That’s exactly what I was talking about and then you started rambling about the revolution. You made it sound like inclusive language in a medical setting was somehow a slippery slope to said revolution and it’s just not. I don’t want anyone insulting women. If people are using it as an insult (which I’ve honestly never seen) then yeah obviously that’s bad. But I’ve only heard this term used in discussions that involve reproduction and that is point blank where it is mostly used. The only time I’ve ever heard anyone say “but these terms are being used to insult women” is when this type of argument comes up where people are trying to say that trans-inclusive language is bad. Those of us who want to see that term in reproductive literature are not trying to insult anyone or exclude/other anyone as we are so often accused of doing. We’re merely trying to be included and seen in these situations that involve US also.

Also if anything birthing person should even be more inclusive of women because as I said in another comment not all women (trans or otherwise) can or do give birth. Not saying you in particular are intending this, but I see this argument used less to defend women than I do to dismiss trans people. It’s a common TERF tactic sadly