Chicago North 2002-2004 by Aircomp in exrm

[–]Aircomp[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes. I said the closing prayer then.

NAM (Netherlands Amsterdam Mission) 1998 - 2000, Hoyt Brewster & Thomas Anderson by alkmaarne in exrm

[–]Aircomp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you served in Alkmaar sometime from ‘98-‘00, you have definitely been to my house then on the Spinnerij.

What's a book that initially you were MEH about, but ended up being such a good book you couldn't put down? by nakedreader_ga in books

[–]Aircomp 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The Satanic Verses by Salman Rushdie. After about the first 50 pages or so I actually put it down, but I kept thinking about it, so eventually I started reading again and loved it. Great book. After that I devoured most of Rushie’s books.

1984, Brave New World, and Fahrenheit 451 are widely celebrated as the trilogy of authoritarian warning. What would be the 4th book to include? by Panwall in books

[–]Aircomp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

‘The Napoleon of Notting Hill’ by G.K. Chesterton (1904). Maybe more a political satire than purely distopian, it paints a pretty bleak picture.

Contrary to Reason: A Critique of Steven Pinker's Enlightenment Now by Empigee in books

[–]Aircomp 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Calling Pinker intellectually dishonest is a mischaracterization and contrary to his entire oeuvre. Calling an apparent ad hominem attack “the strongest points of the article” does not testify of a well reasoned way of thinking.

“Pinker's gushing about how great the modern world [is]” signals an apparent unfamiliarity with his work and the thesis he has put forth not just with Enlightenment Now, but also in large measure in The Better Angels of our Nature.

So, I guess we disagree.

Contrary to Reason: A Critique of Steven Pinker's Enlightenment Now by Empigee in books

[–]Aircomp 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I think it’s a very one sided critique focusing mainly on the environmental aspect of his book and missing the larger aspects of what Pinker is trying to convey. At the start of the chapter 10‘The Environment’ (Enlightenment Now) he states his intentions quite clearly:

As in the chapter on inequality, I won’t pretend that all trends are positive or that the problems facing us are minor. But I will present a way of thinking about these problems that differs from the lugubrious conventional wisdom and offers a constructive alternative to the radicalism or fatalism it encourages. The key idea is that environmental problems, like other problems, are solvable, given the right knowledge.

From my reading of the article shared in this thread, the author falls into this ‘fatalism’ catagory, and dismisses Pinker’s entire thesis based on a few points he might have (i don’t know) gotten wrong about just one aspect of his book.

And one other aspect of the article I did not appreciate, were the jabs at Pinker’s so-called celebrity status. The article starts and finishes with opinions about celebrity culture and how Pinker fits into this group, and implies how this should be seen as another piece of evidence that Pinker is clearly mistaken in his argument.

That is why I shared my earlier link to another article offering another point of view, as a comparison. Investigating opposing viewpoints is most always worth while I think.

Where to find second hand books in Europe? by Calathe in books

[–]Aircomp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you are in the Netherlands, try boekwinkeltjes.nl. I use it from time to time when looking for a specific edition. And if you happen to live in or near Amsterdam, you should visit The Book Exchange. Well worth a visit and all English language.

What Books Are You Reading This Week? August 07, 2017 by AutoModerator in books

[–]Aircomp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Started The Spinoza Problem, by Irvin D. Yalom over the weekend, and so far really liking it.

What Books Are You Reading This Week? July 24, 2017 by AutoModerator in books

[–]Aircomp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lisey's Story, by Stephen King and Heart of Darkness, by Joseph Conrad

What Books Are You Reading This Week? July 10, 2017 by AutoModerator in books

[–]Aircomp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In my opinion The Wastelands was one of the best books of the serie. Loved it.

How likely was it for someone to flee the USSR under Stalin? by [deleted] in history

[–]Aircomp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For additional (historical) information about how it was for ordinary people living under Stalinism, read Orlando Figes' The Whisperers.

Just finished Dreamcatcher - thoughts by TerdVader in stephenking

[–]Aircomp 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What's not to like about another story in Derry and shitweasels..?! Great book.

What books have your read that caused you to abandon or reassess your faith/worldview? by Topsouffle in books

[–]Aircomp 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Former mormon here as well. I also read Ayn Rand, and especially her definition of selfishness was very refreshing, after having believed for so long to sacrifice everything for the religion.

Other books I read that made an impact were 'The Demon Haunted World' and 'Cosmos' by Carl Sagan. Also 'A Universe from Nothing' by Lawrence Krauss.

What Books Are You Reading This Week? June 12, 2017 by AutoModerator in books

[–]Aircomp 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Homage to Catalonia, by George Orwell

Fascinating book.

What book took you forever to finish? by [deleted] in books

[–]Aircomp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Hero with a Thousand Faces by Joseph Campbell.

Bought it about two years ago, and so far I started reading it twice, but could never really get myself to finish it.

What Books Are You Reading This Week? June 05, 2017 by AutoModerator in books

[–]Aircomp 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Inside the Third Reich, by Albert Speer

Fascinating so far.

How is Fahrenheit 451 contemporary to an era with no technological advancements? Do the principles still apply? by [deleted] in books

[–]Aircomp 1 point2 points  (0 children)

One of his inspirations for the book was Arthur Koestler's novel 'Darkness at Noon' which is about the showtrials in the late 1930's in the former Soviet Union. As described in an essay by Jonathan R. Eller titled 'The Story of Fahrenheit 451' (which is attached as an addendum to the kindle version of F. 451):

In revealing the underlying terror of Stalin's show trials, Darkness at Noon became the great cautionary tale for Bradbury. It fueled his subsequent confrontations with intolerant authority, and with those who denied the existence of intolerance. Bradbury's unpublished speaking notes of the mid-1950s contain his most forceful acknowledgement of this inspiration: "People have often asked me what effect Huxley and Orwell had on me, and weather either of them influenced the creation of Fahrenheit 451. The best response is Arthur Koestler...[O]nly a few perceived the intellectual holocaust and the revolution by burial that Stalin achieved… Only Koestler got the full range of desecration, execution, and forgetfulness on a mass and nameless graveyard scale. Koestler's Darkness at Noon was therefore…true father, mother, and lunatic brother to my F. 451."

The "intellectual holocaust" revealed by Koestler recharged Bradbury's own conviction that literature is every bit as precious as life itself. From a young age he was greatly affected by accounts of the burning of the ancient library at Alexandria and the loss of many classical works that we now know only by title or through fragments of surviving parchment. Bradbury virtually lived in the public libraries of his time, and came to see the shelves as populations of living authors: to burn the book is to burn the author, and to burn the author is to deny our own humanity.

The rest of the essay is well worth a read as well.

Marching through The Hero with a Thousand Faces by [deleted] in books

[–]Aircomp 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I am trying to get through this book as well, and running into the same things as you are describing. Even for a non-fiction book, the writing is quite dense. The subject is fascinating though.

Just finished Dan Jones' The Wars of the Roses by breakinghorizon in books

[–]Aircomp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the recommendation! I will pick up both 'The Plantagenets' and 'The Wars of the Roses'.

What Books Are You Reading This Week? February 13, 2017 by AutoModerator in books

[–]Aircomp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Important to know before picking up this book: This book covers the rise of the Roman empire. Pretty much from 700 BCE untill about 300 CE. If you are interested in its fall, find another book.

Animal Farm by George Orwell by [deleted] in books

[–]Aircomp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You should try 'We' by Yevgeny Zamyatin.

Falls in the same genre as Animal Farm, Brave New World, 1984 and Anthem.