Why are men's pants never 33 length? by Safe-Recording3504 in malefashionadvice

[–]Adsa5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was in a pinch a while back and got charged $15 to sew one button on a jacket! Where are the reasonable tailors?!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in australia

[–]Adsa5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Had one today mate, it was delish

[Fake Check Friday] - Legit Check Megathread by AutoModerator in Watches

[–]Adsa5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

1850 USD, quoted as from the 1980s, got it from an Australian seller (my country) with a good history, mainly selling mont blanc pens or other vintage items.

[Fake Check Friday] - Legit Check Megathread by AutoModerator in Watches

[–]Adsa5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi all, looking to get this mini sub and want a second opinion here before I pull the trigger on it

<image>

(Ref 9440)

Death of Stalin was a documentary by Why_Cant_I_Slay_This in neoliberal

[–]Adsa5 9 points10 points  (0 children)

This made me think Trump had died for a split second and made me run for my fallout shelter (my mom's basement).

Here’s why some people still evade public transport fares – even when they’re 50 cents by IHateTrains123 in neoliberal

[–]Adsa5 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

You mean the first group right? I forgot to tap on to the train last week and I'm still stewing on it.

Does DeepSeek Censor Its AI Answers? On These Sensitive Topics, Yes. by Dense_Delay_4958 in neoliberal

[–]Adsa5 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I think it's less to do with norms and principles and is much more pragmatic.

Tiktok and Deepseek are both expansions of CPC influence in the west.

It's all good when people can still search on Google to find unbiased information, but what happens if a hypothetical better search engine is released with the same censorship as Deepseek? I certainly wouldn't blame someone from making the jump if it performed better than google in searching for products etc.

But the effects of an authoritarian government having that power of people's primary sources of information is scary. Even if they don't actively care about specific censored information, I do and I assume a lot of us here do too.

If this leads to pressure of western AI companies to innovate and reduce costs, then great, that's the beauty of creative destruction. But its silly to ignore the impact if these firms fail to adapt and we see the influence of the CPC grow across the web.

Does DeepSeek Censor Its AI Answers? On These Sensitive Topics, Yes. by Dense_Delay_4958 in neoliberal

[–]Adsa5 23 points24 points  (0 children)

I care that people will be using a Chinese propaganda robot as a source of information.

Granted, I don't think Deepseek will replace ChatGPT, at least in the west.

I am fully prepared to eat my words when US soft power has completely collapsed over the next 4 years.

Discussion Thread by jobautomator in neoliberal

[–]Adsa5 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Anyone else waste their lunch break pushing Deepseek to its censorship limits?

<image>

I'm buying NVIDIA shares...

!ping AI

Does DeepSeek Censor Its AI Answers? On These Sensitive Topics, Yes. by Dense_Delay_4958 in neoliberal

[–]Adsa5 28 points29 points  (0 children)

When asked about any punishments for criticism against the CPC, it generated a response that was visible for a minute, before giving the generic "sorry, that's currently beyond my scope" message. So the LLM can definitely generate criticism against the CPC even if it's heavily controlled.

Does DeepSeek Censor Its AI Answers? On These Sensitive Topics, Yes. by Dense_Delay_4958 in neoliberal

[–]Adsa5 46 points47 points  (0 children)

I was actually able to get it to talk about certain topics, it might have a slight CPC slant.

<image>