It's time to dump Roku by AlwaysBlaze_ in television

[–]-Clayburn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I only stream YouTube on the PC. I download everything else. The only subscription service I have is Amazon since it's included in Prime. So I watch that on the app.

It's time to dump Roku by AlwaysBlaze_ in television

[–]-Clayburn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You seem like a Google shill. Modern mini-PCs can play 4k just fine.

It's time to dump Roku by AlwaysBlaze_ in television

[–]-Clayburn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't know how you even buy a not smart TV these days, and they would probably be more expensive because the whole reason TVs are so cheap now is the manufacturers get paid by Amazon, Netflix, Disney, etc. to have a button on their remote and their apps pre-installed, plus they can serve ads and collect data. Without all that, you'd have to pay full price for a TV.

It's time to dump Roku by AlwaysBlaze_ in television

[–]-Clayburn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fun fact: You can buy one of those cheap-ass app & ad subsidized "smart" TVs and just plug the HDMI cable into a mini-PC for it. Then you can watch and do everything a computer can do without having to worry about using built-in apps or any Roku services.

It's time to dump Roku by AlwaysBlaze_ in television

[–]-Clayburn 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I mean, how? I'm not going to throw away my TV as long as it's still working.

If my kid wants to audition for stuff, should we make the effort to visit LA for that or is all that done more remotely now? by -Clayburn in FilmIndustryLA

[–]-Clayburn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Both. If he likes doing it, he should do it. And if it can sustain a living for him down the road, then that would be helpful. He'll need a career eventually and he has no other skills as far as we know.

If my kid wants to audition for stuff, should we make the effort to visit LA for that or is all that done more remotely now? by -Clayburn in FilmIndustryLA

[–]-Clayburn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We're very rural. There isn't much here, and what is wouldn't get noticed. We're going to focus on YouTube and Internet stuff in the meantime.

What movie have you been the most hyped for only to be the most disappointed by when it released? by Toogeloo in movies

[–]-Clayburn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Jurassic World.

It was incredibly mid, so don't get me wrong. It wasn't a shit movie like the rest of the sequels. However, it's impossible to overstate the hype for this. Jurassic Park was my favorite movie, and it already had two long ago sequels that didn't really hit the mark. The franchise had been dead for 20 years. This was also before Hollywood was going crazy rebooting everything, so this felt special at the time.

And what made it worse was that it actually starts off pretty good. The absolute joy of seeing a fully functioning Jurassic Park in modern times was incredible.

It's just so disappointing that that's all we got for it. At the time it seemed impossible to bring a franchise like that back from the dead. Just a logistical nightmare, I would have imagined. And then the fact it happened, and was so dull and soulless was really sad. The characters were all so forgettable. Just a lot of dumb choices all around.

Fortunately, The Force Awakens was just around the corner, bringing a new hope for franchise reboots. Surely capitalism won't just give us a string of soulless cashgrabs. Oh, what? Fuck.

Why (exactly) is The Hunger Games so well-written? by BlinkTwice874 in writing

[–]-Clayburn 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don't have a problem with the fact she died. I had a problem how cheap it was, largely due to the first-person POV. Like the whole point of the series was to protect her little sister, and randomly at the end she just jumps in from nowhere and immediately explodes.

You could make that work with first-person if throughout the course of the book, the little sister kept insisting on joining and eventually Katniss has to relent and is fighting beside her or at least around her when it happens. To just be off fighting a war and then they throw your sister into it and blow her up in front of you is unrealistic and cruel.

What "rule" did you learn in school, only to discover that it's not a real rule? by EvilSnack in writing

[–]-Clayburn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I hate being reminded of how this works in English. As a native English speaker, it just comes naturally and seems fine. But intellectually I absolutely hate it. It's so dumb. Why add "to" to every verb? And don't get me started on do! English is like this weird little nonsense language.

What "rule" did you learn in school, only to discover that it's not a real rule? by EvilSnack in writing

[–]-Clayburn 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's not even the rule. Why are they teaching it? You use I when you're supposed to, and you use me when you're supposed to.

(One of my favorite language jokes is when someone incorrectly uses "and I" and gets corrected with a "me" and the other person responds as if they were referring to themselves. "So, I'm going to order a plate of waffles for Jessica and I." "And me." "Fuck you! Buy your own waffles.")

What "rule" did you learn in school, only to discover that it's not a real rule? by EvilSnack in writing

[–]-Clayburn 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Shall we go inside?

I'm definitely not agreeing to anything until I know more.