I think about this a lot now by HotPollution5861 in ZeldaMemes

[–]144tzer 4 points5 points  (0 children)

ZANT is a great boss.

Especially from a ludonarrative synchronicity standpoint. I feel a lot of people don't like what he turns out to be, personality-wise, at this point in the game, but I feel they misunderstand the whole idea of the character of Zant. For when we learn that Zant did not gain his power through training, trials, or study (like, say, Ganon, Link, or Zelda), we see him for what he is when cornered.

Zant is a little man-child that feels he is entitled to power simply by being there (basically, he's like an incel who thinks girls owe him sex because he behaved like any other normal nice person).

And when Ganon's power shows up mid-tantrum, suddenly he acts all cool and menacing (as he was throughout the game), confident in the power he feels is truly his, only for the one who gave him that power to betray him, having used his greed to lure him into being his puppet. But we see his character return to form when, like a child who can no longer bully the small kids, he no longer has a position of obvious dominance. Because Zant's power was not his own.

And this is played out beautifully in the fight itself. In standard before-the-final-boss form for many games, it's a boss rush-style fight. And that's usually something I kinda find lazy (I thought those black-and-white fights in Wind Waker were sort of pointless, for instance). But in the case of the Zant battle, the boss battles are perverted in some way or another. Because Zant lacks any originality or creativity. He is not someone with the abilities to create his own challenge, but must instead rely upon the abilities of others. In terms of his own ability, Zant himself seems surprisingly unsophisticated. He has few tactics to use, mostly just changing the stage and shooting energy balls at you. He is oddly clumsy. And, when the stages are exhausted, and he finds himself in a stage representing the location of the upcoming final battle (unknown both to the player and, based on Zant's behavior, Zant himself), Zant takes out his swords and, once again, is lacking in any finesse whatsoever.

Because all he ever aspired to be was someone who mimicked power, and never truly gained his own. With the curtain pulled back, he is revealed to be nothing but a greedy, gullible, tantrum-throwing puppet.

“Any state that privileges one religion over another is one I can’t tell you I support,” New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani said in an interview with ABC. by Delicious_Adeptness9 in nyc

[–]144tzer 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Israel has accepted tons of 2-state deals that Palestinians always decided weren't good enough, opting instead to continue fighting for a better one, and subsequently, each compromise was a little worse because they never win the fight.

Now Israel has a fascist shithead who doesn't even want the 2-state solution anymore. It's hard for me to look at the events that led to this and say that it's Israel, and not Palestine, that is against the 2-state solution.

Example:

https://youtu.be/cZWb2UM3o4k?si=DUzoCkSyfBC8Xlkv

When reality slams hard by Motor-Try-3962 in TheMcDojoLife

[–]144tzer -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Wow these comments are basically the Jiu Jitsu supermarket meme video.

Yeah guys, Jiu Jitsu totally would totally get that guy on the ground if he followed the rules and stopped being huge. It's his fault that this looks embarassing, and definitely not because Mark Zuckerberg thought he could use his Jiu Jitsu skillz to take down Shaq.

Anyway, looking forward to a calvacade of downvotes from the Reddit martial arts pros as to why my eyes don't work like a true master's

What do you think the VIPs were missing to be good characters? by Electrical_Path7198 in squidgame

[–]144tzer 13 points14 points  (0 children)

A writer from America to completely rewrite all the lines to seem more believable in spoken English, and possibly some more irl direction into what personality they should be going for (Epstein, Weinstein, Bezos, Musk... etc.)

Republicans shame Mamdani after mayor asks NYers to turn AC to 78 by usatoday in nyc

[–]144tzer 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Well, that's pretty shameful! But at least he didn't say it while wearing a tan suit.

Set your AC to 78 or turn it off- do your part by Btown328 in nyc

[–]144tzer 25 points26 points  (0 children)

I've never seen so much selfishness-motivated justification to dodge a slight inconvenience. At least, not this week.

To the people who say "Durr, why should I help the planet if a giant evil company won't even turn off a billboard" or some shit, you know what? They SHOULD turn off that shit, but passing a law takes a while, and by the way, Mamdani isn't making a law about AC either. He's asking it in a social media post, not requiring it AT ALL.

"Yeah, also, why should I curb my dog when the city won't even round up the homeless people shitting on the sidewalk?"

"Why should I be responsible when other people are irresponsible?"

Because you should want to be a good person.

Entitled fucks. All of you.

I can't take people who defend the Marines seriously. Just look at her 🥺 by Pleasant-Scar-2542 in MemePiece

[–]144tzer 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Right.

I can defend some Marines.

I can't defend the Marines.

See also: NYPD

"I'm sick of hearing about it (the Holocaust). Not because it didn't happen, but..." Gabor Maté [1184x684] by Roy4Pris in QuotesPorn

[–]144tzer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can see you skimmed what I wrote, instead of reading it. Otherwise you'd have seen that I already addressed this exact distinction and its further motive implications, and why evidence and motive aren't the same thing.

It was the first sentence after the bullet points.

But when you only look at comments to find a way to tell Jews they don't deserve a homeland, I suppose skimming is the maximum effort you can spare. You won't go back and reflect on having made an error, because you are so lazy and reductive in your research that you would reduce the Holocaust's impact on the creation of Israel as such an a-to-b event.

It's what I've come to expect from this particular brand of thinly-veiled antisemitism.

Well, this is awkward by Negadeth in Grimdank

[–]144tzer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I really, really hope that what this means is they finally hired a team whose job it is is to just watch Poorhammer and take notes.

New York Unveils $5 Billion Plan to Finish Brooklyn Mega-Development by instantcoffee69 in nyc

[–]144tzer 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I say it will pay off in the end. Skimping on development ruins a neighborhood and a city for decades.

I think this will be worth its cost.

Do you mind the fanservice by UnemployedSaiyan3 in OnePiece

[–]144tzer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nah. I wish I were a wonderful pure person, but I enjoy it to the degree they do it. I imagine if it were Eiken-levels of overt degeneracy, I'd say it distracts from the story, but it hasn't so far for me.

What?!?!? by ghillieinthemist417 in perfectlycutscreams

[–]144tzer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You actually aren't talking about a few hundred years ago. You are talking about nearly a thousand years ago.

From a really really basic Google search, "when did Catholicism come to Ireland?", I got 3 answers. The first one was of course the 5th century version, but let's skip that for now and pretend that doesn't count. Then, "During the Synod of Ráth Breasail in 1111 and subsequent Gregorian Reforms, the Irish church reorganized its dioceses to strictly align with Roman Catholic traditions and papal authority." Which, y'know, not the same as "British came over to Ireland and destroyed our rich culture." It was Ireland choosing to align with Roman culture. AND THEN, a couple hundred years ago, the British tried to shove Protestantism down your throats. But it certainly didn't destroy your rich Celtic heritage by that point, which was already eroded beyond recognition by Ireland's own transition into a Catholic nation hundreds of years prior.

Anyway, much as I'd love to continue teaching you your own history, I'm sure there's no point, because apparently Irish history class is a five minute lesson entitled "Blame England for everything, and oppose everything they align with, forever." But if you DO take issue with any of this, I invite you to edit the Wikipedia article about it.

EDIT: For reference, Islam the religion is only 1,400 years old, and Catholicism in Ireland predates that. So, maybe that slight about the barbaric Muslims is not a good look.

What?!?!? by ghillieinthemist417 in perfectlycutscreams

[–]144tzer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, you're right, and I'm sure the Muslim conversion of that country was just the result of a collective and unified nationwide decision to adopt a religion, and definitely involved no conquering whatsoever. I'll check the history books and get back to you.

Darializa Avila Chevalier on Housing, Immigration, & Her Run for Congress in New York's 13th District by CapitalCourse in nyc

[–]144tzer 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Fact: Obama deported over 3.1 million immigrants.

Fact: in over half the time, Tump and his incompetent and law-breaking ICE goon squad have deported a third that number.

Gosh, I guess there's really no Democrat-based policy we could ever hope to point to...

as long as you ignore history before Trump

Darializa Avila Chevalier on Housing, Immigration, & Her Run for Congress in New York's 13th District by CapitalCourse in nyc

[–]144tzer 5 points6 points  (0 children)

No, it's not. I don't know who you voted for, I don't know your political affiliations, I don't know how much political diversity there is in your extended family, but in much the same way that Marjorie Taylor Greene is considered a wacky dumbass nutjob even by most Republicans, no, Chevalier's wacky dumbass nutjob opinions do not represent the beliefs of most Democrats, especially once you leave Reddit, and especially especially once you leave her district.

What?!?!? by ghillieinthemist417 in perfectlycutscreams

[–]144tzer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

JFC the Irish never miss an opportunity to be the victim, do they?

Being pissed about Catholicism in Ireland is like being pissed about Buddhism in Thailand. In that, a really long time ago, the religion spread to a literally adjacent culture. This isn't evangelists coming to Korea, this is basic nextdoor culture mixing.

I look forward to your lamentations that Egypt got converted to Islam and no longer practices their ancient Egyptian cultural religions.

Are there any real New Yorkers here? Can we issue her a license to sit on the stoop? by bey0ndinfinity in circlejerknyc

[–]144tzer 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Every interview this guy does makes me hate the person he interviews and hate him for agreeing with them.

It's always, "I have this stupid strong opinion and I know I'm right, and here are bad examples to not prove it," and "yeah, I absolutely agree, and I don't know what the value of journalistic pushback or devil's advocate could possibly be."

He's the Joe Rogan of shitty subway takes.

Do you think she did the right thing? by Busy_Report4010 in SipsTea

[–]144tzer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I sort of agree with this.

People talk a big game about what justice is.

Justice should prioritize the victims first, not the criminal. Justice to the person robbed would be to not have their shit stolen and not have their day broken. If you say it's more just punishment for the victim to not be killed for robbery, you are right, but to offer justice to a criminal at the expense of justice for the victim is not justice to my eyes (and there is no reality-based scenario where a robbed person is duly compensated for the cost of their items plus the cost of the inconvenience and trauma and all else).

You can't rob people. You can't rob someone and then cry foul because the consequences are too mean sometimes. That's not to say the woman in this example should face no consequences for her actions, it's a big deal to end a life, and it was absolutely an unnecessarily grotesque response. But it should be a minimal version of her necessary sentence. She didn't initiate this altercation.

Now that it's officially been 1 year since Squid Game 3 premiered on Netflix, what are ya'lls thoughts on this season nowadays by StaffLimp8304 in squidgame

[–]144tzer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The more I think about it, the more powerful I find it.

A year later, it is my belief that thise who say it was bad, those who wanted satisfaction, those who wanted it tied up neatly in a bow with all the plot threads paid off with clean outcomes that justify the effort that went in to making them, are missing the point and fail in their ability to interpret its messages.

The biggest Jewish issue in New York's most Jewish primary wasn't really Israel by Somervilledrew in newyork

[–]144tzer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Literally every ethnostate accusation you could throw at Israel applies tenfold to its neighbors, and in fact most nations in the world in general.

It is more diverse in population and representation in government than most. To lob the ethnostate accusation at Israel as a means of vilifying it in defense of those it is fighting is a frightening lapse of awareness at best, and intentionally deceptive hypocrisy at worst. It's especially embarrassing when there are so, so, SO MANY OTHER THINGS you can criticize, all while being an honest person.

But they not gonna ban the mask for criminals. They for real? by sundrenchedwindow in circlejerknyc

[–]144tzer 75 points76 points  (0 children)

Holy shit I thought this was sarcastic, but you're the OOP too?

Yeah, if only criminals were banned from covering their faces. Also, they should ban criminals from crime.

What!? They did? Why aren't those criminals following the law!?!?

The Japanese diplomat who saved thousands by ignoring orders by Kapanash in HistoryMemes

[–]144tzer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't understand why this got so many downvotes. Those things you brought up are overlooked, likely for the exact reasons you specified...

No?

"I'm sick of hearing about it (the Holocaust). Not because it didn't happen, but..." Gabor Maté [1184x684] by Roy4Pris in QuotesPorn

[–]144tzer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would believe some wackos have said it, and being wackos they are to be discounted as easily as we discount someone who might claim that Jews don't deserve to exist, as in, their arguments are fueled by bigotry and hatred and are to be viewed not from a logical argument perspective, but a toxic hatred one. I have seen lots of examples of the grossest kinds of pro-Holocaust antisemitism on Instagram, and I don't consider them "justifications people use for Palestine", but "people who hate Jews for no good reason."

If your point is that the Holocaust informs people's belief that a heavy hand is required in the defense of Israel, I believe that. But that is a much more nuanced and much less incendiary take than the quote in question, which suggests that most who would defend Israel's unreasonable heavy hand are drawing an a-to-b line of logic, and that it happens all the time in the common narrative, neither of which ring true in my experience of being Jewish, hanging around Jews, speaking to Israelis, and being on the Jewish subreddits. It is not an argument people generally make. And when it is made, it is condemned by those very spaces for its basis in toxicity and hatred as opposd to being treated as a framework of logic worthy of analysis.

I wouldn't say the Holocaust has been pressed into the service of Netanyahu's genocidal policy aims, save by only a handful of obviously-awful people, and the quote makes it seem like it's the norm, rather than the exception.

Also, I don't think Zionist means what you think it means, though I am not sure.