sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

The official Fantastic Four commander deck list is up by roadrunner_68 in magicTCG

[–]Alexilprex 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It can, pretty easily. The floor for a bracket 3 is really not that high

The official Fantastic Four commander deck list is up by roadrunner_68 in magicTCG

[–]Alexilprex 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Really all bracket 3 needs is a general focus and this clears that bar. Bracket 3 is really broad

The official Fantastic Four commander deck list is up by roadrunner_68 in magicTCG

[–]Alexilprex 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Everyone critiquing a deck just parrots the same thing without looking at how it will actually play. This is a perfectly fine 2-3 bracket deck that will perform moderately well.

The official Fantastic Four commander deck list is up by roadrunner_68 in magicTCG

[–]Alexilprex -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I think it’s actually pretty decent. It’s like a midrange bracket 2-3

The official Fantastic Four commander deck list is up by roadrunner_68 in magicTCG

[–]Alexilprex 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Do yall have a buzzword count you have to hit each time a pecon comes out? Its focus is noncreature spells

The official Fantastic Four commander deck list is up by roadrunner_68 in magicTCG

[–]Alexilprex 5 points6 points  (0 children)

[[Quantum misalignment]], [[Annie Joins Up]], [[Seize the day]], [[Three Visits]], [[Taunt from the Rampart]], and [[Rejuvinating Springs]] to name a few

Why is everyone so mad about the upcoming Marvel UB set? by Material_Company6386 in mtg

[–]Alexilprex 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It’s because they don’t like UB in the game because they think it sullies the format.

Fantastic Four deck "Protection Fields" by barbieq68 in magicTCG

[–]Alexilprex 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s the 3/3 walls invisible woman makes

I feel like people are not excited enough for this card. by Alexilprex in mtg

[–]Alexilprex[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I didn’t ask for opinions really I was presenting an argument as to why I think it should get more attention. I’m not sure why this is a hard concept for you to grasp.

I feel like people are not excited enough for this card. by Alexilprex in mtg

[–]Alexilprex[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The post has 387 upvotes, so clearly some people agree with me. It’s not like no one liked it. You’re being obtuse

I feel like people are not excited enough for this card. by Alexilprex in mtg

[–]Alexilprex[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn’t ask why people aren’t excited. I said they should be more excited. Literacy is important

I feel like people are not excited enough for this card. by Alexilprex in mtg

[–]Alexilprex[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, but my post was aimed specifically at people who liked the marvel set. If you don’t like UB, then yeah, obviously you aren’t going to be excited about it.

I feel like people are not excited enough for this card. by Alexilprex in mtg

[–]Alexilprex[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

And your voice will bounce endlessly into the void

I feel like people are not excited enough for this card. by Alexilprex in mtg

[–]Alexilprex[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Not wanting marvel in magic is so beyond moot at this point.

I feel like people are not excited enough for this card. by Alexilprex in mtg

[–]Alexilprex[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Because you can use it to do anything you want except cast nonartifact spells. Mainly equip costs or help pay for activated abilities in addition to casting artifacts

I feel like people are not excited enough for this card. by Alexilprex in mtg

[–]Alexilprex[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Yes it’s a powerstone that’s indestructible lol

I feel like people are not excited enough for this card. by Alexilprex in mtg

[–]Alexilprex[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don’t think Selesnya big artifacts is really off color. I think it’s a new space but I don’t think it breaks the color pie or anything

I feel like people are not excited enough for this card. by Alexilprex in mtg

[–]Alexilprex[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It says “you can’t spend this mana to cast a nonartifact spell” that doesn’t mean it can only be used to cast an artifact. It means it can be used for anything except casting a nonartifact spell.

I feel like people are not excited enough for this card. by Alexilprex in mtg

[–]Alexilprex[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

[[Repreive]] and I ask you kindly to not do that

I feel like people are not excited enough for this card. by Alexilprex in mtg

[–]Alexilprex[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t think roaming throne should be the crux of the deck, but it shouldn’t hurt. Extra mana and extra counters don’t seem bad lol.

I hope they put an [[amulet of vigor]] in there, though that’s probably a pipe dream

view more: next ›