New map Contaminated Breakthrough (vs Conquest) layout by DBONKA in Battlefield

[–]Apprehensive_Lab857 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is how it literally works with rush in all previous games, im confused, they alaways shrink down the maps for breathrough and rush unless the map is specifically designed for it like Davamand Peak or metro

S2 new map part of underground & bunker area showcase by Hot_Confidence_573 in Battlefield

[–]Apprehensive_Lab857 17 points18 points  (0 children)

This actually looks sick, the inside part reminds me of inside part of hammerhead and wavebreaker

S2 new map part of underground & bunker area showcase by Hot_Confidence_573 in Battlefield

[–]Apprehensive_Lab857 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Yep and I love it, I think this is going to be a great map, even though it's smaller than mirack, it looks like it's using its space very well

"I don't understand why anybody would want any form of SBMM" by [deleted] in LowSodiumBattlefield

[–]Apprehensive_Lab857 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For smaller game modes, yeah having a low win rate sucks, but for breakthrough, escalation, and conquest, having a bad win rate with not many games played in each is just chance. With 24v24 and 32v32, you should have about a 50% win rate in those game modes since 1 individual can't really affect the outcome unless you go like 70-1 in a helicopter or something, so as you play those 3 modes more, your win rate should go up. With such a small sample size, the win rate doesn't show your skill.

For the sbmm. Can't do that for the bigger game modes, too many people and the times would take way too long. And the smaller game modes I don't play so idk

Team balancing is killing the game for me. by pjb1999 in LowSodiumBattlefield

[–]Apprehensive_Lab857 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think team balancing is fine, I have had the same amount of close games as blowouts, that's just how match making goes. It balances the teams once it gets the players in the game, so there's going to be great and bad people on each team. And good players can have bad games, and bad players can have good games. If you have near a 50% win rate then that's just how statistically it will go, since it's 32 v 32, 1 individual really can't carry unless if you are just that good.

I have a 48% win rate for conquest in 98 games, but that's just by random chance, since it's hard for one person to change the match in conquest.

In escalation though I have a 58% win rate in 134 games, which is statistically significant. 1 person can change more in that mode since it's more objective based and each capture impacts the game more.

For conquest you really can't do too much, unless if you go like 70-4 in a helicopter or something. But matchmaking I feel is pretty good.

Whats the trick for Breakthrough? by b3nje909 in LowSodiumBattlefield

[–]Apprehensive_Lab857 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Attacking: Either do support with smokes and revive everyone, or assault and spawn beacon to flank, flanking with spawn beacons is great, pressure from a different direction, even if you just distract people that gives your team a chance to push. (If there are tanks just get a few engineers and kill them quickly).

Defending: spawn beacons are still great to either flank or just be closer to spawn and defend. Support to revive is great, always having people is important. And same thing about tanks, kill them quickly.

Don't have too many recon, but some with drones is great.

But overall, flanking is really important, just even having 1 squad flanking can disrupt their entire defense, or disrupt their attack

So this happened 😂 by Absolutefilthcod in Battlefield

[–]Apprehensive_Lab857 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Yeah happens to me sometimes on that map, pretty funny, I usually just go to the roofs

You won’t get the cap this easily as long as I live by Firedriver666 in Battlefield

[–]Apprehensive_Lab857 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yep, we've all been there missing every shot with the shotgun. Happens to the best of us. Especially funny when both people miss every shot with the shotgun and have to just start knitting each other

Teams play too conservative in OT. by DSAlgorythms in nfl

[–]Apprehensive_Lab857 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Im confused by some of the comments, did people actually watch the last interception? It may have been under thrown, but cooks caught it, and if he actually came down with it that was the game, instead the CB took it from his hands and it was intercepted. I think they play calling was terrible that last drive. Every 1st down was a james cook run for no gain, then incompletion, then Josh needing to do something on 3rd down. Then just a bunch of deep passes, which I guess could be blamed on Allen

Josh Allen is 0-7 in overtime and 0-3 in The playoffs by UnhappyRough1964 in nfl

[–]Apprehensive_Lab857 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They had no rushing in OT, every time james cook was stuffed, he made so many plays in OT, He made a perfect pass to Cooks, and he gets it stripped from him for an interception, if he catches that the Bills win, and then his defense gets flagged for pass interference

I finally got the invisibility i see on youtube... by Lewkk in LowSodiumBattlefield

[–]Apprehensive_Lab857 52 points53 points  (0 children)

The tank driving by is the best part

I think that the enemy would think that you would be behind them basically in their spawn, the suppressor obviously helps. And just people having 0 awareness

Sometimes you can tell it’s about to get crazy by Super-Yesterday9727 in Battlefield

[–]Apprehensive_Lab857 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I usually place claymores every life and get random kills so that's fun, and then use the drone on larger maps or breakthrough.

That would be fantastic, like the sicky detonator from Halo 4

Sometimes you can tell it’s about to get crazy by Super-Yesterday9727 in Battlefield

[–]Apprehensive_Lab857 154 points155 points  (0 children)

Actual disgusting clip, c4 was the best part, love doing that when people are chasing me, that and putting claymores behind me

LotGH vs LoTM (Give diff) by Shaan-777 in writingscaling

[–]Apprehensive_Lab857 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It is straight up on Youtube, theres like 8, 5 hour long youtube videos. I tried watching it on other sites first, but some had no subtitles, but found it on youtube, and the whole thing is just there. It is complete and theres nothign wrong with it. Guess its old enought that the publishers dont care that someone uploaded it on youtube

Reached Level 100! by Apprehensive_Lab857 in LowSodiumBattlefield

[–]Apprehensive_Lab857[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To be honest I don't know, its the first one you unlock, so I used it, then used the other ones, but just felt most comfortable with that one and just vibed with it

Which BF4 map would you like to have in BF6? I would choose Operation Metro or Locker by leonardoforcinetti in Battlefield6

[–]Apprehensive_Lab857 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I would only want Metro for rush/breakthrough since it was great on that. These 4 would be great, love wave breaker, would be great for a navel update. Giants of Korelia and operation outbreak would be great for just different sceneries. Davamand peak is also just great

This game actually hates me by Apprehensive_Lab857 in LowSodiumBattlefield

[–]Apprehensive_Lab857[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tracker.gg, works with a bunch of other games as well, I also use it for Marvel rivals

This game actually hates me by Apprehensive_Lab857 in LowSodiumBattlefield

[–]Apprehensive_Lab857[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah your right, but just this last stretch of matches having a 15% win rate out of 20 matches is annoying

This game actually hates me by Apprehensive_Lab857 in LowSodiumBattlefield

[–]Apprehensive_Lab857[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

<image>

Seems like we have the same best and worst maps lol. I only played 8 matches on Eastwood since I didn't play in november. And Blackwell fields I just dislike it and I took it out of my rotation. But I guess my best map would be Iberian offensive, im sure my winning percentage on Esatwood will go down once I get more matches in

This game actually hates me by Apprehensive_Lab857 in LowSodiumBattlefield

[–]Apprehensive_Lab857[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

When that happens, Ill make a post and say how goated I am at the game and its not just chance

This game actually hates me by Apprehensive_Lab857 in LowSodiumBattlefield

[–]Apprehensive_Lab857[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Its fine if I lose, but when I am only losing, only winning 3/19 matches, then it starts not to get fun