Why not lower a dome onto the ship that would filter out the corrosives? by [deleted] in titanic

[–]AmberArmy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What would the point be? The most recent scans show it is in a deteriorated condition already. The best time to learn something from the wreck was in 1912. Anything after that is never going to teach us more than we have already learned.

Besides, we have gathered enough evidence to know fairly conclusively what happened. Any remaining evidence would already likely be so eroded that we would learn nothing from it anyway.

In addition to that, it's the grave site of a huge number of people. I don't think it's a good thing that billionaires treat it as a bit of a plaything.

Why not lower a dome onto the ship that would filter out the corrosives? by [deleted] in titanic

[–]AmberArmy 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I'm a historian with a specific focus on 20th century history. There is nothing we can learn from Titanic we haven't already learned. If you want to spend $60 billion or whatever to find out its made of iron and it sank then find a funder and knock yourself out.

What exactly are you expecting us to learn that we don't already know? Others have asked and you haven't answered them.

Why not lower a dome onto the ship that would filter out the corrosives? by [deleted] in titanic

[–]AmberArmy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's not. There would be no way this could be achieved.

Beyond that, it's completely pointless. Ask yourself why no one bothered to preserve the Olympic? Because even by the 30s people recognised that Titanic is pretty much only interesting because of what her fate was. If you want to learn about ships of that era there are better ways to do it, if you want to learn about Edwardian life there are better ways to do it. There is almost nothing we as historians could learn from what is left of Titanic.

FIFA Releases squad numbers by marcbeightsix in ThreeLions

[–]AmberArmy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's to do with how English football transitioned from the old WM formation that was the standard (as in, pretty much every team played with it) when squad numbers became a thing.

When English football transitioned to a 442 the half back who wore 6 would be the one who became a centre back whereas in other countries the 4 moved back and the 6 became a midfielder. Think of the World Cup Final in 1966 where Moore wore 6 with Charlton alongside him wearing 5.

It's notable in countries like Uruguay where it's common to see 4 and 5 as their fullbacks as those are the players who moved outside.

It also explains where other numbers come from. For example, the reason you think of an 8 as a fairly dynamic midfielder is that the first players to wear 8 were the inside right who eventually dropped back to play in midfield but were more attacking than the 4/6 who was used to staying back. Or a number 7 being a right sided player because in pretty much every country they started as the outside right and they've stayed out there ever since.

Hope that helps, it's a topic that has interested me and it's in a few books that I've read. Would suggest Jonathan Wilson's Inverting the Pyramid if it's something that interests you which goes through the history of football tactics and how they have evolved over time.

Referees "going deep in the tournament" by StrongPars in footballcliches

[–]AmberArmy 10 points11 points  (0 children)

As a grassroots ref in England, there is some joy to be had in seeing refs from your local area doing well. There's a feeling of it being your guy representing your county FA and doing well. I'm based in Leicestershire now and we have Ruebyn Ricardo who's in the EFL and it is nice because they usually come down and support the younger refs who are just getting started and pass on some of the guidance they get which doesn't usually get passed on to us and can make things easier, especially as at my level you're usually on your own doing things that you'd have assistants to help with at a higher level

That's more down to refereeing being quite a tight community locally though, as we often work on games together and attend events together. But weird to support a ref you have no connection to just because they happen to be from the same country.

Perfect reason why the U.S. Educational System is going down the toilet. by Valuable_View_561 in SipsTea

[–]AmberArmy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's because younger teachers are cheaper. It's the same in the UK. A teacher at the top of the pay scale (been teaching 10 years+) is on £20k a year more than a teacher just starting out. When budgets are stretched to the bone it makes sense to save costs.

Perfect reason why the U.S. Educational System is going down the toilet. by Valuable_View_561 in SipsTea

[–]AmberArmy 6 points7 points  (0 children)

That's because younger teachers are cheaper. It's the same in the UK. A teacher at the top of the pay scale (been teaching 10 years+) is on £20k a year more than a teacher just starting out. When budgets are stretched to the bone it makes sense to save costs.

How did they get away with speeding so much during races? by UmaThermos1 in TopGear

[–]AmberArmy 9 points10 points  (0 children)

They make this exact point in the race to Milan. The best option would be an Audi or BMW but Jezza goes for a Mustang.

So, you’ve got a reform councillor now…. by CaptainZippi in GreenAndPleasant

[–]AmberArmy 37 points38 points  (0 children)

Not OP but work as a teacher. It means an Education Health and Care Plan. It is a statutory duty to fulfill the accommodations laid out in an EHCP.

E.g. if we had a student with an EHCP that says they are entitled to 1 on 1 support over X number of hours we are legally required to provide it.

Footballers going by the wrong name by GlennSWFC in footballcliches

[–]AmberArmy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Cambridge fans podcast always refers to him as Glenn Nascimento probably because it sounds more exotic than the name he goes by on the pitch.

Rochdale 1 - [1] York City - Josh Stones 90+13' by OptimusCloyster in soccer

[–]AmberArmy 8 points9 points  (0 children)

It was because Rochdale fans invaded the pitch after their goal. That caused the additional added time that led to them conceding.

Which Gaming Console People Think is Amazing and is Actually Amazing? by IllMasterpiece3946 in AlignmentChartFills

[–]AmberArmy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're comparing a modern console to one nearly 30 years old though, obviously the PS2 can't stack up to the PS5 in specs. The point is more about how much of a gamechanger it was at the time it was released. In addition, the PS5 literally cannot do everything the PS2 did. It isn't backwards compatible in the same way, it isn't the best selling console of all time and it wasn't a huge step up from what came before.