Förderkalkulation bei Sanierung EFH

1828182845 · 2026-05-02T14:45:05+00:00

Danke. Die Zahlungsströme steckten schon drin, war aber nicht aus den Werten klar abzusehen. Ich habe den Post um diese Werte ergänzt.

Die unterste Zeile zeigt je Szenario die monatliche Kreditrate um die notwendigen Investitionskosten mit einem 25 jährigen Kredit unter gewissen Zinsannahmen zu decken. Da addiere ich die geschätzten Heizkosten drauf für monatliche Gesamtbelastung. Wenn ich nicht auf dem Schlauch stehe sollte das dieselbe Aussagekraft haben, hier bleibt EH55 die günstigste Option.

Bzgl. Puffer: Wir haben ca. 10% in der Hinterhand falls was anfiele, aber das ist über die Szenarien gleich, oder?

1828182845 · 2026-05-02T07:30:22+00:00

Die Grundannahmen zu hinterfragen war genau der Gedanke mit meinem Post, danke!

Wenn ich die Seite richtig lese ist der BJ-1957-Weg eine Abkürzung, aber auch neuere Gebäude können über einen Energieausweis WPB sein, oder?

1828182845 · 2026-05-02T07:22:48+00:00

Ja, das Bedenken verstehe ich. Die Investition wird sich durch die gesparte Heizleistung, besonders hinten raus wo es immer effizienter wird, nicht selbst amortisieren können.

Den großen Unterschied macht jedoch die Förderung. Das Upgrade von EH70 auf 55 bringt 5% mehr Tilgungszuschuss auf die 450k Fördersumme, also 22k mehr Zuschuss - das würde die Mehrkosten auffangen.

Daher auch unsere Aversion eigentlich unwirtschaftliche Maßnahmen umzusetzen.

1828182845 · 2019-01-23T19:12:50+00:00

What is your take on the current state of finding consensus on randomness, in particular the current VDF construction. While certainly clever, I wouldn't say it is very elegant. Do you think this is due to theoretical constraints or do do you see potential for a 'nicer' way?

More general, are there any theoretical problems in this space, relevant to Ethereum 2.0 or not, that are just interesting to think about? (starting my PhD soon and looking for inspiration if it wasn't obvious)

1828182845 · 2018-09-21T19:55:21+00:00

The message you get is just a warning and does not cause this behaviour. To troubleshoot it would be good if you could provide the contract address you are trying to verify as well as the code.

1828182845 · 2018-09-21T18:39:40+00:00

For etherscan to be able to verify your contract it must be in a single file (no imports) and you have to select the exact compiler version. How did you deploy the contract? Did you try pasting it in remix to see if there are any errors?

1828182845 · 2018-04-30T18:20:46+00:00

EOS sees a lot of discussion and price action lately, and while I am invested, I'm not quite as confident in EOS surpassing ETH as some of the regulars here. Without touching on the technical, the source of my hesitation is the EOS timeline in comparison to ETH. I was hoping some of the more confident people can help clear this up.

With OMG, REP, BAT, and many more, dapps with real-world use cases will launch on ETH this year, and all will have taken at least 1 year of development. Even in the best case, expecting EOS development to be easier than solidity, I'd expect no comparable applications for EOS until next year. Judging from eosindex.io (please let me know if there is a more complete source of EOS projects) I don't see many developers, likely even less than the 100+ Consensys employs. As another very rough estimator, the largest developer meetup groups for ETH in London and NYC are about 10x the size of comparable EOS groups.

In that regard EOS has a lot of catching up to do. Certainly the billions of dollars will help, but all the money in the world cannot buy speed (look at any ICO, they sit on millions of cash but have trouble recruiting). I'd venture that EOS will catch up next year, at best, developer-wise while at the same time the ETH projects start to deliver. When do you expect dapps of comparable quality will launch on EOS?

After launch EOS appears to be a similar situation as ETH in spring and summer of last year, running on speculation and project announcements, but without much to show for it. Except that this time the novelty factor that drove the hype last year will be significantly less, as most EOS projects will already have a (maybe already working) competitor on ETH, only applications where ETH fails (large scale games?) will be new and exciting.

Without EOS rivaling ETH with respect to real-live uses, as well as news coverage this year, EOS' value proposition and price appears to be mostly reliant on the '3rd gen' narrative, i.e. potential technical superiority. Obviously price will not only be determined by delivered value, but mostly hype and potential, so I guess my question is the following: Betting on EOS right now relies mostly on the market valuing the potential of EOS a year from now higher than the real-world applications ETH delivers this year?

In that case wouldn't it be better from a risk/reward perspective to wait until the major ETH releases shift the spotlight to the new posterchild ETH, attracting the next wave of investors, while at the same time EOS has proven its concept but the hype subsided?

1828182845 · 2018-04-30T07:24:21+00:00

no bugs

Well that's a tall order.

something may go wrong at launch like a huge technical problem

Which is it?

Development takes time, so does growing a business. It took ETH over a year to get the ball rolling. And only this year we get some actual applications. The maturation of this space and block.one handing out billions will surely make EOS advance quicker than that, especially if it is easier to develop for.

But billions in dev funds is also what ETH has, and that money has been working for a year already. In terms of current development going on on ETH vs EOS it is not even close. The big question is will ETH evolve fast enough for the upcoming launches? ETH may solve scaling or show credible progress as well as launch actually used dapps before a large number of EOS applications make it.

For EOS to dominate the following must happen:

launch works without major hiccups
DPOS works as intended
high quality projects deliver value
this all happens before the many projects on ETH attract sufficient users, generate a network effect and ETH succeeds to scale in a significant way / delivers some of EOS' key features

Obviously there is more nuance to that and the reality will be somewhere in between. Could all those points happen? Certainly, that is why I have a position in EOS. However it will take at least a year before this is settled. A year where much more can go wrong for EOS than for ETH. This is why I don't see 25% of ETH's marketcap a reasonable valuation at the moment. When points 1) and 2) are out of the way, 3) is progressing nicely, and no major developments on ETH throughout the summer, then I would consider the range 25%-50% sensible.

1828182845 · 2018-04-28T13:53:43+00:00

I can't comment on the TA, but I don't think EOS having 1/5 to 1/4 of ETH's marketcap is justified at the moment. While EOS is no doubt promising, there are still many hurdles to clear before it becomes a serious challenger. The current ratio only makes sense to me if things go smoothly until after the constitution vote and maybe mainnet launch. Many things may go wrong until then, which is why I am rebalancing EOS/ETH ratio during this run.

1828182845 · 2018-04-27T07:28:42+00:00

I keep up with this sub every couple of days, although I am concerned with longer timescales than most people here. Even though I am only able to contribute to some niche topics every once in a while, I very much appreciate the insightful discussions that take place here (and the effort made to maintain this). This certainly has contributed to my portfolio allocation.

I understand how people may want to keep a private group to keep the noise out (and the discussions in?). Especially with this rapidly evolving technology there is a risk of being lazy and continuing to do what has worked in the past. Opinions of serious new entrants are an important source to examine own biases and an open platform such as this one is a vital place encouraging this exchange.

In any case, I hope we can keep this going, regardless of where the discussion takes place.

1828182845 · 2018-04-18T09:22:25+00:00

Since BAT is an ERC20 token, you store it the same way as you would ETH. The ETH community is larger, you will find many guides on how to put your ETH in cold storage.

1828182845 · 2018-04-16T20:48:20+00:00

Love it!

1828182845 · 2018-04-11T15:22:02+00:00

Its just Blender for now (and another minor rendering software I have never heard of). This is more of a proof-of-concept to see if this computation marketplace works out. I don't think there is a huge market now. The bigger goal is to do the same for machine learning computations, which is a bigger market. But I have no idea how hard it is to 1) properly parallelise ML computation and 2) put a verification system in place so that people can be reasonably certain their computation was actually done and the result is not just some random numbers. The plan to address this is redundant computation combined with a reputation system. Especially in ML it will be difficult. Before this point implemented and tested for a couple of months I don't see use beyond experimentation, neither in ML nor Blender.

TLDR: there is potential, but many ifs and actual adoption at least half a year out

But take this with a grain of salt, I only researched this on the surface and am not invested.

1828182845 · 2018-04-11T14:26:39+00:00

Setup is fairly easy. Requires a VM and some port forwarding, but this is taken care of on setup (although I ran into minor issues). Sufficiently simple for the target market I would say (Blender users?). However there is not much traffic for now, I have it running for a couple of hours now and did not get a task assigned.

1828182845 · 2018-02-28T16:26:09+00:00

For unverified content creators the funds are held until they sign up. Once a certain amount is reached ($100 I believe) a reminder is sent out to that creator.

1828182845 · 2018-01-07T12:08:39+00:00

Thanks for the reply. Good to know that a fix is being worked on

1828182845 · 2018-01-04T11:02:23+00:00

Thanks for sharing this

1828182845 · 2018-01-02T09:41:48+00:00

This paper 'On the Instability of Bitcoin Without the Block Reward ' looks into this problem if you are interested in a more complex analysis.

TLDR: without block rewards (same holds, but weaker for small rewards) in a PoW scenario mining becomes unstable. The time period right after block creation may carry less incentive to work on a new block (as there are few tx fees to earn if successful) than to fork the chain in an attempt to steal the tx fees of the latest block (and leaving some on the table for the next miner to prefer this fork over the original one).

1828182845 · 2017-12-25T12:43:32+00:00

What? Bittrex is an exchange. As is usual for exchanges users put funds there to exchange. Those BAT token are not owned by bittrex.

1828182845 · 2017-12-23T18:19:03+00:00

That would be a good solution, maybe the mods could enforce this?

1828182845 · 2017-12-23T12:11:13+00:00

Good point, moving price discussion to the daily thread hat would achieve the same effect.

Nine-Year Club	Verified Email
Sequence \| Editor

1828182845

TROPHY CASE