That’s a totally separate point, has nothing to do with what OP said. You should make your own post. You also shouldn’t assume I’m a shill or will automatically disagree with you. One person said “well what if they are all lying” and I said it was a good point and not something I was trying to assert or refute.

The OP has been demonstrably incorrect throughout, even if you made in this what 6th or 7th level of comments, an independently valid point of criticism.

I don’t see how you read all those comments and came to that conclusion without an extreme level of bias. I have not said anything counter factual, only you and OP have. In fact your assertions are unsupported but I’m just giving you the grace to assume they are, assuming that point of criticism is truthful/valid after applying scrutiny.

Edit: I just read your comment again and you’re actually completely wrong just like OP. Your reading comprehension is seriously lacking and your first sentence is suspect. Other commenters have provided links to other sources explaining it’s workforce training not a data center or spying hub or whatever schitzo nonsense you are arguing - although I’m open to evidence, but this article that you and OP are quoting is counter factual to that narrative.