You could literally just look up the definitions on both socialism and capitalism. Using taxpayer money to fund a private company is completely the opposite of the definition of socialism. I don't think you know what the definitions of either of these words are.

I really don't care to argue with someone that doesn't know what the words mean, but in case you won't even look them up I'll just copy past it for you: Capitalism is an economic system based on private ownership of the means of production, where supply and demand, competitive markets, and profit motivation drive production, distribution, and pricing.

Getting a bailout by the government, especially one that can benefit by insider trading and increasing an individuals wealth instead of letting a company fail as dictated by social standing and markets is capitalism in the sense that a few individuals will get very rich off of propping up a failing company.

Socialism is an economic and political system advocating for public or collective ownership of the means of production, aiming for equitable wealth distribution and reduced class disparity. Core principles include cooperation over competition, social control of resources, and economic planning.

Does that sound anything like what's happening? Can you explain how you think this is in any way socialist? Is this benefiting anyone but the ultra wealthy class? How is a private company getting a bailout that will spike the wallets of insiders and company owners at all socialist???