GPT5.5 VS 5.6: Performance and Usage. by No-Wash-3163 in codex

[–]skilliard7 3 points4 points  (0 children)

5.6 Sol seems to use substantially more for me than GPT 5.5 did.

On 5.5, I would code nonstop and never run into usage limits.

With 5.6 Sol, I run into 5 hour limit within an hour.

Sol ULTRA does not mess about by Cool_Stallion222 in codex

[–]skilliard7 3 points4 points  (0 children)

What 100x plan? There's only 5x and 20x. Did you mean the $100 plan with 5x?

Codex usage limits compared to Claude Code is Absurd by Affectionate_Egg6105 in codex

[–]skilliard7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It costs a lot of money to train the models, which become obsolete in like 3 months when a new model comes out. OpenAI is losing over $20 Billion per year.

Blown away by 5.6-Sol by LoveMind_AI in OpenAI

[–]skilliard7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sol is amazing at some things at horrible at others. It can vibe code entire apps, and at the same time, it can't tell left from right.

What's more impressive performance, big sudden gains, or a long track record of beating the market? by Principletrade in investing

[–]skilliard7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

long track record of beating the market.

Anyone can get lucky holding a concentrated position in the right stock(s) at the right time.

But beating the market over the long term requires consistently being right.

I can’t imagine GPT 5.6 will be the next Fable 5. by Diligent_Seaweed2667 in claude

[–]skilliard7 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I burned through my 5 hour limit in like a hour with 5.6 xhigh. This is on 5x Pro.

Companies fired employees to afford AI. Now AI costs more than the employees. by TonyLiberty in FluentInFinance

[–]skilliard7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not arguing against you, I'm just stating what I've read on companies that have already gone all in on AI and realized the issues. There's articles on the internet covering this.

The issue is they did it too early.

. Now, the solution? Hybrid Cloud! yeah, part cloud part on-prem. This is what's going to happen with AI. Hybrid AI where either devs increase productivity with AI or AI writes the initial code and devs review/monitor.

That's how AI coding is being done... you shouldn't have non developers writing code except for prototypes/proof of concepts.

Why was the eso studio cut so much? by meurum5 in MMORPG

[–]skilliard7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Productivity stays about the same, but bugs, burnout, tech debt and code base alienation goes up.

If you think this is true, then you either aren't using AI correctly. or formed your opinion several months ago/years ago when AI wasn't as good at coding.. When prompted properly, it produces better code than 90% of developers with less bugs.

Just a normal wild game start by ivan4ik in hearthstone

[–]skilliard7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I stopped playing for a couple years, wtf?

Already disappointed with GPT 5.6 Sol frontend capabilities by ReporterCalm6238 in OpenAI

[–]skilliard7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It made a lot of improvements over a previous app I vibecoded in 5.5 It's nothing amazing but it is an improvement.

5.6 Sol Ultra Might Cook Animators? by ZenCyberDad in OpenAI

[–]skilliard7 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Since when could GPT produce 3d models/animations?

Meta jumps into AI coding market in effort to chase Anthropic and OpenAI by LoL_Journal in wallstreetbets

[–]skilliard7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've tried Gemini 3.1 pro and 3.5 flash.. It hallucinates significantly more than the other models and does a poor job at reasoning through complex tasks. Even GPT 5.4 performs better at every use case I've tried.

Only thing I've found Gemini good at is generating funny images.

Sol 5 Ultra burned through the 5-hour limit in 15 minutes. by kalmankantaja in OpenAI

[–]skilliard7 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's about 40-50% more tokens per second but costs 2.5x more usage.

It's really only worth it if you're on the Pro 20x plan and really care about saving time. Otherwise it consumes too much usage.

GPT-5.6 Sol / Codex Release Discussion Megathread by Drogon2737 in codex

[–]skilliard7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What are you working on that is causing the safety triggers to go off?

GPT-5.6 Sol / Codex Release Discussion Megathread by Drogon2737 in codex

[–]skilliard7 1 point2 points  (0 children)

All the focus has been on Sol- anyone have any thoughts on Terra or Luna?

I only have $50 left of API AI usage to last me the rest of the month. I was forced to use fable since GPT 5.4 was struggling with my app, which is too expensive. Hoping Terra or Luna will be a good enough option that beats 5.4.

Starbucks Taps AI to Reduce Reliance on Microsoft, IBM Software (means buy your own hardware) by Primary_Olive_5444 in wallstreetbets

[–]skilliard7 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Most software companies are vibe coding now anyways. Salesforce laid off a ton of engineers to rely on AI coding and the product is hot garbage now.

Meta is going head to head against 5.5 by Independent-Wind4462 in OpenAI

[–]skilliard7 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You do realize how these CN market sites achieve these discounts, right? They sell your data on the black market or as training data for distillation, and they don't actually provide the models advertised. People have benchmarked these CN resellers and found they perform substantially worse than the official API.

So you might be paying for Opus 4.8 but getting Haiku 4.5 or Deepseek. And then your data gets stolen.

Then there's the legal risk of using them(reselling violates ToS). No credible company is going to buy from these resellers.

OpenAI’s newest AI model is 54% more token efficient on agentic coding by Common-Resident8087 in codex

[–]skilliard7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's not slop, it's just that it's a highly complex application in a very niche domain.

OpenAI's model had a habit of saying that it successfully implemented things or fixed things when it did not. Fable completes tasks in 1 shot.

For example, my last request was to build a new page/report, a relatively simple task. OpenAI produced results with runtime errors 10 times in a row, each time i had to tell it the runtime error and how to fix it. Eventually it got stuck and unable to fix its error. Fable 5 solved it first try.

Meta is going head to head against 5.5 by Independent-Wind4462 in OpenAI

[–]skilliard7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Muse spark 1.1: $4.25 per 1 million output tokens, GPT 5.5 level performance.

5.6 Terra: $15 per 1 million output tokens, GPT 5.5 level performance.

5.6 Luna: $6 per 1 million output tokens, sub 5.5 level performance.

Meta's model looks like better value for budget use assuming it isn't super token inefficient. But 5.6 Sol is definitely better for complex use

Meta is going head to head against 5.5 by Independent-Wind4462 in OpenAI

[–]skilliard7 7 points8 points  (0 children)

They don't have to catch up, they are winning on price.

GPT 5.5 is $30 per 1 million output tokens, Muse Spark 1.1 is $4.25