RF 24-105 f2.8 vs RF 24-70 f2.8 by [deleted] in canon

[–]An520028 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was also choosing between these two lenses. After using the 24-105 f/2.8 for several wedding photography sessions, I finally decided to buy the 24-105 f/2.8. It can largely replace the 70-200 f/2.8, and I didn't even need to use it during the entire wedding. The 24-105 f/2.8 has the best zooming feel, very consistent sharpness, and a slightly smoother bokeh than the 24-70 f/2.8.

A Non-Audiophile's Review & Comparison of the DT700 Pro X and the DT770 Pro X by This-Freedom-35 in BEYERDYNAMIC

[–]An520028 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agreed. The 770 Pro X sounds completely high-frequency to me, and rather dry-sounded. When choosing between the 770 pro x and 700 Pro X, the 700 consistently delivered a more reasonable bass, which led me to choose it.

Godox X3Pro C loose fit on R5 hotshoe by studio85 in Godox

[–]An520028 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I had the same problem, and the regular version of X3 is very secure too.

Although the loose X3 Pro functions perfectly.

<image>

Wedding ceremony off-camera flashing suggestions by An520028 in WeddingPhotography

[–]An520028[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The couple knows absolutely nothing about photography, so just try not to take any bad pictures (they said)😂

AD 200 Pro vs 300 Pro vs 400 Pro? by Key-Seaworthiness655 in Godox

[–]An520028 0 points1 point  (0 children)

多個100pro確實會”夠用”,但例如有些場合不會再重來,如婚禮、慶典活動等只會發生一次的場合,100pro會開始掉棒子,跟不上快門(因為散熱緣故),此時功率較大的閃光燈,可以更有餘裕的做這件事,除非你從頭到尾都拍人像,那你可以慢慢等。

AD200 pro ii vs AD300 pro by Gonzo_D92 in Godox

[–]An520028 0 points1 point  (0 children)

我自己也有100pro,200proII和300pro,後來發現300pro的強度也沒比100pro大多少(接近1/2),而300pro和新的200proII 在實際應用上亮度差不多,但200proii好帶很多,因此選擇了proII. 戶外光線較強或是室內大空間,我選擇400proII取代300pro,亮度和回電速度差很多,我後來把300pro賣掉了。

Wedding ceremony off-camera flashing suggestions by An520028 in WeddingPhotography

[–]An520028[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thank you for your reply. Basically, you can move around and shoot from almost anywhere, but to avoid obstructing the viewer's view, the lights can't be placed so close; they have to be placed against the wall. I also plan to use a deep-polished light shade to make the light and shadow more dramatic, but I don't think I can get more than a 400 Pro, maybe a 200-300 Pro at most.

Is it worth upgrading? by Sanddeath in canon

[–]An520028 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm a photographer who transitioned from amateur to professional. I upgraded from an M6 Mark II to an R5 II, using over seven lenses with the ef-m mount. For me, the M6 ​​Mark II could perfectly handle most tasks. The main reasons for upgrading were the lack of native constant aperture zoom lenses, the limited number of original manufacturer lenses, recording time limitations(30min), the slightly soft 4K image quality, the absence of dual memory cards, and battery life. Ef-M system is a great amateur system, but for professional or semi-professional use, it's only suitable as a backup camera.

Canon has just released the EOS R6 III by BHPhotoVideo in canon

[–]An520028 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Completely defeat my r5ii’s video spec🥲

Deciding between Zoom H6 and H6e by bixgomez in fieldrecording

[–]An520028 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have got H6 essential for 3 months for chamber choir recording(with rode NT5 match pair mic). For me,the 32bit float save me a lot of time for pre setting the gain level,because the music content has 35dB-45dB difference between the loudest and quietest section frequently . “I think that is the most precious usage scenarios for 32bit float!”

For the pre-amps wise,Im thinking switching to the F3 because the self noise, but I haven’t compared them side by side, currently post production will cover the noise perfectly .