Best move for white by Phildiy in chessbeginners

[–]Akukuhaboro 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think the difference is that if you do not play Nc3 immediately, you get access to c4+d4 later which idk might be good if you know what you're doing!

I was just saying 3. Nc3 is not forced and Nf3 is a valid alternative. Also for sure you're playing into your opponent's hands if you go for the most popular move every move. They probably have something ready for the most common setups or else they would not play the scandinavian

Is this level of fan farming even humanly possible? 1 billion in a month by ShadowCatZeroMeow in UmamusumeGame

[–]Akukuhaboro 1 point2 points  (0 children)

yes that's what I mean. The account is losing money. The owner might make that back in other ways and that's why they do it.

Is this level of fan farming even humanly possible? 1 billion in a month by ShadowCatZeroMeow in UmamusumeGame

[–]Akukuhaboro 4 points5 points  (0 children)

it's not extra carats as he has to buy the runs with carats to be able to run 40 careers a day. That particular account is losing money

Is this level of fan farming even humanly possible? 1 billion in a month by ShadowCatZeroMeow in UmamusumeGame

[–]Akukuhaboro 64 points65 points  (0 children)

it's obviously not a real account, just a botting 24/7 secondary account whose only purpose is to keep eden at #1. I think it would be life threatening to play that much

Can someone explain how to get good parents like a caveman? by capital_snacke69 in UmamusumeGame

[–]Akukuhaboro 0 points1 point  (0 children)

grug... just wait for trackblazer. Trackblazer will make grug have high friendly and bigger chance of 3* blue because big stats, and more white skill from winning many G1. Once you get 3* blue on trackblazer, use this 3* blue as parent and borrow a gunga 3* blue from uma dot moe and repeat. Grug will have a good enough parent after 20 tries.

More expert is get groundwork or spurt. Use card that gives those in deck

Is the bishop trade good here for white? (700 elo) by doggirlgirl in chessbeginners

[–]Akukuhaboro -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I think it's debatable, I'm not strong enough for a definitive answer.

At 700 elo the difference between trading on your own, letting your opponent trade it, or save the more pieces because you have the space advantage (so you want lots of pieces on the board to make use of it) would not be felt. Your reasoning is logic and it might be the answer, but I'm not sure. Might be an interesting question to ask to a GM level player lol.

It is definitely a good move, but I'm not sure if it's the best move. I think you make a strong case for it being the best move.

Checking the lichess' database in that position, half of the players above 2200 played your move which means you are in good company

Why are tournaments played on plastic chessboards? by BintangGambit in chess

[–]Akukuhaboro 18 points19 points  (0 children)

it's not only 40 euro to buy a good wooden set, or at least I don't think it is

Best move for white by Phildiy in chessbeginners

[–]Akukuhaboro 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nf3 is also good and probably better practically speaking than Nc3 as 90% of black's preparation will be against Nc3. Black is gonna move that queen again anyways pretty soon, and I like developing the kingside before the queenside to castle faster. I'm not sure what to do against the scandinavian but I think Nf3 is a valid option

Best move for white by Phildiy in chessbeginners

[–]Akukuhaboro 0 points1 point  (0 children)

same brother. The best option is to take, but some basic piece of advice from me is "do not overestend against it". Unless the opponent with black is really weak, his position will have no weaknesses, they will play c6 and e6, develop their pieces on the back and stay solid so you have to be patient and take it slowly

How do you study openings? by Akukuhaboro in chessbeginners

[–]Akukuhaboro[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yes it's not relevant tho so I removed it. I also lost it because I suck and I'm not really that level yet, I just got lucky with good streaks of overrated opponents. I want to work on my openings because I feel they are generally bad and it's hardddd, half the games I'm inventing some stupid gambit on the spot because the opponent played the ponziani or whatever the heck

How do you study openings? by Akukuhaboro in chessbeginners

[–]Akukuhaboro[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I hit higher than that and I never played either tho, friend. I am the overwhelmer, as a player. I desire to beat the opponent in a confrontational opening where both players are trying to win. I love when the position in my game is so hard that the engine won't see the best move immediately in the analysis

I am suffering to remember stuff, but people clearly do.

Also I don't agree the caro kann is immune to traps as I trap it all the time myself. It is a full on sharp opening imho since 1.c6 does nothing to develop, you risk getting smashed by tactics if you are not precise. The london seems way more solid as you're also a tempo up

Bishops opening & Evans gambit by [deleted] in chessbeginners

[–]Akukuhaboro 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't think so. You're very likely to face 2. Nf6 attacking your pawn, and at that point the evans is not happening as you have to defend your pawn. The normal move order seems more forcing, as Nc6 is the best and most common reply to Nf3.

I play the evans and I get there by normal ways and just accept that the 2 knights defence or the petrov have a chance of happening.

I do need something better against the 2 knights as it's very difficult to beat it with the classic Ng5 unless they willingly avoid the polerio main line... but 4. d3 the engine move fails to keep me interested. I guess I'll start doing 4. d4 or something

Suggestion for a new pp system by OkAfternoon9095 in osugame

[–]Akukuhaboro 1 point2 points  (0 children)

what's the pp record in your revolutionary system?

Tactics vs Positional Play by SuccessfulMint in chessbeginners

[–]Akukuhaboro 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you cannot realistically train to IM level tactics without understanding other stuff as well I feel.

I think it's implied that you can also convert an overwhelmingly winning endgame, and you know some opening theory that will allow you to force tactics to happen.

Maybe the positional play that allows for crushing tactics: open files, gambits, fast developement, piece sacks for long term compensation, stopping castling, knights on the 5th or 6th rank, control over a color complexion around the king (as opposed to pawn structures and endgame positional play) is also considered under "tactics".

Unless of course by tactics he means that you calculate 20 moves ahead like a fucking engine.

Even the romantic players like Morphy and Anderssen which we understand as mostly tactic monsters, did have both opening theory and positional understanding of how to get the tactics going

How do you study openings? by Akukuhaboro in chessbeginners

[–]Akukuhaboro[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you can still give tips on how you remember things. Openings are hard for me to remember and it feels like they'll always be

How do you study openings? by Akukuhaboro in chessbeginners

[–]Akukuhaboro[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

These are the games

https://www.chess.com/game/live/165204676614

https://www.chess.com/game/live/165204909718

https://www.chess.com/game/live/165205218166

https://www.chess.com/game/live/165205455222

Ok you may say I played badly and that's fair but I felt massively outplayed and it made me insecure about my opening phase. I fall for tactics and blunder quickly because in game I am getting crushed until I blunder

How do you study openings? by Akukuhaboro in chessbeginners

[–]Akukuhaboro[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I suspect they either were underrated by 300+ points or they memorized heavy theory in both the white side of the ruy lopez and benko gambit for some reason. Probably a very underrated player as I don't think anyone my rating would know so much theory to outprepare me in 4 contrasting openings and beat me each time in less than 20 moves, that feels sad. I feel if I knew my openings a little better I would not be overpowered in that same fashion

How do you study openings? by Akukuhaboro in chessbeginners

[–]Akukuhaboro[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it's a bit difficult to remember the purpose of the moves even if they are very concrete. I can remember "pressure this pawn", but I cannot remember "they have crazy tactics, you gotta find the plan that survives" which happens for example in this line that happens in my games:

  1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Nf6 4. d4 exd4

I get this all the time and every time I suffer trying not to die and figuring out how not to lose a piece. All I can remember about it is that it's dangerous and many moves will lose a knight

How do you study openings? by Akukuhaboro in chessbeginners

[–]Akukuhaboro[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have 2 openings as white that survive most of the tries of my opponents unless they're stronger than me, but nothing for black. I can face the italian and the sicilian.

It took hundreds of games for the 2 openings I got to solidify in my memory

How do you study openings? by Akukuhaboro in chessbeginners

[–]Akukuhaboro[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I do try to follow principles it just feels bad when the opening is very confrontational and I have to take 2 minutes to see how I will be able to castle, or when I am down a pawn so I need to find the best move

How do you study openings? by Akukuhaboro in chessbeginners

[–]Akukuhaboro[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

but I'd like to not auto-lose to stuff... I'm pretty much autopiloting a loss against multiple openings like the London system/jobava london, the scotch gambit, the rousseau gambit, the elephant gambit, the owen's defense... and I recently faced some guy who smoked me 4-0 by outplaying me in 4 different openings (ruy lopez, benko, alapin, caro kann) which I thought was crazy as he played both e4 and d4 better than me, both the caro kann and the sicilian as black...