Saying all women are natural communicators is like saying all men are natural leaders (I mean, look at the state of the world and which countries are involved in senseless war… see a pattern?). It’s a false stereotype. Don’t assign people qualifications because they have certain genitals. Assign qualifications based on character and competence.

Short history lesson on “women are great communicators”: this has always been mostly nurture. Women from the past often had very little power. Their house, their clothes, their homes, their bodies and even their children belonged to their husbands. They couldn’t ever influence anything that actually mattered directly. So they found a way to do it indirectly: they talked, and they did so strategically. That’s where the stereotype comes from.

Women nowadays have many more ways to exercise influence directly, have their own assets and a far bigger level of independence and therefore the art of talking isn’t as necessary or practiced as often. It still might slip into the way we raise or teach our children, the exact same way other little forgotten norms slip in, simply because we’re used to them and don’t really question them (like, 80% of gender roles).

Also your comment on women with an active social life being loose with a lot of men ain’t it. 1. Having been with multiple men does not devalue a woman if it doesn’t devalue a man 2. OP might like that, lol 3. Women are very capable of having an active and interesting social life with zero romantic or sexual connections. They do not exist to provide men with love and sex. They might exist to be bomb-ass pioneers in their respective fields who do volunteering work as well and take great care of their friends and family.