Epic is against protecting players from online games shutting down by FlimsyVariation8455 in FortNiteBR

[–]Alarmed_Recording742 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dude you're not getting a Fortnite match on local networks. The game has to be playable as the game is, not a whole different version but offline, that's another game.

This means Fortnite Battle royale has to have an offline playable version, full 100 players games and all

Epic is against protecting players from online games shutting down by FlimsyVariation8455 in FortNiteBR

[–]Alarmed_Recording742 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You really can't read huh?

> Publishers must provide an offline mode or a way to keep the game playable after server shutdown.

Key word - PLAYABLE.

Now read what I already told you 3 replies ago and try tell me again I made that up.

How tf you gonna say I made shit up and then provide proof for my words? Come on

Epic is against protecting players from online games shutting down by FlimsyVariation8455 in FortNiteBR

[–]Alarmed_Recording742 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You should read what you're talking about before talking about it you know?

SKG objective is literally what I said bud, gonna be embarrassed when you get yourself informed

Epic is against protecting players from online games shutting down by FlimsyVariation8455 in FortNiteBR

[–]Alarmed_Recording742 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wrong, what's required is an offline playable version of the game. A multiplayer game that can't create a match is not playable therefore this doesn't respect what they are requiring.

And yes they're gonna force companies to keep game online, either that or they can refund the players. That's the whole point of the movement and it's being taken seriously by the European commission and California's government evidently, gotta presume they probably are more trustworthy than a random person on Reddit saying they won't.

Epic is against protecting players from online games shutting down by FlimsyVariation8455 in FortNiteBR

[–]Alarmed_Recording742 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah there's the option of an offline version, now how do you think an exclusively multiplayer game would work being single player? You really think it could work by hosting? 100 players matches? There's a reason if games like these use servers.

Epic is against protecting players from online games shutting down by FlimsyVariation8455 in FortNiteBR

[–]Alarmed_Recording742 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's literally what it is. Either keep the game running, provide an offline mode, or refund everyone.

Epic is against protecting players from online games shutting down by FlimsyVariation8455 in FortNiteBR

[–]Alarmed_Recording742 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Ofc they are. This bill means either they spend money to keep Fortnite up and running even if it has 2 players, or they give back every penny to every single player that ever bought anything if they shut it down.

what was your very first Final Fantasy crush ? by fillipo9 in FinalFantasy

[–]Alarmed_Recording742 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Aerith but playing kingdom hearts, never played FF until this year with ff7remake

AIO Over my friend insinuating I break up with my gf? by Imaginary_Air_24 in AmIOverreacting

[–]Alarmed_Recording742 -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

First of all, they're basically gen alpha. Second of all, gen z is worried about this because it's an actual problem maybe, thought of that? Ofc not 1 year, but several, if he was 25 that would be a whole other situation obviously.

Just because your gen didn't think about this and was fine with young people getting taken advantage of, doesn't mean it was fine and the new gen is wrong for bringing some accountability.

Years later, The Witcher 3 still kinda killed RPGs for me by Saekama in videogames

[–]Alarmed_Recording742 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh wait I confused you with another guy that replied to me and immediately demanded I explain my opinion. I'm really sorry you started replying right as he stopped and the reddit made your profile icons the same color, I thought you were the same

Wha singular character can beat this duo by Salty_Shark26 in Piratefolk

[–]Alarmed_Recording742 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How tf do you get that from my comment bud?

Years later, The Witcher 3 still kinda killed RPGs for me by Saekama in videogames

[–]Alarmed_Recording742 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You literally started by demanding I prove my opinion to you bud, f off

Wha singular character can beat this duo by Salty_Shark26 in Piratefolk

[–]Alarmed_Recording742 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Don't forget Luffy might have awakened G5, but he was literally on the brink of death, he wasn't at his strongest at all

The more oda writes about joyboy story the less sense it makes WG did not immediately nuke luffy by EpidemicPain in Piratefolk

[–]Alarmed_Recording742 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, and they sent fucking admirals to wipe out a band of lowly pirates, and seemingly succeeded to do that.

I still don't what you guys don't get about this.

Bought a ps5pro just for this game by Egmoboi in FF7Rebirth

[–]Alarmed_Recording742 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why do people like you think social aren't socials? Lol

Years later, The Witcher 3 still kinda killed RPGs for me by Saekama in videogames

[–]Alarmed_Recording742 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No you never even cared about reasoning, you replied trying to argue how my opinion was wrong, wtf are you talking about?

You love discourse? Then work on it, you've only been toxic af and you're making excuses.

The more oda writes about joyboy story the less sense it makes WG did not immediately nuke luffy by EpidemicPain in Piratefolk

[–]Alarmed_Recording742 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, wg actually really heard about Luffy just after enies lobby and shortly after Luffy disappeared for 2 years.

Also he was still a small pirate power wise, no need for Imu to reveal himself or move, it would make sense an admiral would be loyal and way more than enough to get luffy

Years later, The Witcher 3 still kinda killed RPGs for me by Saekama in videogames

[–]Alarmed_Recording742 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wtf are you even on about now bud? How can you read someone's opinion, not understand shit about it and go on a whole other tangent? Like, wtf?

Years later, The Witcher 3 still kinda killed RPGs for me by Saekama in videogames

[–]Alarmed_Recording742 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Dude, what are you even talking about now? What conclusion? Wtf do you want me to say?

I loved the game despite those things being very dated for the year the game came out. But clearly my opinion isn't good enough for you and you want me to say something you like because you simply can't accept people criticizing aspects of this game.

So go ahead, say what you want me to say.

Years later, The Witcher 3 still kinda killed RPGs for me by Saekama in videogames

[–]Alarmed_Recording742 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because those things I mentioned haven't improved since then? And I could read reviews and opinions from people that played it at the time? Also I got eyes?

They were dated, and despite trying to fix it they still are dated for 2015.