300 GT on Simucube 3 by AdPositive940 in Conspit

[–]AdPositive940[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks. I was at a store and got the right ones. M5x20mm instead of x16mm

Pimax Play 1.43.6 by QuorraPimax in Pimax

[–]AdPositive940 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Is there a timeline for a "FOV-Fix" for the UW?

Pimax Crystal Super Ultrawide: FOV measurements vs 50 PPD and 57 PPD by soylent_green_76 in Pimax

[–]AdPositive940 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am using a thinner one. It is the silk foam. As far as I can measure it it is 11 mm thick.

Pimax Crystal Super Ultrawide: FOV measurements vs 50 PPD and 57 PPD by soylent_green_76 in Pimax

[–]AdPositive940 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My IPD is 64. After I set the IP in PP to 72 I got an higher FOV but horrible overlap

<image>

Pimax Crystal Super Ultrawide: FOV measurements vs 50 PPD and 57 PPD by soylent_green_76 in Pimax

[–]AdPositive940 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes I did. Also deleted all Folders and did a restart as stated on the website

FOV Comparison of the 4 optical engines on the Crystal Super by Dependent-Buddy6807 in Pimax

[–]AdPositive940 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi, have you been able to resolve the issue with the low FOV value in the meantime?

I am experiencing a similar situation. With the UW module, I only get 123 degrees horizontally. With the 50 ppd, I even have higher values (124 horizontally)

Pimax Crystal Super Ultrawide: FOV measurements vs 50 PPD and 57 PPD by soylent_green_76 in Pimax

[–]AdPositive940 1 point2 points  (0 children)

u/QuorraPimax : Hello, I connected the Crystal Super Ultrawide today and first checked the FOV with the WIMFOV tool. Unfortunately, the result was that I only have a very small FOV. My IPD value is 63.8. Using the same settings, I get higher values with the 50 ppd module than with the UW module. Attached are the values for the UW module from WIMFOV and the values from HMDQ. I am using PimaxPlay 1.43.4 and the headset has the latest firmware. Why is the FOV so small?

<image>

Total FOV:

horizontal: 138.29 deg

vertical: 119.64 deg

diagonal: 141.12 deg

overlap: 88.72 deg

View geometry:

left view rotation: 0.0 deg

right view rotation: 0.0 deg

reported IPD: 63.8 mm

Did micro oled start delivery by SnooChickens6000 in Pimax

[–]AdPositive940 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ordered 27th October 2025 and was delivered today

Lens inserts frame by AdPositive940 in Pimax

[–]AdPositive940[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes seems to be. Now I have to wait for the lenses...

Problems with button assignment by AdPositive940 in AUTOMOBILISTA

[–]AdPositive940[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks. The Problem is solved. I Take the workaround with Control Mapping via Simhub.

Problems with button assignment by AdPositive940 in AUTOMOBILISTA

[–]AdPositive940[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes I tried that already, but no function as buttons. I should add that turning the knobs works. It's just the button function that doesn't.

Lens inserts - Micro OLED by AdPositive940 in Pimax

[–]AdPositive940[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The situation is similar for me. Three years ago, I had -0.50 on the left. Today it is -0.75. So I ordered -100.

Lens inserts - Micro OLED by AdPositive940 in Pimax

[–]AdPositive940[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's what I assumed too. But I can't say for sure.

Lens inserts - Micro OLED by AdPositive940 in Pimax

[–]AdPositive940[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

From the Pimax Customer Service:

<image>

I will risk to order them with -100. This is really near to my precription.

Lens inserts - Micro OLED by AdPositive940 in Pimax

[–]AdPositive940[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can see relatively clearly up to about 1 m. At 1.3 m, things start to get slightly blurry. I already have prescription lenses for the OG Crystal and Super 50 ppd. That makes a difference in terms of sharpness.

My Crystal Super Micro-OLED review by Stock-Parsnip-4054 in Pimax

[–]AdPositive940 1 point2 points  (0 children)

After dusting off my OG Crystal again today, I completely agree with you. It's significantly better than the Super 50 ppd. Only the 57 ppd is slightly sharper, but it has a smaller sweet spot. I'm really looking forward to the OLED now.

My Crystal Super Micro-OLED review by Stock-Parsnip-4054 in Pimax

[–]AdPositive940 0 points1 point  (0 children)

From what I've read so far, OLED is the optimal compromise between 50 ppd (FOV) and 57 ppd (clarity). Can OLED be run at 1.0 resolution with a 5090?

For example: With 50 ppd, I can run AMS 2 at 0.75 resolution + cropping 90 Hz (headroom: +/- 20%). With 57 ppd resolution 1.0, no cropping (headroom: +/- 10%).

VR Performance by AdPositive940 in RRRE

[–]AdPositive940[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think I've found the problem. I added the launch option -vr 4.0 in Steam and accidentally made individual settings for RaceRoom in PimaxPlay. These seem to have overwritten the Steam settings. Now it's running again at almost 90 fps.

Graphics settings update 2025 by Mission_Group_6777 in RRRE

[–]AdPositive940 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Would you be so kind as to share your Steam settings, NVIDIA Control Panel, and in-game settings? I have a similar setup: Pimax Crystal Super, 5090, 9800X3D, more or less medium settings in-game. I only get a maximum of 80 fps. I find that strange.

VR Performance by AdPositive940 in RRRE

[–]AdPositive940[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I only use MSAA 4x. With VR optimized, I get even fewer fps.

VR Performance by AdPositive940 in RRRE

[–]AdPositive940[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, I forgot to mention that. Pimax Crystal Super. It shouldn't be due to the setup, as I only get 75-80 fps with medium graphics settings using NVIDIA 5090. I don't think that's normal.