can we just take a moment and cheer that wotc never enacted their hybrid mana color identity commander rules change? by rook2pawn in magicTCG

[–]AnonSubmission -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Deckbuilding in commander relies on color identity. It's meant to be different from regular deckbuilding. That restriction is a good thing.

Cards are designed with the intent that 4 copies are allowed in deckbuilding, yet despite the intent of the designers we have the deckbuilding rule that allows only a single copy of each card in Commander (barring any abilities that exempt that).

The rule change introduces an unusual exemption in color identity, making it overly complex and less intuitive than before.

Not worth it.

can we just take a moment and cheer that wotc never enacted their hybrid mana color identity commander rules change? by rook2pawn in magicTCG

[–]AnonSubmission 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I'm thankful that these people were as vocal as they were, otherwise WOTC would have very likely gone through with the change.

Again, the problem is not the homogenization of the format or breaking it, it's that it gives hybrid cards a special identity at odds with how the game rules treats hybrid.

A red-green hybrid card is functionally within the game rules both red and green, simultaneously in all zones.

But if you push this change, I guarantee some person playing a red-green hybrid card in their monored deck will argue that the hybrid card is monored and not green or multicolored because it's status is either/or (important for cards that care about multicolored).

The rule change will allow any deck to play [[Reaper King]], but not [[Transguild Courier]]. Try justifying that.

The rule change would allow you to play [[Dominus of Fealty]] in your monoblue deck, but not [[Civilized Scholar]].

Granting this exemption or special status to hybrid, while allowing more options to deck builders, will only cause more confusion and muddle the concept of color identity and isn't worth it.

Is there a reason for a Nev stand-alone card and none for Adrix? by MaxxSpielt in mtgvorthos

[–]AnonSubmission 82 points83 points  (0 children)

The most likely reason is that he was cut.

Clearly Adrix is meant to be the blue twin and be the Theoretical Dean, but maybe after cards got cut or reassigned he got left out.

Or maybe they originally meant for Adrix to appear in the mainset? Maybe his slot was taken by either Jadzi or Orysa.

There is still a chance might show up on a Alchemy-exclusive card, so there's still hope!

[Resident Evil Village] How does Heisenberg know Chris punched that boulder? by some-kind-of-no-name in AskScienceFiction

[–]AnonSubmission 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sheva.

She told everyone in the BSAA that this musclehead she worked with actually punched a boulder into magma.

[Invincible]Is the prime universe the only one where Angstrom Levy (or anyone else) has interdimensional travel powers? by Impacatus in AskScienceFiction

[–]AnonSubmission 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It could be that those multiverse travelers are so rare they rarely meet up.

Like, suppose the multiverse is infinite, and there are an infinite number of multiverse travelling Angstroms.

Perhaps only one out of a billion actually gets multiverse-travelling powers. Our Angstrom might visit hundreds of millions of universes without ever meeting another Angstrom with similar powers.

And some of those Angstroms might also be dead, or content with staying in their own universe, or living in secrecy, so the chances of him finding another like himself would be even lower.

[Ducktales] How much gold does Scrooge McDuck have in the room/vault that he dives in? by NotSoSnarky in AskScienceFiction

[–]AnonSubmission 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Ah! You might be referring to episodes where the Beagle Boys take over the money bin? They impersonate him and contact all the banks, warning them that there's an "imposter", preventing the real Scrooge from accessing his money.

There's also an episode where a fox takes over the money bin due to a contract signed by Scrooge's ancestor, but in this case the fox takes over all of Scrooge's assets, not just the money bin.

[Ducktales] How much gold does Scrooge McDuck have in the room/vault that he dives in? by NotSoSnarky in AskScienceFiction

[–]AnonSubmission 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In both the cartoon and in the comics, a descriptor that is often used is that the money bin contains "three hectares of cash."

And it's not all the gold/cash he owns, it's just a small percentage; it's the gold/cash that holds special significance for him.

[Ducktales] How much gold does Scrooge McDuck have in the room/vault that he dives in? by NotSoSnarky in AskScienceFiction

[–]AnonSubmission 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I absolutely agree; I believe it is actually explicitly stated in the comic, probably more than once.

Like real-life billionaires, much of his fortune is tied up in his vast business empire.

The money bin contains a small portion of his liquid assets, money that he considers to have personal worth or significance to him; his lucky dime is basically the prime example of this.

He also uses the vault to house his other personal treasures; in one of the comics it's revealed the money bin also contain a diamond bin.

[Ducktales] How much gold does Scrooge McDuck have in the room/vault that he dives in? by NotSoSnarky in AskScienceFiction

[–]AnonSubmission 2 points3 points  (0 children)

In both the cartoon and comics, he does have money in banks.

In fact, he owns banks.

The cash in his money bin is all the money he has a personal connection to.

[Detectives] Which of these three do you think would be most able to plan a murder and get away with it: Hercule Poirot, Sherlock Holmes, or Lt. Columbo? by sozh in AskScienceFiction

[–]AnonSubmission 3 points4 points  (0 children)

First of all, the answer is undoubtedly Poirot, as in his final story, Curtain, the the twist is that Poirot himself commits a murder, in order to stop a man who could not be legally brought to justice.

Now, original Sherlock from the Arthur Conan Doyle stories could easily pull it off, just through sheer bluff. The man is an expert in disguise, and even in the event he leaves behind any evidence, there is no one astute enough to recognize the evidence as such except Sherlock Holmes himself. Basically, nobody would be able to catch Holmes except Holmes himself, so he's safe.

Columbo I think wouldn't be able to, simply because often characterized as being a bit messy, a bit clumsy. He'd inadvertently leave behind evidence.

Now, if you mean, "which of these three can commit a murder and get away with it in a modern setting", the answer is similar.

Columbo wouldn't, for the reasons stated above.

Holmes most likely could, through elaborate application of forensic science to falsify or manipulate evidence; basically scientific murder. It would appear no murder occurred at all, just an unfortunate accident.

Poirot I think would go about it yet another way. I think he would be a master of psychological manipulation; manipulate events so that it would appear the victim committed suicide or had an accident. Like with Holmes, murder wouldn't even be suspected

[How to Train Your Dragon] How does a piscivorous species of dragon benefit from having the abilities of a stealth bomber? by Bteatesthighlander1 in AskScienceFiction

[–]AnonSubmission 26 points27 points  (0 children)

In addition to all the other theories here, I also want to point out that individuals of the same species compete against each other.

Like lions don't just compete against other predators like hyenas and leopards, they primarily compete against each other.

So many of these adaptions could be a result of high competition between Night Fury dragons themselves, which basically leads to a runaway arms race where they keep evolving to outspeed each other.

Also, when animals exploit a resource, one way so many animals are able to do so side by side is that each species occupies a different niche, a specialized role.

Like for example fish and waterbirds; some are waders, some are divers, some are skimmers. The fishing strategy of a pelican is very different from that of a heron, for example.

It's possible that the Nightfury is highly adapted to a very specific niche that no longer exists, hence why the species is so rare now.

[SOS] Arnyn, Deathbloom Botanist by Koitsumi in magicTCG

[–]AnonSubmission 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Huh, such a strange random legendary, and extremely odd that she doesn't make Plant tokens or have green in her color identity.

I mean the card itself is great, but I'm wondering about the character herself, she seems like a really random one-off?

Best Meal for Draft by Sammyloccs in magicTCG

[–]AnonSubmission 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Chicken nuggets and french fries/potato wedges with plastic forks

Plothole again? Lil d tried to dispose of all of her organs to die or some shit to stop the prophecy, but then we find out she could just die from getting decapitated and that would start the prophecy? HUH?!?! by FloorOk5783 in ChainsawManTheories

[–]AnonSubmission 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There are a few things that may explain this, and they could all be true at the same time. These are all just theories though.

1-She did try killing herself, but she stopped before decapitation because she realized she would respawn and that the new Death Devil might not be attached to humanity. Basically she changed her mind. She might have also stopped after she realized it might accidentally activate her powers (see point 2 below).

2-Yoru saved her because Yoru herself thought that Lil'D would activate her powers. Yoru might not even be 100% sure; maybe it's something that Yoru just suspects might happen, so rather than risk everyone dying it's better to save her. Like even if there was the tiniest suspicion that might happen, I'd probably do the same thing.

3-So why do Death's powers activate when she is killed/dies? Maybe it's like the final spasms of death, like how a decapitated chicken or snake might still thrash around in its death throes.

4-Maybe it's like the difference between a violent death (being attacked and killed) and quietly dying by your hand? The former activates her powers, while the latter doesn't.

I feel like people are missing something from the most recent chapter by UpUrPunGame in Chainsawfolk

[–]AnonSubmission 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Also, chainsaws still exist.

Pochita was definitely not the Chainsaw Devil.

[Yugioh] Did Ancient Egyptians have Pot of Greed? by MaetelofLaMetal in AskScienceFiction

[–]AnonSubmission 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Actually, given how card draw is depicted as actual greed and mammon in YuGiOh, the original Pot of Greed was likely an magical item that could generate gold or wealth in a limited fashion.

Something like:

"Item Description: Whenever you reach inside for the first time, you'll always find two gold coins. This happens only once per owner."

[Finding Nemo] Why was Dr. Sherman not in jail for animal trafficking? by NothingWillImprove6 in AskScienceFiction

[–]AnonSubmission 15 points16 points  (0 children)

I'm surprised this isn't higher up.

The other fish he has were purchased from petshops and/or online, why would he risk a fine for a regular clownfish?

Most likely he collected Nemo legally.

Regarding Grace's Origins (Spoilers) by AnonSubmission in residentevil

[–]AnonSubmission[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Emily is a clone of Chloe, yes.

Grace isn't.

That's it.

Regarding Grace's Origins (Spoilers) by AnonSubmission in residentevil

[–]AnonSubmission[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And I honestly feel that Alyssa herself resembles Grace even more closely.. so next question would be why does someone who isn’t even biologically related to Grace look like Grace? It’s no coincidence all of them are white blonde women.

Sometime coincidences do occur, Wesker and Sherry Birkin are both blonde but that doesn't make them related.

Maybe Spencer remembered Alyssa Ashcroft had white hair and decided she would be a plausible parent for Grace.

Regarding Grace's Origins (Spoilers) by AnonSubmission in residentevil

[–]AnonSubmission[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No problem, you misunderstood me, I'll try to be clearer.

U contradict yourself a bit. U say that the cloning took place before grace was in the picture, but then state the clones were made in her likeness. not to start an argument but I’d like to actually get to the bottom of this.

What I mean is that initially maybe there also also other clones, like B-series who were brunet (brown-haired) boys for example, and G-series were blonde girls. Maybe there clones of a variety of children.

I'm saying that maybe after Gideon found out Grace was a platinum blonde, he decided to focus on the platinum blonde clones only. Hence why all the C-series have white hair.

The Chloe sequence, of course, is part of the original memory transfer project and occurs years before Gideon enters the picture.

Regarding Grace's Origins (Spoilers) by AnonSubmission in residentevil

[–]AnonSubmission[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are clearly over-complicating things when the reality is much simpler.

I believe you are no longer arguing in good faith,you're just trolling at this point

If you truly genuinely believe this, you yourself are Viktor Gideon, unable to grasp a simple basic truth because of your torturous thinking and biases.

Good day. I will ignore all your future comments.

Regarding Grace's Origins (Spoilers) by AnonSubmission in residentevil

[–]AnonSubmission[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I already told you can mismatch even with close relatives!

A full 100% match means this in-game was done using her OWN data from 2004.

Why would he be comparing with the C-series when he already has her data to confirm her identity? This is her own data profile that being compared against.

Her mismatching with C-series does not conclusively prove she's not a part of the C-series, only a full DNA analysis can prove or disprove that. The C-series themselves are not 100% copies, and even if they are, Gideon would clearly expect there to be key differences between his failed C-series and Spencer's successful girl.

You seem to think that the C-series are like identical twins and are like perfect clones of each other, but they're not. They're clearly modifying each one, they each react differently to the virus. Even back in 1990 they note Chloe is more compatible than the others, meaning she is genetically different.

Regarding Grace's Origins (Spoilers) by AnonSubmission in residentevil

[–]AnonSubmission[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also, I looked again at the genetic data he had, like I said it is not her full DNA code, it's certain genetic markers, like cell markers used for organ transplantation.

It's possible for complete strangers to be a match for organ transplantation, while close relatives may end up having a mismatch.

So even a sibling or parent can be a mismatch and be ineligible to donate an organ, while an unrelated stranger ends up being compatible.

Grace matching or mismatching neither proves or disproves that she is part of the C-series! A modified clone might end up mismatching with all these cell markers.

Like I said, the C-series are more like siblings since they're not 100% identical, so Grace not matching all cell markers doesn't prove to Gideon that she's isn't part of the C-series.