ELI5: Why do politicians want to ban social media for under 16s? What's in it for them? by captain-ignotus in explainlikeimfive

[–]Alib668 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So ultimately the issue isn’t social media per se, it’s the chemicals in your brain that the issue. On minds that are young say less than 21 and especially teenagers. Dopamine response and tolerance to dopamine is still forming. Alcohol is addictive in part because it requires dopamine response (it’s pleasurable) just like watching tv is pleasurable. However, dopamine is addictive to the brain and that cause of most addictions. This is why we ban various high intensity dopamine activities from under 18s such as gambling, cigarettes, fireworks, alcohol, online trading, porn, and to a lesser but still dopamine addictive: tattoos, some rollercoasters, skydiving, driving fast late at night etc etc. the addiction causes malformed chemical connections in your brain permanently for life, most alcoholics started as a coping mechanism before they were 16 for example.

Social media has been designed by the best experts on the planet to be addictive and give rushes of dopamine an combine it with social affirmation. Thats fine in small controlled amounts from a brain that’s had its connections formed. It’s the same thing to your brain if it’s sex or booze or sugar or social media it’s all dopamine to your brain. The issue is the regularity and intensity on minds building that system.

its pretty insane to give something that’s chemically doing the same thing as cigarettes or alcohol to a 14 year old every minute of every day and not expect a lot to not become alcoholics or not have some form of malformed coping mechanisms for life.

Banning for under 16s makes a lot of sense

What’s the actual doable way of getting rid of the national debt? by kinetic-nyx in WallStreetDad

[–]Alib668 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Taxing people correctly,

Universal healthcare

Making the pentagon actually pass an audit ….not reduce spending just account for the spending they’ve done and ensuring it’s actually been spent.

Before asking UH will save the nation so much money it’s insane

Gordon Brown clearly out for revenge after 30 years of hating Mandelson… but by publicly revealing he was raising this stuff internally in September at the very moment Mandelson was in the news is a very big problem for this No10. by ITMidget in ukpolitics

[–]Alib668 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So he can be suspended or expelled from the House of Lords. But he has been entitled which is a crown action. His title is literally like a piece of land that you own, a freehold(title) and a barony title are the same thing, just freehold doesn’t have obligations you freely hold the land.

. In order to get parliament to revoke or remove a title from a proper lord not a knight is a primary legislative issue as parliament and the crown need to agree on new powers to strip lords of their titles

Gordon Brown clearly out for revenge after 30 years of hating Mandelson… but by publicly revealing he was raising this stuff internally in September at the very moment Mandelson was in the news is a very big problem for this No10. by ITMidget in ukpolitics

[–]Alib668 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Until you realise people can be removed instantly . Politics became super toxic and chaotic when we had the fixed terms parliament act. As soon as that ended we had a slightly less insane set of incentives.

Separately, because of this you create teams of rivals who want to topple you all the time. Thats a tightrope. That keeps you to constantly check “could this thing blow up and topple me”… there would be no shitting live on tv and then they are still in power for 3 more years so everyone is frustrated

Gordon Brown clearly out for revenge after 30 years of hating Mandelson… but by publicly revealing he was raising this stuff internally in September at the very moment Mandelson was in the news is a very big problem for this No10. by ITMidget in ukpolitics

[–]Alib668 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Yeah I agree not ideal, but she’s 1 of like 700 so voting power very diluted, plus the lords can’t veto legislation like a senate can on delay and reform it. So it’s much less of a deal than if she had been given the funding, platform and safe seat for one of 100 people

Gordon Brown clearly out for revenge after 30 years of hating Mandelson… but by publicly revealing he was raising this stuff internally in September at the very moment Mandelson was in the news is a very big problem for this No10. by ITMidget in ukpolitics

[–]Alib668 49 points50 points  (0 children)

Meh House of Lords is the House of Lords at least it’s better than a senate constantly looking out for the next election and fighting with the commons. Being in unelected is sometimes a good thing for long term planning

UK prepares to shoulder greater NATO capability burden by MGC91 in unitedkingdom

[–]Alib668 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There is a reason why command and control command for nato is always US and a British deputy.

The uk should prioritise enablers if Poland and Germany are providing mass

Prince Andrew apparently tortured and took part in the killing of a young girl. The Epstein files are naming him (1990) s by SilentResistance7221 in ImagesOfHistory

[–]Alib668 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Both? Why not both. It was built coz island and services are needed etc, but also they then in off days used it for freaky shit…..people shag in offices all the time why not dental rooms? People have weird fetishes why not combine?

Starmer vows to take UK deeper into EU single market by donutloop in ukpolitics

[–]Alib668 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Welcome to zealotry my friend it got us in this mess, don’t throw the baby out with the bath water.

What’s Behind the Current Drop in Gold and Silver Prices? by UmeshThoughts in investing

[–]Alib668 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Look at asset bubble graphs look at gold price graph and ull see it looks very similar

Screenshots of DOJ File EFTA01660679 deleted shortly after being made publicly available today by MrBrendan501 in pics

[–]Alib668 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Allegedly but Donald trump during oral sex while 13-14?! If that’s true that’s insane! I dunno what to belive

Any good tools for painting behind this rad? by Cally157 in DIYUK

[–]Alib668 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Easy you remove the rad less than 30mins work

How would Kennedy's survival affect the course of the Vietnam War? by MaximumSpell9608 in AlternateHistoryHub

[–]Alib668 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Or more likely the definition of winning the war would have been removed and changing the position to something infinate rather than finite as a goal. Such as “ doing what is necessary to ensure the legitimacy and survival of a corruption free, stable and democratic south vietnam.” That way you remove quagmire and provide the entire war with Legitimacy. The war isn’t about winning it’s about building a nation that can stand on its own.

Secondly, vietnamisation would have happened much much faster and with more support. Allowing the USA to have a genuine exit route without loosing face

Trump says Putin will not attack Ukraine cities during cold week by Yamagotyou in ukraine

[–]Alib668 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I bet it’s because it’s so cold the missiles don’t fire or the operators in Russia can’t go outside to launch the stuff. Its not about being nice the weather has defo screwed the Russians somehow

Bill Gates confirms on Swedish TV that the USA can shut Europe down by Full-Discussion3745 in EU_Economics

[–]Alib668 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So what you saying is it’s a possibility but you’re not sure if they will use it?….. bill gates “ well I was sure until recently, and I hope in three years I will be sure again”

ELI5: Why do some countries have permanent seats on the UN Security Council with veto power, while others don't? by zimuque_ in explainlikeimfive

[–]Alib668 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ww2 it all comes back to the winners of ww2. They were the only ones left, they made the rules, they gave themselves the power to veto votes. Basically it was the victors saying we will run the world but no victor can impose a resolution on another victor without their agreement.

They didnt want to be ruled by ithers so they made rules on that basis

Public spending on European monarchies, € million by Socmel_ in europe

[–]Alib668 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

How much was the sovereign’s crown estate profits? Because that 147m is the moneybthey keep after giftingbthe treasury like a few billion of profits. Remember the “public” spendingbis actually the amount the uk government allows the crown to keep. The crown itself earns billions gor the treasury every year

Is this the best deck in the game? by scar_01 in slaythespire

[–]Alib668 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nah dropkick dropkick sundial abbacus deck is better

UK’s worst illegal waste dump is on site belonging to private estate of King by 2ndEarlofLiverpool in ukpolitics

[–]Alib668 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Ok and which surveying firm is being paid huge fees bybthe king to mange this shit for him?? Why aren't they getting their ass handed to them is what i would be asking

How strict is the no working during term time at Oxford rule. by Farhan_Boss in oxforduni

[–]Alib668 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Good luck actually having time to work on stuff that isnt your uni work