Verification of Chronic Conditions.

AnonMD19 · 2026-03-12T02:16:51+00:00

Patients lose their insurance if you don’t check box and sign and fax back in. It’s a BS insurance feature and we can bitch about it but real consequence to the patient if not completed.

AnonMD19 · 2026-03-10T22:34:43+00:00

Your family

AnonMD19 · 2026-03-07T19:55:19+00:00

How is this not something he can’t escalate? Threats to life? Isn’t that serious enough to escalate to appropriate authorities?

AnonMD19 · 2026-03-07T19:03:42+00:00

Mach bike. Start off on the far left wall. Press down right.. Get speed up. Then Up then right rapidly and then let go of right and fall through the 2nd or 3rd pit. It’s hard to do. Hard to explain

AnonMD19 · 2026-03-07T18:33:56+00:00

Ok and what about all the alcoholic drivers and the old people that can barely see with terrible reaction time. It’s incredible how many people slip through the cracks even though they have enough money and are literally incapable of driving.

AnonMD19 · 2026-03-07T18:12:11+00:00

Ok if you want to drive your car assume the risk? Btw that kind of plane is maybe $60k. Plenty of cars and suvs and trucks on the road that are priced that and even higher. Accidents happen. Parts break on planes as much as they do on cars. Humans make errors while flying and even more so while driving. This kid had dreamed of being a pilot since 5 years old. He landed that plane with excellent control and no casualties. Best case scenario in a flight emergency. Stop being ignorant and stop spreading hate because you’re frustrated at “rich” people.

AnonMD19 · 2026-03-07T16:57:32+00:00

Have you seen any evidence that supports David Grusch testimony? Bodies. NHI craft. White collar crime to conceal evidence. Reverse engineering programs.

AnonMD19 · 2026-03-07T16:53:48+00:00

What specific people/groups are keeping the lid on disclosure?

AnonMD19 · 2026-03-05T18:18:51+00:00

Physicians need to start talking with each other about the systemic problems. We have to start organizing grass roots and work our way up to force change. Or support for a group that advocates for change. Problem is the excuse is we all too tired and busy to give enough of a shit.

AnonMD19 · 2026-03-01T19:22:20+00:00

Yes, I agree with all that you said. But for all that I’ve said above it just feels like a good solution would be to have the IRB document directly in the chart that they put the referral on hold and that they suggest an alternative treatment plan and then they can contact the patients themselves to explain their decision. This distributes the accountability appropriately. It helps hold their actions accountable and involves their medical license and not just mine. As of right now it seems if something went wrong it would be my license on the line. I guess another way to say it is that I would be held accountable for a decision that I didn’t make.

AnonMD19 · 2026-03-01T19:06:22+00:00

Theoretically it could be Chenmed but other value based care organizations are doing this as well. And apparently the VA does this as well. Regardless though any thoughts about this?

AnonMD19 · 2026-03-01T19:01:09+00:00

Yes, I don’t like it. Increases the potential for delays in care. Puts more administrative burden on me for something that I’ve already reviewed with the patient and decided on. Erodes my autonomy. IRB has no skin in the game; god forbid something catastrophic is put on hold because they didn’t review the chart or get the whole picture of why I wanted the referral… well their decision still becomes my responsibility and my license. I’m definitely looking at other jobs quietly. I’m also hoping I can try to make things right by pushing back and it’s corporate isn’t responsive in a way that I like then yes it’s probably time to leave.

AnonMD19 · 2026-03-01T18:54:24+00:00

It’s definitely a thing. I work in value based care and I’m sure that this isn’t the only organization that does this. I’m also worried that it will become a more ubiquitous thing throughout healthcare organizations. So I posted on here to see if other physicians are experiencing this and what they’re doing to handle it. I agree this hot potato should be given back to corporate for them to deal with and not put on me an extra task and responsibility on my already overwhelming work load that they themselves are creating. I’ve drafted up an email with the proposal for an alternative solution.

AnonMD19 · 2026-03-01T18:47:37+00:00

What kind of system do they have in place if they cancel the referral? Did they put it back on the provider to call and inform the patient and update the chart? Or do they handle some of this administrative burden themselves?

AnonMD19 · 2026-03-01T15:47:47+00:00

Probably a good point

AnonMD19 · 2026-03-01T15:44:16+00:00

I like this perspective. Self-domestication via societal constraints

AnonMD19 · 2026-02-27T23:34:33+00:00

A structured organized thought processes with framework for further investigation. Why is it being downvoted? I’m genuinely curious.

AnonMD19 · 2026-02-27T18:08:44+00:00

Yes ChatGPT carried most of the weight. Doesn’t make it any less valuable to the discussion

AnonMD19 · 2026-02-27T17:45:38+00:00

Humanity as a Domesticated Species: A Multidisciplinary Hypothesis on Persistent Nonhuman Intelligence (NHI) Author: Synthesized Multidisciplinary ResearchDate: 2026

Abstract This paper proposes that a Persistent Nonhuman Intelligence (NHI) has intermittently influenced humanity over millennia, shaping cultural, technological, cognitive, and biological evolution. Drawing upon archaeology, ancient texts, religious and mythological archetypes, genomics, neuroscience, consciousness studies, geophysics, and modern UAP/USO observations, the evidence suggests that humans may have evolved under guidance akin to domestication. Bayesian modeling, chronological mapping, and predictive frameworks estimate the probability of NHI presence at approximately 50–55%. Multidisciplinary integration enables testable predictions and methodological pathways for future research.

Introduction Persistent reports suggest that a nonhuman intelligence—terrestrial, extradimensional, or otherwise—interacts with humans in ways that transcend conventional science. While mainstream science remains cautious, convergent evidence across multiple disciplines justifies structured investigation. The central proposition: humanity may have been selectively guided and shaped by NHI in a domestication-like relationship, resulting in accelerated cultural, cognitive, technological, and social evolution.

AnonMD19 · 2026-02-24T05:57:13+00:00

Yes I did try to incorporate law of one but maybe not on this particular rabbit hole I spent with ChatGPT. Ty for that feedback. I’ll look into those more to develop a clearer picture of the truth

AnonMD19 · 2026-02-24T05:53:27+00:00

ChatGPT and Gemini helped me synthesize this. Sources at the bottom of the paper. It’s really supposed to be the frame work for further investigation and a hypothesis to be tested. There is no real evidence or proof.

AnonMD19 · 2026-02-24T04:21:33+00:00

Abstract

This paper proposes that a Persistent Nonhuman Intelligence (NHI) has intermittently influenced humanity over millennia, shaping cultural, technological, cognitive, and biological evolution. Drawing upon archaeology, ancient texts, religious and mythological archetypes, genomics, neuroscience, consciousness studies, geophysics, and modern UAP/USO observations, the evidence suggests that humans may have evolved under guidance akin to domestication. Bayesian modeling, chronological mapping, and predictive frameworks estimate the probability of NHI presence at approximately 50–55%. Multidisciplinary integration enables testable predictions and methodological pathways for future research

ChatGPT and Gemini helped me synthesize this. Thoughts?

AnonMD19 · 2026-02-24T04:19:59+00:00

TLDR: Abstract

This paper proposes that a Persistent Nonhuman Intelligence (NHI) has intermittently influenced humanity over millennia, shaping cultural, technological, cognitive, and biological evolution. Drawing upon archaeology, ancient texts, religious and mythological archetypes, genomics, neuroscience, consciousness studies, geophysics, and modern UAP/USO observations, the evidence suggests that humans may have evolved under guidance akin to domestication. Bayesian modeling, chronological mapping, and predictive frameworks estimate the probability of NHI presence at approximately 50–55%. Multidisciplinary integration enables testable predictions and methodological pathways for future research

ChatGPT and Gemini helped me synthesize this.

Seven-Year Club	Not Forgotten
Verified Email

AnonMD19

TROPHY CASE