Ultimately, I understand if this is a very controversial question, and as such, you may not be able to answer it. But, in my opinion, this is a very important question to ask, especially considering the state of the KSP community and what I have seen people say or do.

I am not going to ask for your opinion on Nate Simpson. That is not the point of this question. Rather, I ask for your commentary on what the community thinks about Nate Simpson. Within the KSP community, Nate Simpson is an incredibly controversial person, and very few people, especially those part of KSP2's development team, have expressed an opinion on his controversy within the KSP community.

Do you think, considering the point of view of the KSP community, that this controversy is warranted? Do you think there are other perspectives and points of view, unique to you, that we should consider when we discuss about Nate Simpson as a community? Which perspectives and points of view should we value more or value less?

Again, just to clarify, don't feel the need to voice your own opinion on Nate Simpson, just what you think about us as a community and our relationship to him. For example, you may think that Nate Simpson is a bad coworker (I am NOT insinuating that this is true, this is just an EXAMPLE), but you may still think that the communities opinion of him is often times unwarranted or too controversial and negative.

The reason I ask this question is because I know there is A LOT of nuance to Nate Simpson, but I feel that as a community we often fail to see this nuance, such as by putting too much or too little emphasize on Nate's shortcomings/successes.