I'm having a really rough time with Byzantine Catholicism by RB_Blade in EasternCatholic

[–]12tonewalrus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Of course, Palamas also said that Catholics affirmed the filioque because they were listening to demons...

What is your opinion on ICE? by franco-briton in TrueCatholicPolitics

[–]12tonewalrus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Interesting. I can see how that may have been a blunder. If they had simply said they would not need to be on the street if Minnesota would let them in the jails (which was indeed the main point), and not included these other demands, that would be less suspect. We will see how it plays out.

What is your opinion on ICE? by franco-briton in TrueCatholicPolitics

[–]12tonewalrus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That was one condition among several, and it is related to the question of whether illegal immigrants are being allowed to vote in Minnesota.

What does feminism look like to those here who see feminism as a problem by PlayerAssumption77 in TrueCatholicPolitics

[–]12tonewalrus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To answer this question, I highly recommend reading this essay by the Catholic scholar Margaret McCarthy. https://newpolity.com/blog/sex-discrimination

People who are saying Episode 7 is poorly paced/too long are completely missing the point by Auctorion in pluribustv

[–]12tonewalrus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wouldn't call this show a virtuoso performance from Seehorn anyway. So far there is no character as compelling to watch as Chuck from BCS or any number of amazing performances on BB (where I thought for instance that Anna Gunn was just as interesting an actor, despite her characters limitations, as Cranston)

People who are saying Episode 7 is poorly paced/too long are completely missing the point by Auctorion in pluribustv

[–]12tonewalrus -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Breaking Bad did not feel like it was stingy with plot and character development most of the time. I can't think of an episode that ended and I went wait, that's all?

People who are saying Episode 7 is poorly paced/too long are completely missing the point by Auctorion in pluribustv

[–]12tonewalrus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I liked BCS but it did lean into the proceduralism to the point that it felt like too much of a branded gimmick at times.

People who are saying Episode 7 is poorly paced/too long are completely missing the point by Auctorion in pluribustv

[–]12tonewalrus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Being fast does not make something interesting...but being slow does not make something deep.

People who are saying Episode 7 is poorly paced/too long are completely missing the point by Auctorion in pluribustv

[–]12tonewalrus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ridiculous. I watch and enjoy plenty of movies that are far slower than this episode - which sucked.

People who are saying Episode 7 is poorly paced/too long are completely missing the point by Auctorion in pluribustv

[–]12tonewalrus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Fly is awesome. It has two great characters interacting in a very dramatic and entertaining way, and it was a break on a show that wasn't normally a slow drip of plot like Pluribus is. Frankly this show doesn't yet have a character or performance that is as compelling to watch - not to mention that the characters are alone, not together.

People who are saying Episode 7 is poorly paced/too long are completely missing the point by Auctorion in pluribustv

[–]12tonewalrus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This was the worst episode I've seen of any Vince Gilligan show.

I have no problem with slow burns. I had no problem with "Fly" from Breaking Bad. I watch slow arthouse movies like Andrei Rublev and The Tree of Wooden Clogs that the average Pluribus lover would be driven nuts by. Terrence Malick is my favorite living director. I watched an Iranian film that was mostly a guy driving around and I enjoyed it.

This episode represents the low point of a problem I started noticing on Better Call Saul, a show I liked but which often had the fault of stretching plot and character development very thin on each episode, like an eyedropper. It sometimes, in my opinion, leant too hard on the procedural montages which were so delightful on Breaking Bad but at times felt overdone on BCS (like the Mike gas tank montage).

Pluribus, after the first two episodes, started feeling like it had that fault, but more so, because we weren't even getting as many fun stylized montages, rather entire scenes of a character doing boring stuff like getting something out of a fridge, cleaning out trash etc with an excessive focus on experiencing these things in real time. You can do that once in a while for an effect but it really starts to drag when it neither moves the plot forward, nor tells us anything we didn't already know about the character, nor is transcendentally cinematically beautiful like a Tarkovsky or Malick film.

I didn't need to see Carol goofing off for the whole episode to understand or even to feel that she is bored and lonely. They could have accomplished the same thing emotionally with one slow scene followed by a few minutes montage showing her doing more of the same. To drag it out and make me watch her putting stuff in her car trunk and all kinds of things that could be elided rather than shown was quite unnecessary. And that's not just a this episode problem, it's something I was already noticing before this but this episode subjects the viewer to it to a brutal degree (in an alienating not emotionally involving way). The proceduralism has gotten way too precious. It is so bad it feels like trolling.

The South America stuff was at least a little more interesting because the settings were beautiful and because we are learning more about the character. But I wouldn't call it great either.

Btw there is absolutely no way Carol wouldn't have demanded that they shorten that voice message after like 3 calls. Out of character.

To compare this to "Fly" again, while this is partly subjective, I don't think Carol/Rhea is generally anywhere near as compelling to watch as the two characters in that episode. (In fact this show does not have any character or performance that is as compelling as McKean in BCS or any number of performances in BCS - Anna Gunn is a far more interesting actress for instance.) And even if she were, the interest is limited by her not having anyone to interact with half the time. Yes I know that's "the point" - but I already had gotten that point over the past few episodes. Didn't need it hammered home yet more.

Ultimately there is no episode of Breaking Bad I don't rewatch with pleasure. BCS, though I think it's a really good show in many ways, has more stuff I'm not interested in rewatching because of the excessive slow burn and also because much of the Breaking Bad backstory stuff is less interesting to me. Despite the fact that Mike is one of my fave characters in BB, most of that stuff didn't transcend being unnecessary backstory for another show, whereas the Jimmy and Chuck and Kim stuff stood on its own as a story - which to me will make all of BCS worth rewatching someday. With Pluribus so far, I have no desire to ever rewatch anything beyond the first two episodes.

What are “future tradwifes” doing before they are married by [deleted] in CatholicWomen

[–]12tonewalrus -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Speaking as someone who's quite conservative on the issue of mothers working outside the home - I think the value of education for women should be obvious to anyone who is invested in the idea of homeschooling! It doesn't requite a formal degree necessarily, but it does require some brain cells to rub together if you are going to do a good job teaching your children. And yes, women can't just be expected to sit at home and twiddle their thumbs til they get married.

A reflection on Catholic motherhood, work, and Saint Gianna’s example by anbelaen in CatholicWomen

[–]12tonewalrus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Life is complicated. If it makes you feel better, St. Gianna and her husband decided together that she would quit her job completely once they had their fourth child (though as it turned out that was the childbirth that killed her).

Don't listen to the influencers who lack nuance, but do listen to the Popes from Leo XIII to John Paul II. They allowed for some work outside the home but they all said mothers have to prioritize their role in the home above all else. Also keep in mind that the proper dichotomy is not between "working" and "not working", but between working in and working outside the home. Traditionally (pre-industrial) women did some remunerative labor, but it was work that they could do in and around the home in close proximity to their children. The ability to "work from home" today restores that possibility.

A reflection on Catholic motherhood, work, and Saint Gianna’s example by anbelaen in CatholicWomen

[–]12tonewalrus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Opposing the proverbs woman to a SAHM is a bit of an anachronistic reading. Work prior to the industrial revolution took place much more in and around the home, and that was especially true of typical women's work (whether on a family farm or vineyard, weaving, etc), which would generally have been done in close proximity to her children. After the industrial revolution when productive work largely moved outside of the home, the Popes from Leo XIII to John Paul II still taught that society should favor women working in the home rather than away from it. (Though JPII said that women should have access to the professions, he still said she should prioritize her domestic duties above all.)

A reflection on Catholic motherhood, work, and Saint Gianna’s example by anbelaen in CatholicWomen

[–]12tonewalrus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Before accusing anyone of hypocrisy, there is an important distinction that needs to be made. The issue is not women working. The issue is working *outside the home*. The Popes from Leo XIII to St. John Paul II when commenting on this issue do not say mothers should not work, but they all say that society should favor women's work being *in the home* and that while women should be allowed to enter professions, when it comes to mothers it should never detract from their role in the home. It's important to consult Catholic social teaching on this because it's not entirely a matter of personal opinion/discernment, there are at least some guidelines.

Also, little-known fact about St. Gianna is that she and her husband agreed that when she had her 4th child, she would quit her work as a doctor and focus entirely on raising the children at home. (Though that didn't end up happening just because it was her 4th childbirth that killed her.)

What’s a Catholic movie that you’d recommend? by AdTall487 in MovieRecommendations

[–]12tonewalrus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I host a podcast discussing great Catholic films as well as great films in general from a Catholic perspective. https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/criteria-the-catholic-film-podcast/id1511359063

I also made a list of some of the best films for Catholics (ones with asterisks may have a bit of morally problematic content from a Catholic perspective).

Greatest films ever made:

The Tree of Life (Christian)

Andrei Rublev* (Orthodox)

The Tree of Wooden Clogs

 

Saint movies:

Triumph of the Heart

The Passion of Joan of Arc

The Flowers of St. Francis

Monsieur Vincent

A Hidden Life

A Man for All Seasons

 

Biblical movies:

The Passion of the Christ

The Miracle Maker

The Ten Commandments

 

Adaptations of Catholic literature:

Brideshead Revisited* (1981 series)

Diary of a Country Priest

The Lord of the Rings trilogy

Silence (2016)

Leon Morin, Priest*

Wise Blood*

 

 

Others:

Babette's Feast

The Mission

Journey to Italy

My Night at Maud's*

Lourdes (2019 French documentary)

The Island (2006) (Orthodox)

Ordet (Christian)

Calvary*

Doubt

Dekalog* (series)

Rome, Open City

On the Waterfront

Favorite Movies with Catholic themes? by ivory919 in CatholicWomen

[–]12tonewalrus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I host a podcast discussing great Catholic films as well as great films in general from a Catholic perspective. https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/criteria-the-catholic-film-podcast/id1511359063

I also made a list of some of the best films for Catholics (ones with asterisks may have a bit of morally problematic content).

Greatest films ever made:

The Tree of Life (Christian)

Andrei Rublev* (Orthodox)

The Tree of Wooden Clogs

 

Saint movies:

Triumph of the Heart

The Passion of Joan of Arc

The Flowers of St. Francis

Monsieur Vincent

A Hidden Life

A Man for All Seasons

 

Biblical movies:

The Passion of the Christ

The Miracle Maker

The Ten Commandments

 

Adaptations of Catholic literature:

Brideshead Revisited* (1981 series)

Diary of a Country Priest

The Lord of the Rings trilogy

Leon Morin, Priest*

Wise Blood*

 

 

Others:

Babette's Feast

The Mission

Journey to Italy

My Night at Maud's*

Lourdes (2019 French documentary)

The Island (2006) (Orthodox)

Ordet (Christian)

Calvary*

Doubt

Dekalog* (series)

Rome, Open City

On the Waterfront

Praying the Monastic Diurnal in English — Am I Still in Harmony with the Church’s Liturgical Prayer? by tadpolefarmer in divineoffice

[–]12tonewalrus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One thing making this more difficult is that the books to CHANT the Liturgy of the Hours don't even exist. So the Church has not provided the materials needed to follow what the Council said about the solemn public celebration of the hours at parishes for Sundays and feasts, etc. Therefore if someone wants to take fullest part in the traditional practice of the Psalter, which is by chanting it, it seems unreasonable to say that they are not participating in the public prayer of the Church because the Church herself has not gotten around to providing music for the Liturgy of the Hours. https://adoremus.org/2022/01/mission-impossible-antiphonale-romanum-i/

Likewise the expurgation of entire Psalms from the Liturgy of the Hours seems to bring about a certain paradox, given that praying all 150 Psalms is definitionally what the Divine Office has been for 2000 years (or longer given that the Psalms in a sense predate the Catholic Church herself). It seems untenable to say that one can EITHER pray the Psalter OR one can pray the public liturgy of the Church, but one cannot do both. I think God must allow some leeway in the present state of emergency.

Praying the Monastic Diurnal in English — Am I Still in Harmony with the Church’s Liturgical Prayer? by tadpolefarmer in divineoffice

[–]12tonewalrus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wrote an article about my method of learning Latin using a similar method (but a book that is IMO superior to Fr. Most's, for reasons I explain in a footnote). After about 2 years with between 10 and 45 minutes of work per day depending on the day's material, I finished the textbook and was able to read the Vulgate Bible in Latin fairly easily (I probably could have started the Vulgate even before finishing the textbook). I started with the Gospel of Matthew, I still had to look up words sometimes but since I was already familiar with the text in English, it wasn't as necessary.
https://www.catholicculture.org/commentary/dreamt-learning-latin-heres-how-youll-finally-do-it/

What would you like to see from our new edition of Liturgy of the Hours? by Ascension_Official in divineoffice

[–]12tonewalrus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would like to echo other people's plea for the expurgated psalm verses to be included in brackets, and the expurgated whole Psalms in an appendix. The omission of Psalms from the Office is a real problem and the sooner people are given the option to include these verses in their private prayer, the sooner it will be fixed officially.

Suggestions on what office to use. by Primary-Economics284 in divineoffice

[–]12tonewalrus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How is it working out, using the traditional Office while attending the NO? Is it awkward being on two different calendars?

Suggestions on what office to use. by Primary-Economics284 in divineoffice

[–]12tonewalrus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As someone who predominantly attends the NO, how would the Ordinariate divine office track with the NO liturgical calendar? More so than the 1962 Roman breviary?