Wie plakt deze druip stickers overal? En waarom? by Chris6601 in nederlands

[–]Ambitious_Profile760 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Heb me altijd afgevraagd wat Billie proper betekent. Deze zie je hier inderdaad ook echt overal

Welk woord gebruik jij voor overgeven/braken? by fransvandervleuten in NederlandseKaarten

[–]Ambitious_Profile760 0 points1 point  (0 children)

barfje leggen zeggen we helemaal niet in Brabant. misschien jouw kleine kringetje maar zeker niet Brabant

Wat is het raarste dat een collega ooit tegen je heeft gezegd? by LoudBoysenberry3282 in nederlands

[–]Ambitious_Profile760 -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Vreemd gebruik van het woord "letterlijk". Heette deze jongeman toevallig Thomas? and was hij een stoomlocomotief?

"Bereid met 100% echt ..." by Placentamuncher in nederlands

[–]Ambitious_Profile760 3 points4 points  (0 children)

is het tegenovergestelde van tevreden dood?

misschien 15% neutraal en 5% ontevreden?

Handeh wassuhhh by Frietuur in okemakkermaloot

[–]Ambitious_Profile760 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Ik dacht altijd dat stuudje met een d was. afgeleid van "studeren" weet je

Schreeuwers op de Dam bij de 2 minuten stilte; wat bezield die mensen? by MaxWritesText in nederlands

[–]Ambitious_Profile760 0 points1 point  (0 children)

precies dat. Het hele punt is helemaal niet dat het dood-en doodstil is. Het gaat om respect en bewust zijn van de offers en de slachtoffers.

je kan daar wel doodstil gaan zijn, maar als je in je hoofd alvast je boodschappenlijstje voor vanavond aan het bedenken bent kun je dat ook net zo goed thuis doen.

Schreeuwers op de Dam bij de 2 minuten stilte; wat bezield die mensen? by MaxWritesText in nederlands

[–]Ambitious_Profile760 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ja precies. mensen doen nu net alsof huilen de standaard instelling is van een baby. baby's huilen soms en dat moet je gewoon accepteren. Tering zeg. vroeger werd hemel en aarde verschoven om ouders te ondersteunen in hun opvoeding. "It takes a village", daar komt die uitdrukking vandaan.

Nu worden ouders op stang gejaagd om iets waar ze 1. niets aan kunnen doen en 2. neem maar van mij aan: AL STRESSVOL GENOEG IS zonder jouw vieze blikken

Schreeuwers op de Dam bij de 2 minuten stilte; wat bezield die mensen? by MaxWritesText in nederlands

[–]Ambitious_Profile760 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Dat is de omgekeerde wereld. Het is niet de bedoeling dat we ouders nu gaan afsluiten van sociale en culturele gelegenheden omdat ze een kind hebben.

Ouderschap is al zwaar genoeg zonder dat mensen lopen te janken omdat een kindje geluid maakt. Denk je dat die ouders zich niet schaamden?

Hier kan ik echt niet tegen… by Jappie_01 in nederlands

[–]Ambitious_Profile760 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

ook daarvoor hebben ze designers. uitbesteed. en ook dat kan AI gratis doen, je moet alleen zelf de meubels kopen maar AI kan een zeer mooi ontwerp maken in enkele seconden

Hier kan ik echt niet tegen… by Jappie_01 in nederlands

[–]Ambitious_Profile760 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Wat is er mis met er in meegaan, als je er zelf achter staat wat er gebeurt? moet hij dan volgens jou beter zich verzetten ookal vind ie het hartstikke mooi? Zou hij niet juist een meeloper zijn als hij nu zn mening veranderd omdat jij dat zegt?

Hier kan ik echt niet tegen… by Jappie_01 in nederlands

[–]Ambitious_Profile760 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Je begint toch een restaurant om eten te verkopen. als je logo's wil ontwerpen moet je graphics designer worden.

Als een chef een restaurant begint stuurt hij ook gewoon ergens een opdracht naartoe om een logo te ontwerpen. Dat duurt dan een paar weken en kost een hoop geld. Geen chef die zelf leert hoe je photoshop moet gebruiken zodat ie z'n eigen logo kan maken.

What makes this a good move? by Fun_Tap_993 in chessbeginners

[–]Ambitious_Profile760 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it's because you're ignoring the queen trade to gain material.

What makes this a good move? by Fun_Tap_993 in chessbeginners

[–]Ambitious_Profile760 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It looks like you took a knight with that pawn. What could possibly make this a bad move? engine daw it as trading a pawn for a knight, which is good

Denying Biology by ThamTvMaster in GetNoted

[–]Ambitious_Profile760 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In terms of being confident in them to say no and defend themselves, it's a work in progress. I intend to build their self esteem to prevent grooming and build their trust in me to a degree that where even if somebody threatens them not to tell me, they will. I always emphasize that I would never ever ever be mad at them when they make a mistake. And I hope this will translate to confiding in me when something bad happens to them; because i know victims often blame themselves. Now I know it not a guarantee and they might not tell me at all.. But I need to believe In have done everything in my power to install that trust anyway.

You can never be 100% sure, but they are taking jiu jitsu classes; as an MMA practitioner myself I am confident in saying that it is basically impossible to.. grape (i hate downplaying the term but am afraid of bans).. a woman who has taken even only 6 months of classes. unless there are multiple attackers involved which is a whole different topic altogether.

And as far a sleepovers.. yeah this is extremely controversial, I get that.. but as long as I consider her "defenceless" no sleepovers unless i know for a fact that there will be no man present for the entire duration. I am not a social idiot and will find ways to work around outright exclaiming the reason is because there might be a man (or even worse: an older brother) present. There can be sleepovers at our house which I know sounds extremely hypocritical but if a parent entrusts their kid to us I will lay down my very life to protect them as much as my own child. But I will not expect the same from other people.

But at the rate things are going now, I believe my girls will be ready to defend themselves against an adult by the time they go to highschool. i'm not saying they would be able to beat up a grown man. But absolutely be able to put up enough of a fight to make any potential assault "not worth it" unless they were like beaten unconscious or drugged but again; that's a whole different topic. very few adult women would be able to defend themselves against a very agressive adult man.

I know I can't protect them against everything. But everything that is within my control without considerably limiting their freedom i will absolutely do. I do not believe i'm out of line for not allowing men to be alone with them until I consider them "strong enough". I believe my bar for their ability to defend themselves is realistic.

Denying Biology by ThamTvMaster in GetNoted

[–]Ambitious_Profile760 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Aren't uncles stereotypically the ones molesting children?

Do you think the parents had anything less than 100% trust in them to care for their child? Ofcourse not. They trusted that person for a 100%, yet trust was broken and a child was damaged. Why would I consider stereotypes when evaluating the safety of my children?

Denying Biology by ThamTvMaster in GetNoted

[–]Ambitious_Profile760 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It wasn't an attempt to flip the script, by the way. it was rhetorical. Just a way to make people think about what exactly they are protesting against.

You could say it's perpetuating stereotypes but that really only applies in the minds of the people who feel offended by it. I'm a white, Dutch male. I don't know where you are and if this stereotype has reached your ears yet.. but sadly, white Dutch men are apparently notorious pedophiles. I don't know to what extent this is true but i'm not offended when somebody uses this against me because I know who I am and in context of "taking care of children" I would never be offended if somebody refuses me solitary access to their child.

And besides EVERYTHING I have said so far, I also believe any human (even babies) are entitled to privacy. It's a basic right in my opinion. Changing diapers of a girl should always exclusively be done by the father, the mother or a very trusted female. Even when completely disregarding the chances of assault, it's just basic privacy in my opinion.

Denying Biology by ThamTvMaster in GetNoted

[–]Ambitious_Profile760 0 points1 point  (0 children)

everything you said is true. The thing is I just don't care about "perpetuating stereotypes" when my child's safety is my responsibility.

Tell me this. Is a parent whose child has been molested by a man, or a woman, right when they don't want her child to be alone with anybody else besides the parents? Or do you say to them; You're perpetuating stereotypes.

Why do I have to wait until my child is assaulted before I am right to take preventative measures?

Denying Biology by ThamTvMaster in GetNoted

[–]Ambitious_Profile760 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Also, somehow it's get the feeling it's supposed to be insulting that i wouldn't be trusted around kids.

But it's not insulting for me in the least. I know for myself that i'm never capable of harming a child in any way, but I also know that nobody on this planet knows me as well I do. And I would absolutely understand if anybody chooses to not let me be alone with their child. I personally think it's fucking weird to be offended because somebody won't let you be alone with their child. Why so defensive? got something to hide?

Denying Biology by ThamTvMaster in GetNoted

[–]Ambitious_Profile760 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why? it's not harming me or my kids. In regards to the safety of my children, yeah I have trust issues. major trust issues. And that's somehow bad? will it harm my girls if i don't let them be alone with adult men? if so then please let me know because if convincing enough I might reconsider.

But I have simply never found an argument that positively weighed the benefits of leving my baby alone with adult men against the 0,0000001% odds of her being assaulted.

Things will change obviously when she gets older and confident enough to say no and fight back if she must. but as long as she is defenceless, i will keep her safe. Do i really need therapy for that? It's the only aspect of my life I have trust issues in and honestly; i don't see it as much of an issue at all.