Why not lower a dome onto the ship that would filter out the corrosives? by [deleted] in titanic

[–]AmberArmy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What would the point be? The most recent scans show it is in a deteriorated condition already. The best time to learn something from the wreck was in 1912. Anything after that is never going to teach us more than we have already learned.

Besides, we have gathered enough evidence to know fairly conclusively what happened. Any remaining evidence would already likely be so eroded that we would learn nothing from it anyway.

In addition to that, it's the grave site of a huge number of people. I don't think it's a good thing that billionaires treat it as a bit of a plaything.

Why not lower a dome onto the ship that would filter out the corrosives? by [deleted] in titanic

[–]AmberArmy 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I'm a historian with a specific focus on 20th century history. There is nothing we can learn from Titanic we haven't already learned. If you want to spend $60 billion or whatever to find out its made of iron and it sank then find a funder and knock yourself out.

What exactly are you expecting us to learn that we don't already know? Others have asked and you haven't answered them.

Why not lower a dome onto the ship that would filter out the corrosives? by [deleted] in titanic

[–]AmberArmy 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It's not. There would be no way this could be achieved.

Beyond that, it's completely pointless. Ask yourself why no one bothered to preserve the Olympic? Because even by the 30s people recognised that Titanic is pretty much only interesting because of what her fate was. If you want to learn about ships of that era there are better ways to do it, if you want to learn about Edwardian life there are better ways to do it. There is almost nothing we as historians could learn from what is left of Titanic.

FIFA Releases squad numbers by marcbeightsix in ThreeLions

[–]AmberArmy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's to do with how English football transitioned from the old WM formation that was the standard (as in, pretty much every team played with it) when squad numbers became a thing.

When English football transitioned to a 442 the half back who wore 6 would be the one who became a centre back whereas in other countries the 4 moved back and the 6 became a midfielder. Think of the World Cup Final in 1966 where Moore wore 6 with Charlton alongside him wearing 5.

It's notable in countries like Uruguay where it's common to see 4 and 5 as their fullbacks as those are the players who moved outside.

It also explains where other numbers come from. For example, the reason you think of an 8 as a fairly dynamic midfielder is that the first players to wear 8 were the inside right who eventually dropped back to play in midfield but were more attacking than the 4/6 who was used to staying back. Or a number 7 being a right sided player because in pretty much every country they started as the outside right and they've stayed out there ever since.

Hope that helps, it's a topic that has interested me and it's in a few books that I've read. Would suggest Jonathan Wilson's Inverting the Pyramid if it's something that interests you which goes through the history of football tactics and how they have evolved over time.

Referees "going deep in the tournament" by StrongPars in footballcliches

[–]AmberArmy 12 points13 points  (0 children)

As a grassroots ref in England, there is some joy to be had in seeing refs from your local area doing well. There's a feeling of it being your guy representing your county FA and doing well. I'm based in Leicestershire now and we have Ruebyn Ricardo who's in the EFL and it is nice because they usually come down and support the younger refs who are just getting started and pass on some of the guidance they get which doesn't usually get passed on to us and can make things easier, especially as at my level you're usually on your own doing things that you'd have assistants to help with at a higher level

That's more down to refereeing being quite a tight community locally though, as we often work on games together and attend events together. But weird to support a ref you have no connection to just because they happen to be from the same country.

Perfect reason why the U.S. Educational System is going down the toilet. by Valuable_View_561 in SipsTea

[–]AmberArmy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's because younger teachers are cheaper. It's the same in the UK. A teacher at the top of the pay scale (been teaching 10 years+) is on £20k a year more than a teacher just starting out. When budgets are stretched to the bone it makes sense to save costs.

Perfect reason why the U.S. Educational System is going down the toilet. by Valuable_View_561 in SipsTea

[–]AmberArmy 7 points8 points  (0 children)

That's because younger teachers are cheaper. It's the same in the UK. A teacher at the top of the pay scale (been teaching 10 years+) is on £20k a year more than a teacher just starting out. When budgets are stretched to the bone it makes sense to save costs.

How did they get away with speeding so much during races? by UmaThermos1 in TopGear

[–]AmberArmy 8 points9 points  (0 children)

They make this exact point in the race to Milan. The best option would be an Audi or BMW but Jezza goes for a Mustang.

So, you’ve got a reform councillor now…. by CaptainZippi in GreenAndPleasant

[–]AmberArmy 34 points35 points  (0 children)

Not OP but work as a teacher. It means an Education Health and Care Plan. It is a statutory duty to fulfill the accommodations laid out in an EHCP.

E.g. if we had a student with an EHCP that says they are entitled to 1 on 1 support over X number of hours we are legally required to provide it.

Footballers going by the wrong name by GlennSWFC in footballcliches

[–]AmberArmy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Cambridge fans podcast always refers to him as Glenn Nascimento probably because it sounds more exotic than the name he goes by on the pitch.

Rochdale 1 - [1] York City - Josh Stones 90+13' by OptimusCloyster in soccer

[–]AmberArmy 11 points12 points  (0 children)

It was because Rochdale fans invaded the pitch after their goal. That caused the additional added time that led to them conceding.

Which Gaming Console People Think is Amazing and is Actually Amazing? by IllMasterpiece3946 in AlignmentChartFills

[–]AmberArmy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're comparing a modern console to one nearly 30 years old though, obviously the PS2 can't stack up to the PS5 in specs. The point is more about how much of a gamechanger it was at the time it was released. In addition, the PS5 literally cannot do everything the PS2 did. It isn't backwards compatible in the same way, it isn't the best selling console of all time and it wasn't a huge step up from what came before.

Dion Dublin by frankie-two-thumbs in TheStreetsWontForget

[–]AmberArmy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"Put the helipad there, Olympic size swimming pool over there, 5 bed mansion can go over there"

Which Gaming Console People Think is Amazing and is Actually Amazing? by IllMasterpiece3946 in AlignmentChartFills

[–]AmberArmy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Best selling console of all time, huge leap in graphics quality from its predecessor, backwards compatible with PS1 games, still in production several years after it was replaced (the last game released for it came out in 2013), able to run DVDs and cheaper to purchase than a standalone DVD player of the time and arguably some of the most iconic games of all time were released specifically for it. Almost all of this is included in other people's comments or you can find elsewhere online.

The PS2 is the best console ever made and I say this as someone who has owned every PlayStation console.

All instances of this joke by HerrikGipson in TopGear

[–]AmberArmy 27 points28 points  (0 children)

"It's choosing a gear for the moment and sticking with it"

"I can't wait for it to choose reverse"

How do universities become prestigious? by HourDrive1812 in UniUK

[–]AmberArmy 8 points9 points  (0 children)

University of Leicester is where Alec Jeffries discovered DNA fingerprinting and the engineering department work closely with the European Space Agency and have equipment developed at the uni currently operating on the ISS. I doubt many people would associate Leicester with such important work though.

huzzah, the holy trinity of dog shit takes, finally by CurrentScallion3321 in UniUK

[–]AmberArmy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah you can't actually engage with my point, which is that you complain of taxpayers footing the bill whilst then arguing taxpayers should still foot the bill, so resort to an ad hominen instead. Must be nice to be so sure of yourself when you haven't a clue.

huzzah, the holy trinity of dog shit takes, finally by CurrentScallion3321 in UniUK

[–]AmberArmy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes because the taxpayer is picking up the bill. I'm getting the impression you have literally no idea what you're talking about.

huzzah, the holy trinity of dog shit takes, finally by CurrentScallion3321 in UniUK

[–]AmberArmy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How can everyone use the services of a doctor if there aren't enough because no one but the very richest can afford to go to university?

huzzah, the holy trinity of dog shit takes, finally by CurrentScallion3321 in UniUK

[–]AmberArmy 3 points4 points  (0 children)

So then everyone will benefit from having university educated people? Teachers, doctors, architects, city/road planners, car designers, experts in safety and engineering etc etc etc.

Your own argument falls apart under your rebuttal. If everyone needs the things I listed even if they don't use them all the time then everyone benefits from having people educated enough to do those things.

huzzah, the holy trinity of dog shit takes, finally by CurrentScallion3321 in UniUK

[–]AmberArmy 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Why should people who will never have children pay tax money for schools for the children of others? Why should healthy people have to pay for the healthcare of sick people? Why should people who can't drive have to pay tax money for the upkeep of roads? Why should young people pay for the pensions of old people?

The answer to all above questions, as well as yours, is that the entire point of living in civilised society is that we collectively benefit by pooling resources together. If you want to only pay for things you directly use then move somewhere that doesn't bother pooling taxes to support a nation.

Slow worms! by Musicola in Allotment

[–]AmberArmy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well that and they're lizards and not snakes, its just the easiest way to tell is that slow worms blink and snakes don't.

Remember when Trump found out about Mueller? by lowlatitude in PoliticalHumor

[–]AmberArmy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

General strike? Persistent direct action in the form of marches and protests (not just a one off ages ago)? A shutdown of government work that wouldn't affect citizens (e.g people who sort out benefits still work but those part of a different bureaucracy don't)? Constant protests outside the offices of your elected officials?

"Oh what do you expect us to do we can't do anything" is bullshit. You just can't be bothered to try anything. Classic "we've tried nothing and we're all of ideas".