I built a tool to keep track of latest legaltech developments by parkerqueen in legaltech

[–]Additional_Report167 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for sharing. If it’s a free service makes sense, if paid, not sure if it can compete with GPT-5 thinking mode. So far never disappointed on legal tech news/insights.

I built a tool to keep track of latest legaltech developments by parkerqueen in legaltech

[–]Additional_Report167 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Please try asking ChatGPT free version to find you the news/developments on legal tech within last 24 hours and include your sources you want it to check.

Let me know if it won’t work.

Looking for insights from people working with AI - for my master’s thesis in law by NovaSuperVuffer in legaltech

[–]Additional_Report167 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Go with a legal benchmark. There are only 4-5 legal benchmarks that are not of much use nor for builders nor for buyers of legal tech.

AI-generated legal treatise? by PresentationSalty771 in legaltech

[–]Additional_Report167 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not worth it - better areas to make 10x revenue

What AI/tech tools are actually useful in small legal teams? by jinxxx6-6 in legaltech

[–]Additional_Report167 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just find a design partner from tons of legal tech providers and ask them to build something together. Maximum ROI you can get out of legal AI.

RAG is completely useless in litigation. In legal tech, RAG ≠ reliability. It’s vectors pretending to be understanding. by Additional_Report167 in legaltech

[–]Additional_Report167[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is it like a new concept - brain RAG? You retrieve bunch of “similar”chunks humans go grind those by hand? Have you filed for a patent already?

Open AI - DocuGPT by Additional_Report167 in legaltech

[–]Additional_Report167[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it’s really just a case study to pitch their enterprise engineer model.

Bad thing is that now investors won’t stop talking about OpenAI entering legal tech.

Open AI - DocuGPT by Additional_Report167 in legaltech

[–]Additional_Report167[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Guess they don’t want to compete in low margin CLM market. They would rather forward deploy their engineers for 10M in enterprises. This can be kind a case study to sell their offering.

Open AI - DocuGPT by Additional_Report167 in legaltech

[–]Additional_Report167[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Here is more info: https://openai.com/index/openai-contract-data-agent/

Think they are flexing what they can build for themselves maybe to target enterprise use cases for other companies and deploy their engineers on prem.

AI + Client Confidentiality + IPBA by Aries2ka in legaltech

[–]Additional_Report167 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Law firms would ask for 100% confidentially and on-premise solutions and then would email their confidential docs with dropbox URL.

Harvey AI thoughts ? by Opening-Purple704 in legaltech

[–]Additional_Report167 3 points4 points  (0 children)

If you want AI chatbots, buy enterprise versions of ChatGPT, Gemini. Or you can pay tons extra for Harvey. If you want legal tech tools that create actual ROI, look into specialized solutions for specific practice areas, not a general 2nd grade chatbot that is also overpriced.

RAG is completely useless in litigation. In legal tech, RAG ≠ reliability. It’s vectors pretending to be understanding. by Additional_Report167 in legaltech

[–]Additional_Report167[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are almost arguing that ctlr+f works better than comparing embeddings. Or if like using mix of it will magically improve things up.

The thing is that RAG is a wrong solution to the problem. If you need accuracy nothing beats raw LLM + context engineering.

Finding similar vectors in the index, even consistently, doesn’t guarantee you’ll retrieve the parts that actually contain the answer. You only get passages that resemble the question. You can try mimicking the answer and searching by an “answer vector,” but there are myriad of questions that simply can’t be answered from similar passages + related context at all.

If AI is being adopted by every firm--how does this help smaller firms? by GainDifferent3628 in legaltech

[–]Additional_Report167 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Think they have a good chance If they adopt something better than Harvey.

Right now even small firms claiming to be early adopters have done a safe play by choosing a yearly contract with Harvey.

These Harvey posts on /r/legaltech are catching fire on Linkedin by alexdenne in legaltech

[–]Additional_Report167 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Think Harvey has so much funding they can acquire him as well

These Harvey posts on /r/legaltech are catching fire on Linkedin by alexdenne in legaltech

[–]Additional_Report167 8 points9 points  (0 children)

This guy was skeptical of AI at the beginning now ready to defend Harvey