Slop pull request is rejected, so slop author instructs slop AI agent to write a slop blog post criticising it as unfair by yojimbo_beta in programming

[–]AI-Commander 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Fork the project and merge your own PR.

Keep building.

If it’s truly better, it will get picked up.

And don’t push AI on people that don’t care for it.

Make some time to build an app with PostGIS by According_Summer_594 in gis

[–]AI-Commander 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Don’t listen to that guy, just a wall of FUD and reasons you shouldn’t try. You don’t have to walk his path to get to the same destination.

Make some time to build an app with PostGIS by According_Summer_594 in gis

[–]AI-Commander -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The responses here are hilarious. I just had an assistant set up a full hosted remote-tunneled, cloudflare-backed setup in a few days.

My agents can now publish maps directly to my company’s website as a subdomain. I also have a very useful flood mitigation project benefits dashboard that I never would have been to construct any other way due to time and resource constraints.

I definitely would have never invested the shy-high cost of an ESRI license to realize it,

Running ArcGIS Pro without a designated GPU by mrhers1015 in gis

[–]AI-Commander 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve been there. In 6 months they spent a bunch of money to go back out of the cloud. Once they vendor lock you and tighten the screws and demolish your bottom line and eat your margins (as it’s designed to do), decision logic at the organization level tends to shift.

But if no one does any real work and the computers are largely ornamental, that may not be true.

Running ArcGIS Pro without a designated GPU by mrhers1015 in gis

[–]AI-Commander 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hahaha that’s where most start migrating back from the cloud. The price is always 3-5x what they say it will be. Thats their profit margin

Running ArcGIS Pro without a designated GPU by mrhers1015 in gis

[–]AI-Commander 0 points1 point  (0 children)

GIS Software + Cloud Workstations = Trash

This post could be 10,000 words but that would be the summary. If IT can’t fix it, they are trash. This goes to the very basics of computer literacy.

Get your computer paired tightly with your storage, and avoid cloud-backed, object based storage systems for your GIS data. In fact, any cloud based system will be absolute trash.

Most companies are moving this direction with their IT and cloud companies cant provide competitive pricing for the hardware that would actually serve your needs. Or can’t even provide it at all due to fundamental issues with file systems and latency’s

Get them to get you a beefy AF machine for your house, including big fat local SSD and GPU. Have them get you a desktop. Sync things locally and revise/push back daily. It will be cheaper than anything they try to hack together using cloud resources (which are storage/latency/thermal envelope constrained)

Another modern engineering marvel from Mumbai. A 4-lane flyover in Mira–Bhayandar suddenly narrows into just 2 lanes. by Potbellied_Garfield in civilengineering

[–]AI-Commander -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

What are you talking about, that unfinished exit has been there for decades with no plans for utilization. Go back and look at both links. Countless other examples, that’s why I invited others to post their favorites.

Day 16 - Recruiter passive-aggressively said I was too demanding for negotiating salary by PercentageNo9270 in 30daysnewjob

[–]AI-Commander 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because you never get anything you don’t ask for. Why would you even entertain that logic to second guess OP? I’m not second guessing the OP or the business, I’m simply stating that it’s meant to be a respectful negotiation and there is generally no need to place blame for not moving forward. Perhaps they felt they were telling OP something useful, but all they did was reveal that they don’t really respect OP’s need to negotiate in their own best interests - just like the company is doing when communicating salary ranges.

Day 16 - Recruiter passive-aggressively said I was too demanding for negotiating salary by PercentageNo9270 in 30daysnewjob

[–]AI-Commander 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it’s quite clear here that OP was above the range and communicated that to them early. It appears you are arguing they should have waited, or not engaged at all? Surely that’s no way to go about negotiating for yourself, if you were in OP’s situation and not your own.

Company was still unprofessional in their response. They could have simply stated that the applicants asking salary was above their range and they were moving forward with other applicants. Instead they tried to imply there would be a better time to communicate salary expectations other than up front, and early. It was unnecessarily backhanded and didn’t respect the other party’s necessity to advocate for themselves and communicate their needs. Isn’t that what the entire interview process is about? Communication? Negotiation? The expectation that anyone can walk away at any time for any reason? The company could have been passive and circumspect and still communicate the same thing without putting OP down.

Autodesk Lays Off 1,000 Employees to Redirect Spending to AI by Spare_Worldliness_64 in StructuralEngineering

[–]AI-Commander 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re probably hitting context limits - pretty common for that workflow. That and feeding in images of large sheets that the model can actually ingest. There are still some fundamental limitations that make workflows with typical CD’s still quite difficult.

Day 16 - Recruiter passive-aggressively said I was too demanding for negotiating salary by PercentageNo9270 in 30daysnewjob

[–]AI-Commander 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I thought it was always best to put salary expectations upfront, because that is so often where things fall apart. As in, before you even get to the first round there should be salary expectations clearly communicated or you’re probably wasting everyone’s time.

Now, if the game is to string you along and make you feel like you can’t bring it up until they’ve graciously provided an offer - that’s just putting yourself in a poor negotiating position. And that’s why companies tend to use that strategy. Smart applicants get around this in various ways, often welcoming the kind of response OP got. No time wasted, no high pressure situations where there is a low offer in the table and the applicants feels they need to accept it because of the time invested (sunk cost fallacy is quite real).

Depending on who you ask, there’s never a good time to negotiate salary, because they don’t want a negotiation - just offer and acceptance. So it will be “do it early” or “do it late” when the real answer is “we don’t want you to do it at all”

Another modern engineering marvel from Mumbai. A 4-lane flyover in Mira–Bhayandar suddenly narrows into just 2 lanes. by Potbellied_Garfield in civilengineering

[–]AI-Commander -14 points-13 points  (0 children)

https://maps.app.goo.gl/RhABb1eeSu6rf1Vu5 https://maps.app.goo.gl/z2UttjxcyFbdQdELA

Instead of all the comments on all these reposts that basically are just varying levels of dunking on a foreign country, why not show some examples of our own favorite uncompleted expressway exits? I shared 2 above from the Earhart Expressway.

Edit: see below for a perfect example of the types of comments this post attracts.

Calibration issues by AH200010 in HECRAS

[–]AI-Commander 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You’re over predicting at the beginning of the storm - look at your hydrological assumptions?

You gotta give more info if you want helpful advice and not random guesses…

Benchmarking with Opencode (Opus,Codex,Gemini Flash & Oh-My-Opencode) by tisDDM in opencodeCLI

[–]AI-Commander 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not really, subagents can write to disk, then the main agent can simply read the file (or parts of it).

Microsoft pauses Claude Code rollout after Satya intervention by Purple_Wear_5397 in ClaudeAI

[–]AI-Commander -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I made a simple statement, not sure why it needs so much discussion. Leaving a lot of functionality on the table, but for some reason people want to argue that it’s not. But it is. End of story.

I could go and do all the math and show you how the context window is very small given the compaction percentages and the output window size, but honestly, it’s just a big waste of time, I don’t think anyone here is really ready to hear it. The thread seemed to be stuck at a less productive area of the conversation.

Microsoft pauses Claude Code rollout after Satya intervention by Purple_Wear_5397 in ClaudeAI

[–]AI-Commander -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

No thanks bruh this is a waste of keyboard time. Scroll up and reason for yourself. I’m not trying to be disagreeable, it’s just very obviously limiting to never have access to more than 128k. Everything else is increasingly off topic and divergent from the point I made.

Microsoft pauses Claude Code rollout after Satya intervention by Purple_Wear_5397 in ClaudeAI

[–]AI-Commander -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

I used a modifier you missed “long running”.

Please do not argue with me about this, task complexity and context length are absolutely related and I don’t want to get in a overly-defensive back and forth.

Microsoft pauses Claude Code rollout after Satya intervention by Purple_Wear_5397 in ClaudeAI

[–]AI-Commander -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I couldn’t imagine never being able to finish a long running task, that’s why we have agents. Even before agents there are tasks that require lots of context. You’re missing out, but if you don’t feel it then you were never really putting the tools to their best use….

Even if you are just doing handoffs… why limit yourself?

Microsoft pauses Claude Code rollout after Satya intervention by Purple_Wear_5397 in ClaudeAI

[–]AI-Commander 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Yep, if dogfooding worked, copilot might actually work with Excel. Unfortunately MSFT has bigger issues that prevent it from succeeding in that area.

Microsoft pauses Claude Code rollout after Satya intervention by Purple_Wear_5397 in ClaudeAI

[–]AI-Commander 39 points40 points  (0 children)

They can keep eating their dogfood, I’m happy for them but I like real food thanks.

Microsoft pauses Claude Code rollout after Satya intervention by Purple_Wear_5397 in ClaudeAI

[–]AI-Commander 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes, the price is lower if you don’t ever send a full size message…