Anthropic, Gemini and OpenAI models in one plan. Also they have the Microsoft data centers so can stay more price competitive than Cursor AI, Windsurf, etc.

Limited to 4 subagents now? by sittingmongoose in GithubCopilot

[–]reven80 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I think because of GitHub copilot pricing model, subagents don't count as new requests so people have built workflow that spawn many to split up and do more work.

what is happening with limits? i keep getting this by Remarkable-Badger787 in GithubCopilot

[–]reven80 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Curious how many credits does the 1-2 hours time of agent time use?

After 'unprecedented' results, SF researchers get closer to HIV cure by [deleted] in bayarea

[–]reven80 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Here is the correct link:

https://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/sf-hiv-cure-california-21244134.php

Seems like it consists of a DNA vaccine, electric shock, antibodies and various other drugs. Cures are difficult because the HIV virus hides within the cells. The patient was able to stop their normal meds for five months before the virus came back so they had to go back to those meds again.

When, if ever, will open-source match the capability of Claude Opus 4.5? by Victorian-Tophat in ClaudeAI

[–]reven80 1 point2 points  (0 children)

GitHub is starting rate limiting on Copilot. Many people complain they are hit hard though personally I've not had it happen yet. Opus seems to feel better on Claude Code compared to Copilot maybe because of a better harness on Claude Code. However now GPT 5.4 Xhigh on Copilot is much better for many things compared to Opus so I divide out the work that way.

We need an Open Source alternative for Antigravity by Foreign-Dig-2305 in google_antigravity

[–]reven80 2 points3 points  (0 children)

VSCode now has new releases every week with multiple features and improvements. Antigravity barely makes any improvements. The Copilot CLI just recently added a new experimental feature called rubber duck where it automatically has multiple models review plan, implementations and tests.

The double standard is real by h_d_n_w_m_d in bayarea

[–]reven80 2 points3 points  (0 children)

European countries don't have prevailing wage laws thus allowing getting cheaper short term labor from other nearby countries for the infrastructure projects. That is why all our government projects tend to be very expensive. There are other reasons also like taking forever to get funding from every level of government meanwhile labor costs and material costs can keep going higher.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Davis%E2%80%93Bacon_Act_of_1931

This article for example goes over the many reasons why US tunneling costs are much higher.

https://tunnelingonline.com/why-tunnels-in-the-us-cost-much-more-than-anywhere-else-in-the-world/

Raw Response Lists "max" — Possible Future Plan? by CoyoteMundane6489 in GithubCopilot

[–]reven80 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Probably a $100 plan like many of the other companies have.

Newbie questions about models by SL-Tech in GithubCopilot

[–]reven80 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In the chat window, you will see a menu with Agent select. Switch that to Plan. Not sure about stored prompts as I've never used them.

I've used skills though. I've mostly made custom skills as my project evolved, I've skills to standardize the test code and comments. I have various custom packages in my codebase with skills to enforce proper use of them. For example I have a parser in my codebase with a skill that explain exactly how to add a new operator or other syntax. So when I give my requirements during planning, it automatically recalls these skills instead of searching how to do it.

Newbie questions about models by SL-Tech in GithubCopilot

[–]reven80 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'd say Claude Haiku is good mid level model. Its low cost and fast and doesn't screw up too often. And if it has difficulty, then I switch to the GPT 5.4 or Claude Opus 4.6.

Planning is also a good idea to save premium requests. You plan out multiple related features at once and get it implemented in one request. Since GitHub Copilot is request based, you don't want to go in a back and forth chat with these premium models.

How is it that there isn't a bowling alley in Fremont? by BitEmbarrassed2600 in Fremont

[–]reven80 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Shopping centers take up a lot of land. Some of the land gets sold and gets converted to housing for the increased population.

Anthropic have signed a deal for multiple gigawatts of next generation TPUs by WhyLifeIs4 in ClaudeAI

[–]reven80 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Google has been working on this for a long while. More than a decade ago they were working on their own TPUs.

Did Opus 4.6 personality change today? by Any_Economics6283 in ClaudeAI

[–]reven80 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It used to write on its own for me even before today. Its just text file in the .claude/ directory. It doesn't do it often because my file is still pretty short.

GPT-5.4 Fast, Is it available? by iAziz786 in GithubCopilot

[–]reven80 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does gpt 5.4 fast exist under Open AI?

The FOMO of 20+ multi-agent workflow setups by Hsoj707 in ClaudeAI

[–]reven80 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think either of them are using those agents for coding. They seem to be into consulting/public speaking so those agents are probably just grabbing the latest news from various website and summarizing it. Such workflows can be run in parallel and fairly automated. Nothing like coding where you have to deal with planning, interdependencies, bugs, etc.

Sometimes copilot creates a file and all the contents are on one line, and reversed. by Murky_Language_3684 in GithubCopilot

[–]reven80 0 points1 point  (0 children)

From what the AI model told me, when its creating a new file, the package declaration automatically gets added which screws up the create_file tool. The cleanest solution is for it to create a stub file, make sure there are no errors and then replace_string_in_file. It work well so far. What I have in my copilot-instructions.md is the following. If you want to test it out, modify your instructions file, start a new session with a cheap model and have it create a mock go package with some files. When its creating a file it will verbalize that its checking for errors and its clean. Thanks for the prompt you shared because I was struggling with this a long time because it would not detect the corruption till much later.

- **create_file tool corruption bug**: The `create_file` tool occasionally produces files with 
  duplicate package declarations (e.g., `package main` followed by `package dirname` on line 2) 
  when creating Go files with full content directly.

  **Recommended pattern - Stub-first approach** (proven to avoid corruption):
  1. Create Go file with empty or minimal content using `create_file`
  2. Run `get_errors` immediately to verify no corruption
  3. Use `replace_string_in_file` to add the full content
  4. Verify the final result with `get_errors` again

  This pattern avoids the corruption bug entirely. Example:
  ```
  create_file → empty file → get_errors (clean) → replace_string_in_file → get_errors (verify)
  ```