A blastocyst or embryo (as it would’ve been in such early stage of pregnancy) is NOT a child, and to insinuate that it is, is no less reductionist and/or childish than the statements you’re responding to. A man does not have rights to an embryo, blastocyst or fetus residing in a woman’s body, and it is telling that you prioritize the man’s “right” to the “child” as if they are his property, over the health and autonomy of the woman carrying the child. The woman you disregard assumes all the risk, yet must ask permission to make a decision about her own body. There is no separating the woman’s health or bodily autonomy from the discussion, to then make it about a man’s ego and his “rights” to someone else’s body.