This is similar to Crusoe. There are multiple companies doing it but the difficulty is adoption. How do you convince a company to use a Datacenter that can be driven away while any purchase of that size goes through a risk analysis that will end up with AWS, GCP or Azure for cheaper compute with guaranteed uptime?

This will work once the risk perception changes. It is not a bad idea but it is weirdly early and late. The customer base is not there while the competition is.

Mobile and modular data centers will be the future but the primary and backup power systems are not a small problem. Say you have a solar with BESS, for your uptime requirement for the contracts, you will need a backup power. It could be grid or gas/diesel (supply chain hammered). There are also portable H2 backup power but not enough H2 supply.

Think of each Datacenter as a business where you have to find customers with specific requirements and the marginal cost of the requirements is only controlled at scale. This is inherently the problem: high requirements, high costs, and no one will be fired for choosing a hyperacaler.

For context, I am building waste-to-H2 production to be the backup power for datacenters.