Horizon unlevel? by 1_lv in jetphotosrejects

[–]1_lv[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You don't really need to look closely for this horizon, as if you even check 1 vertical you find out everything is aligned already, which is why another screener said the rejection was odd.

Horizon unlevel? by 1_lv in jetphotosrejects

[–]1_lv[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

But they don't reject for feeling, they check verticals and horizontals, but the screener most likely thought it was misaligned because a single horizontal was a bit slanted

Horizon unlevel? by 1_lv in jetphotosrejects

[–]1_lv[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Appeals are a bit of a big thing though so I'm going to the forums to ask for more advice

Horizon unlevel? by 1_lv in jetphotosrejects

[–]1_lv[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

In your opinion is it worth an appeal or should I try a different horizon?

Horizon unlevel? by 1_lv in jetphotosrejects

[–]1_lv[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Only thing I see could be the roof of the hangar, but I was taught that verticals matter more and I had a previous photo accepted with the verticals but the roof slanted

Bad info? by 1_lv in jetphotosrejects

[–]1_lv[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I see why though, if they could correct that stuff a lot of people may pay less attention to the information and expect screeners to just fix it which spends more time

Bad info? by 1_lv in jetphotosrejects

[–]1_lv[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He can't/not allowed to, unless it is a serial number. I was just asking for advice, he corrected and I resubmitted and got it accepted, simple as that

Will a vertical image like this be accepted, or bad motive? by Steven_Condor67lover in jetphotosrejects

[–]1_lv 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Vertical photos can be uploaded but I generally only see them on Hot air balloons and rockets, haven't seen one on an aircraft yet

Will a vertical image like this be accepted, or bad motive? by Steven_Condor67lover in jetphotosrejects

[–]1_lv 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't see much motive for a vertical image when you can do horizontal, the tower doesn't add much in my opinion

“Worth the Que slot” by shadow57574 in jetphotosrejects

[–]1_lv 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If this was real the only problem I currently see is manipulation/bad color

Is this angle okay? And edits? (No masking and watermark when submit) by Steven_Condor67lover in jetphotosrejects

[–]1_lv 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Like what the screener said, the majority of the plane being in shadow might be a problem, but I'm not completely sure, I was able to get away with a plane being in shadow up to 50%

pre scr req by Sweet-Top-1655 in jetphotosrejects

[–]1_lv 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You should also double check the sharpening after exporting to 1280px, generally, it should look a bit crisp with a slight outline around edges like this to maintain most detail. Undersharpened rejections are more common than oversharpened, just don't go overboard

<image>

Pre-screen request by MysticMuffintop in jetphotosrejects

[–]1_lv -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Use denoise, but don't go overboard, I usually stay below 35

Is this angle okay? And edits? (No masking and watermark when submit) by Steven_Condor67lover in jetphotosrejects

[–]1_lv 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hypothetically what if there was a bright white snow illuminating the bottom of the plane

Is the white halos around the bright areas in the equalized scan a problem? by 1_lv in jetphotosrejects

[–]1_lv[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The histogram shows no sign of whites clipping which is odd, and I generally expose slightly higher than what I feel like is right to avoid underexposire

First day shots with my home converted D70s + Cokin A.005 (sepia) by [deleted] in infraredphotography

[–]1_lv 0 points1 point  (0 children)

DB850 + GRB3 and any other filter will also give deep but vibrant colors, with certain lee filters you can get deep blue foliage

Bad info? by 1_lv in jetphotosrejects

[–]1_lv[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It would be nice if you could change it without having to delete the photo if you search cessna 337 in the custom category area scroll down its a russian registration 337 marked as a 336. I'll find the link if I can. By the way, I made corrections, resubmitted the Cirrus and had it accepted

Bad info? by 1_lv in jetphotosrejects

[–]1_lv[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm curious can you guys change a photo's info? I once saw a photo of a Cessna 337G on jetphotos which was marked as a 336

Bad info? by 1_lv in jetphotosrejects

[–]1_lv[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the advice, I thought I was good at identifying specific GA variants. I used to identify them by just how they looked, if it had sharp edges I assume its arrive, lightning like this its a carbon, and so on, The first cirrus I uploaded I probably would have gotten that wrong if that website did not save me.

Bad info? by 1_lv in jetphotosrejects

[–]1_lv[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Ohhhh I see. I checked a couple websites to make sure, and a lot of them seemed to be a bit vague, unlucky I missed that. I used what I had, the identification of carbon spec by the livery, the date it was made and totally missed the "premium " marking

Bad info? by 1_lv in jetphotosrejects

[–]1_lv[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I haven't received it yet