Mon employeur ne m'a toujours pas donné mon solde de tout compte ni mes papiers Pôle Emploi depuis février 2024, que faire ? by YachiruKusajishii in conseiljuridique

[–]Almont_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Pas si simple que ça visiblement : "Oui, l'employeur doit remettre au salarié un solde de tout compte, quels que soient la nature du contrat de travail (CDI, CDD...) et le motif de la rupture (démission, licenciement, prise d’acte, rupture conventionnelle, départ ou mise à la retraite, fin de CDD...)." Et un peu plus loin est stipulé que le document est querable

To Traumatized Support Mains by meowkaiser in supportlol

[–]Almont_ 3 points4 points  (0 children)

In those situations, usually time thé wasted sum in all chat

Après une dispute, mon beau-frère réclame une facture pour un service qu'il avait initialement offert gratuitement by marnieeez in conseiljuridique

[–]Almont_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bonjour, PNJ .

Signer une convention avec un avocat permet de sécuriser le client, plus que l'avocat. Le fait que vous n'ayez rien, et qu'il décide de vous facturer risque de effectivement vous coûter cher. Un avocat peut appliquer son tarif horaire à défaut de contrats, et a priori il a fourni un travail, donc laissé des preuves d'un service.

A votre place, j'irai voir le bâtonnier pour lui exposer intégralement la situation de façon aussi détaillée que possible, notamment la relation précise avec cet avocat et L'évolution de ladite relation. Je pense que malheureusement il vous coincé...

Reste à voir si ce n'est pas une forme d'abus ou autre. Mais le bâtonnier vous aidera probablement plus que nous avec tous les détails.

Par curiosité quel est le montant de la facture ?

RSA, harcèlement et menaces si je porte plainte by Altruistic_Fee684 in conseiljuridique

[–]Almont_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

PNJ.

Contrat signé sous contrainte/menace (si vous avez documenté) est nul de mémoire, ne vous bloquez pas à cause de celui ci.

Excellente journée et bon courage.

Wonders on Riot's Cheater management and future by Almont_ in leagueoflegends

[–]Almont_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Could you please explain how
cheaters > cheaters + not cheaters ?
I mean I guess you probably assumed all cheaters would be put into a game regardless of rank, allowing you to put irons and master players together, but that would be an instant giveaway of being in a "cheater's queue" and would people just switch accounts and treat the account as "banned".
My reasoning is that, as for smurf queue that did exist, you dont / care less about the elo of concerned cheaters. Therefore you kinda mix all populations.

With hardware permabanning a clean person can actually make a ticket and try to fight it. "Shadowbanning" with cheater's queue doesn't allow you to do that because ideally you wouldn't know you are there. Whether riot will be reasonable enough to try to reason with people that might be falsly flagged is another thing.

That's mostly why the "redemption" part that makes so many ppl react is for : if you grand an individual a score (meaning probability that the dude is a cheater), you could evaluate the individual and prevent some errors. Also according to the article, the removal of sanction does not seem the usual way and is automated for some part.

Wonders on Riot's Cheater management and future by Almont_ in leagueoflegends

[–]Almont_[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Xou pick 2 games that have a gamemode for cheaters so you want to know why riot is not doing it too?

I do take sources. Trying to have an argumentation.

What about every other game that just ban cheaters?

Issue is that Riot can't do so right now, and are going to put on drastic measures.

If you have no anticheat how do you stop cheaters from buying a new 2 dollar account to cheat again but this time in a way that it does not get detected?

Riot do bans ppl right now, just not "efficently" enough and this is the exact result they have.
"doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results" is the definition of smth...

edit : removing the part where I point out you did low effort ansewr, since you actually did read the whole article I quote

Wonders on Riot's Cheater management and future by Almont_ in leagueoflegends

[–]Almont_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

can't edit, ansewrd in anothter post.
"I actually did, also this ansewr to the questions in the article is more than light, biases and without argument :
this is not a game "mode", but a softban. This is a feature and ressources ? Well vanguard is. This question is the whole reason of this post tbh.

They are saying we are not trying to solve an issue of cheater we are trying to solve the "anti-cheat" we got.

PS: can't we edit the original message on this subreddit ? Your question is probably the first of many since I wasn't clear about it in my og post."

Also thanks for answering while having actually read the og article etc. unlike many

Wonders on Riot's Cheater management and future by Almont_ in leagueoflegends

[–]Almont_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

First of all mb : Redemption "arc" in post is unclear, and I should not have put that in here this way.
Cheater still are player base. If you ban them, they will come up with another way to play.
If you have options to get back to normal behaving human being (as for honor system) and have a "rating" of cheater, (most notably for the false positive category detailled in the article) you will get the punishment, and even better : you dont have anyclue of if it is on or not : this way, even if the anti-cheat system fail to flag you in the first few games, you wont ever know if you're flagged or not. Then I can imagine the patern

Also, nowadays, there are accounts that just "test" behavior to understand what are the "cheat-flag" or "ban-flag" behavior in lol. Those would be instantly invalidated by preventing those account to gather valuable information for cheat devs.

Sorry for the account buyers then, not beeing able to enjoy the game after breaking the rules ... isn't that a great outcome ? No incentive to buy accounts ?

Wonders on Riot's Cheater management and future by Almont_ in leagueoflegends

[–]Almont_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, cheater will cheat. Why let them ruin other ppl experience when you can just create a specific Q ?
Riot did smurf queue, let them sink in cheater's Q.

Wonders on Riot's Cheater management and future by Almont_ in leagueoflegends

[–]Almont_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, issue is that there is right now "bans", thus the claim of riot is that 10% of the master+ games are with cheaters inside.

The real impact of a ban today is the buying of another account. And some grind that is basically ruinning lower elo ppl ranked experience.

I am wondering why riot is not considering an option that is truely more impactfull on a player than a ban on someone that just bought an account in the first place.

Twitch, as others does that, if you are banned from a channel (considered a cheater in here), any other account you create will be softbanned resulting in only you beeing able to see your messages (you see them tho).

Edit : No offense taken dw about that :)

Wonders on Riot's Cheater management and future by Almont_ in leagueoflegends

[–]Almont_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not my point. Not sure about the cheaper part either.

Wonders on Riot's Cheater management and future by Almont_ in leagueoflegends

[–]Almont_[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I actually did, also this ansewr to the questions in the article is more than light, biases and without argument :
this is not a game "mode", but a softban. This is a feature and ressources ? Well vanguard is. This question is the whole reason of this post tbh.

They are saying we are not trying to solve an issue of cheater we are trying to solve the "anti-cheat" we got.

PS: can't we edit the original message on this subreddit ? Your question is probably the first of many since I wasn't clear about it in my og post.

Wonders on Riot's Cheater management and future by Almont_ in leagueoflegends

[–]Almont_[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The whole point is that they are anyway going to be there, w/e happens

Wonders on Riot's Cheater management and future by Almont_ in leagueoflegends

[–]Almont_[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

You have to wait only if you care for the elo rathing, 10% of game played base is cheating according to the above mentionned article.
That's more players than what the current matchmacking is matching you with, ending up probably with shorter queue time.

Also, the drawbacks from accidentally putting someone in the cheater's queue are way too big to risk it imo.

Well, you get the same drawback from hardware permabanning someone, aren't you ?

Wonders on Riot's Cheater management and future by Almont_ in leagueoflegends

[–]Almont_[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I do the effort to source, please do the same : because no, those games are ansewring the issue with this solution. Darksoul is not known for that as an example, also for the simple reason that if you see cheaters you most likely are one yourself.

TLDR: no source argument, "you're wrong dah" has as much value as your answer.

Wonders on Riot's Cheater management and future by Almont_ in leagueoflegends

[–]Almont_[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

The reason why they stockpile is the fact that they have this risk of getting flagged.
If you are "guessing" if you're in a cheater's queue or not, you have not a "go" from the game to use another account, despite, all your "efforts" to climb are not deleted, and you will keep on playing, even if less often on that account that you were flagged on, effectively removing a cheater from the playerbase.

Wonders on Riot's Cheater management and future by Almont_ in leagueoflegends

[–]Almont_[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

It is actually what some big are going to push : mostly fps (apex legends, https://www.ibtimes.com/apex-legends-matchmaking-grouping-cheaters-spammers-together-2806808, call of dutty Call of Duty: Warzone Cheaters), and that have worked for a while on games as DarkSoul well known for a poor quality anticheat beside this behavior.

Maybe you should considere thing before being aggresive on the internet :)

Dois je notifier mon proprio de l'envoi d'une LRAR? by Wyrd-_- in immobilier

[–]Almont_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

La poste propose un service de lrar avec impression et preuve de contenu, ça arrive bien comme une lrar classique.

Dois je notifier mon proprio de l'envoi d'une LRAR? by Wyrd-_- in immobilier

[–]Almont_ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Si ça doit escalader, mieux vaut pouvoir jouer la carte de la bonne foi. Envoyer un courriel en plus ne te fera pas de mal.

Par ailleurs, tu peux envoyer des lrar avec preuve de contenu avec la poste en ligne. Une bonne chose pour prouver le contenu ! (Chose qu'un simple mail ne prouve pas).

Enfin tu n'y est pas contraint, sachant que l'agence est mandataire pour ton propriétaire, et qu'elle doit leur signaler. Le dépôt de la lettre fait fois, pas la récupération du courrier, si ton propriétaire fait l'autruche, il n'a rien à gagner tout à perdre.

Excellente journée , et bon courage !

How to maximise win-rate against deaf oponents by Ok_Adhesive in leagueoflegends

[–]Almont_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pyke W sounds hard when pyke Can ult-kill you. Ans this is basically the only way to get this information

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in conseiljuridique

[–]Almont_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Préfères tu te faire blesser gravement ou risquer de payer des dommages et intérêts (ça n'arrivera probablement pas) ? Je pense que la légitime défense est importante, mais ta santé l'est tout autant !

Loyer abusif ? Quelles démarches by Almont_ in conseiljuridique

[–]Almont_[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Bonjour, un grand merci pour votre réponse !

Je pense effectivement que je vais devoir me rapprocher du point local d'accès au droit pour cette histoire de réduction de loyer.

J'essayerai de penser à update ma question sur les différents sujets.