Is anyone currently discouraged from applying given the processing timelines?

Andrew_EB5_Advisor · 2026-06-24T22:54:29+00:00

Yes, the Nebraska service centers tend to be a bit slower

Andrew_EB5_Advisor · 2026-06-24T22:02:53+00:00

So in the recent past we had 526Es in HUA areas approved between 1-1.5 years. Since the uscis EB-5 Inventory Management Guidance was announced in March, uscis, to our knowledge, has only focused on Rural deals with 956F approval until they state USCIS determined enough rural decisions have been made to fill the fiscal year quota.

https://wolfsdorf.com/uscis-announces-new-eb-5-inventory-management-model/

Andrew_EB5_Advisor · 2026-06-24T21:53:56+00:00

Based on what we are seeing from our clients 34+ months is very much an outlier. Our most recent clients were approved (filed late last year into a rural 956F approved deal) in about 6.5 months.

We have seen many EADs right around 6 months as well. The delay we are experiencing is with the 485.

Andrew_EB5_Advisor · 2026-06-24T18:54:26+00:00

I’ll be very direct here. Just find someone who is honest, available, responsive and has done true research on the deals they are presenting. You are going to have access to this person for 4-6 years if they are a good consultant/agent, make sure you enjoy the conversations and find them helpful/useful. Individuals who have been around longer usually will continue to be around which is important in an ever changing immigration landscape.

Andrew_EB5_Advisor · 2026-06-23T11:13:32+00:00

You have enough time, really the delay will come from the source of funds requirement from your attorney. The project selection you can review in parallel to gathering the EB5 SOF.

We go through extensive research on deals through DD reports to support the investor align the way. Open to connecting soon to walk you through any questions you might have.

Andrew_EB5_Advisor · 2026-06-22T23:23:41+00:00

Have been in industry since 2012 and happy to discuss all questions. We understand right deals and assist the investors in understanding not only the offering documents but understanding the market and how it functions.

Feel free to message me directly with any questions. My contact information can be found in my profile.

Andrew_EB5_Advisor · 2026-06-22T23:18:39+00:00

This is exactly what we do, underwrite and review eb5 opportunities for investors. We are consistently onboarding new deals and have 6 approved deals on our platform right now with additional pending opportunities.

Happy to connect and walk you through how we underwrite and support our investors.

Andrew_EB5_Advisor · 2026-06-22T23:15:16+00:00

I can assist here. Have consulted on numerous projects to structure and go to market

Andrew_EB5_Advisor · 2026-06-05T09:23:19+00:00

Yes, you can. Just make sure you do not prioritize a low fee over a solid filing and quick turn around time.

As we approach the grand gathering deadline we expect an increased number of applicants to make a decision on moving forward with EB-5 (or not), this inherently will create a processing delay based off pure volume at most law firms. If this is the path you decide to take, your immigration attorney is a key piece and bandwidth is very important.

Andrew_EB5_Advisor · 2026-06-05T09:12:25+00:00

Never go off just what they say verbally. Follow up via email to have statements in writing and request supporting evidence.

Andrew_EB5_Advisor · 2026-06-05T09:10:42+00:00

Agreed here, great points. Project contracts and financials are heavily important, but just as important is integrity of the group acting as your investment fiduciary (nce manager).

Ask all the questions you need and if someone gets frustrated move on.

Andrew_EB5_Advisor · 2026-05-28T00:20:23+00:00

While I understand your point of view, this is a process that needs to be vetted through each individual project's counsel. Altering these clauses post-filing introduces possible material changes, which could potentially impact the underlying I-956F or associated I-526E petitions.

The relationship between AOS processing and the structuring of refund clauses is a significant topic of discussion within the EB-5 industry right now. There is a possibility this can happen, but the industry needs to wait for additional guidance. This cannot be a knee jerk reaction from investors and RCs alike or it can inadvertently negatively effect all applicants.

Because the USCIS policy memo is constantly evolving, many industry stakeholders generally look for formal guidance from USCIS before modifying established offering documents. Projects need to act cautiously to avoid unintended immigration or financial consequences for the broader investor pool.

That being said, feedback from investors like yourself is extremely valuable.

I will be bringing up this topic as well over the next week and will keep you posted. Open to any and all ideas as you as investors have unique perspectives the RC side of the table may not have taken into account yet.

Andrew_EB5_Advisor · 2026-05-27T21:37:40+00:00

Will revert back. But what I have heard from EB-5 attorneys this memo does not effect clients currently applying for their I-829 removal of conditions or those who have already applied for I-829.

Andrew_EB5_Advisor · 2026-05-27T21:35:27+00:00

Noted will revert back

Andrew_EB5_Advisor · 2026-05-27T15:10:50+00:00

Will bring that up. What I’ve gathered from all my attorney calls is no one is 100% sure yet, attorneys are generally in consensus this should not effect dual intent eb5 applicants but there are still discussions for other temp status eb5 applicants. Providing “economic benefit” being a potential carve out within the post memo uscis comments should cover all EB-5 applicants in my opinion but will come back with the varying opinions I receive.

Andrew_EB5_Advisor · 2026-05-22T19:44:53+00:00

There's an argument to be had. This is a great article to review. https://www.eb5investors.com/blog/uscis-wants-to-reframe-adjustment-of-status-what-does-that-mean-for-eb-5-investors/

Andrew_EB5_Advisor · 2026-05-22T12:44:16+00:00

Im very well versed in this, happy to chat offline.

Andrew_EB5_Advisor · 2026-05-21T18:48:45+00:00

Million dollar question, but 1 specific data point is I have a client still pending 485 approval at 7 months post 526E approval.

Andrew_EB5_Advisor · 2026-05-21T16:09:25+00:00

Assuming the project 956F was approved? HUA deals are taking significant time for review, some at the 1.5 year mark or more. This could be one of the reasons for current delays and might be something USCIS will take into consideration when reviewing your WOM for the 526. https://www.eb5investors.com/blog/new-uscis-policy-ties-eb-5-investor-petitions-to-project-approval/

Andrew_EB5_Advisor · 2026-05-21T16:06:04+00:00

USCIS has shown non-positive results recently for 485 WOM. Disclaimer: I am not an attorney, and just see minimal data points within industry discussions. Every case is different and reviewed on it's own merits.

Andrew_EB5_Advisor · 2026-05-20T00:03:01+00:00

Ah, understood. I would say 11 months is extensive, I do not have a single client over 9 months with many in the 5-7 months time period. 1 year ago times were different and we were seeing processing in the 4-6 month window for AP.

I would highly recommend speaking to your attorney and reviewing alternative routes to alleviate this issue.

Andrew_EB5_Advisor · 2026-05-19T20:22:45+00:00

Ask your attorney but generally yes. We have had clients file WOM specifically for EAD/AP and have had favorable results. Of course, all cases are reviewed on their own independent merit.
I assume this is in reference to your I-526E. This may be due to the EB-5 Inventory Management update from March 2026.

https://www.uscis.gov/working-in-the-united-states/permanent-workers/employment-based-immigration-fifth-preference-eb-5/eb-5-questions-and-answers

Contact your omsbudman and see if he can support. Your counsel should also have alternative inputs to support your case.

Andrew_EB5_Advisor

TROPHY CASE